44net

44net@mailman.ampr.org

3196 discussions

Re: [44net] Bad name in DNS
by Thomas Osterried 05 Jan '20

05 Jan '20

Hello, Am 05.01.2020 um 11:25 schrieb Rob Janssen via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>: [..] > After investigating it appeared that an invalid name has been added to DNS by someone: > > dhcp-44-149-72-.db0eif IN A 44.149.72.89 thank you for your open eyes. It must have been a bug while doing cut+paste. The archive of the source of changes shows the correct entry. I wish a bugfree new year ;) vy 73, - Thomas dl9sau

1 0

Bad name in DNS
by Rob Janssen 05 Jan '20

05 Jan '20

I noted that since a couple of days the updates to DNS have been stuck and it caused a problem with out local DNS server as well. After investigating it appeared that an invalid name has been added to DNS by someone: dhcp-44-149-72-.db0eif IN A 44.149.72.89 Note the trailing minus sign in the name, which is not allowed. Bind with (default) strict name checking will issue an error on this, and (I think that is bad) it will refuse to load or transfer the entire zone. So the previous version of the zone will remain active. This was version 2001012115, while the current version is 2001050245 so it has been stuck for a couple of days (the format used for the version is YYMMDDHHMM). For now I have deleted the bad name, but it would probably be prudent to add: check-names warn; to the zone configurations of the bind daemons running the ampr.org zone so that they have the more reasonable behavior of just ignoring that single name instead of the entire zone. Rob

1 0

BGP Request Process
by VK4AA 30 Dec '19

30 Dec '19

Hi Guys Has the process for BGP approvals been finalised yet? Samantha VK4AA Australian Co-Ordinator AMPRnet

4 3

Re: [44net] 44Net Digest, Vol 8, Issue 185
by kd6oat 22 Dec '19

22 Dec '19

Brett: Thank you for your decades of service to one of the digital sides of amateur radio.. My jnos convers server has been linked to wa7v for many years 24/7 and I am most grateful that you have been able to provide a gateway and for all the work you have done. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours. Ken - KD6OAT > > > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 12:43:00 -0800 > From: Brett Mueller <wa7v(a)wa7v.com> > To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org > Subject: [44net] WA7V Services to End > Message-ID: <7a53f433-ed44-508b-83fd-5bce59361592(a)wa7v.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Hello, 44net ops, > > An assortment of circumstances have gradually led me to the decision to > terminate the WA7V gateway/BBS and related services at College > Place/Walla Walla, Washington, USA. > > Services are scheduled to go offline on Monday, December 30, at > > >

1 0

SMTP Gateway
by Jean Létourneau 21 Dec '19

21 Dec '19

Good day, I am looking for a smtp gateway where I will be able to send mail from my jnos (va2om.ampr.org) to the internet. Any taker? Happy Holiday!. 73 de Jean, VA2OM / VE2PKT -- -- Sysop de: VE2PKT (BBS), VE2PKT-13 (URONode) : VE2RCN-1, VE2RGM-1, VE2RGC-1, VE2RVA-1, (The-Net) : VE2PKT-9 (DXCluster), VE2PKT-10 (Winlink Gateway) RF: 147.435 Mhz (1200 Bps), Internet: Telnet://nodes-ve2pkt.dyndns.org port 23 (Network Node) Telnet://fbb-ve2pkt.dyndns.org port 6300 (FBB BBS) Telnet://ve2pkt.dyndns.org port 9000 (DXCluster) E-Mail: packet: ve2pkt(a)ve2pkt.#qbc.qc.can.noam ampr net: ve2pkt(a)ve2pkt.ampr.org Inet: ve2pkt(a)gmail.com

1 0

WA7V Services to End
by Brett Mueller 21 Dec '19

21 Dec '19

Hello, 44net ops, An assortment of circumstances have gradually led me to the decision to terminate the WA7V gateway/BBS and related services at College Place/Walla Walla, Washington, USA. Services are scheduled to go offline on Monday, December 30, at approximately 00:00 UTC (Sunday afternoon/evening in the Americas). These services include: * Hub_NA saupp convers hub * ALWGW:WA7V-8 NOS Gateway/BBS * ALWBBS:WA7V FBB BBS * ALWHUB:WA7V-4 UROnode * PNW:WA7V-2 (X)Net Router I believe we have a replacement lined out for Hub_NA. I should have a confirmation shortly, and another announcement will be following. It's been an interesting 2+ decades for me, and I'm very grateful to a number of extremely bright and motivated hams around the world who have contributed so much in advancing the all-encompassing art of amateur radio. I've been the undeserving recipient of their creativity, expertise, time and energy. For most it is a labor of love, and certainly not something that has put any bread on their tables. To those amateurs, I heartily say, "thank you!" Thanks for your links, chats, assistance and friendship! We'll see what the future holds. :) Merry Christmas, and happy holidays! 73, Brett Mueller Pendleton, Oregon, USA

1 0

Linux GRE Tunnels
by Jason McCormick 08 Dec '19

08 Dec '19

I'm running into an interesting problem I thought maybe someone in this community would have run into before. We're working on a project to redesign and re-IP our entire radio network. Part of the goal is to stop using OpenVPN and IPSec tunnels (long story) and move exclusively to GRE-based tunnels. The plan is to have two Linux VPS hosts running at a provider with our 44Net allocation and an IPv6 allocation advertised and then routed into the radio network over GRE tunnels to 3 different locations that are all backhauled together. One of the primary goals is to do dual-stack throughout the network. I have one site setup working perfectly - "gre0". It's passing IPv4 and IPv6 traffic over the GRE tunnel. One *key* point to this is that the GRE connection endpoints are iPv6. IPv4 isn't doable for this connection (again, long story but not an option). When setting up the second GRE tunnel "gre2", nothing would work even though the configuration was the same EXCEPT for the fact that the second GRE tunnel was using IPv4 addresses for the GRE tunnel endpoints. Linux keeps spitting out a very odd error when I try to ping across the tunnel I cannot find reasonably documented anywhere: ip6_tunnel: gre2 xmit: Local address not yet configured! The key was the "ip6_tunnel" part that took me awhile to figure out. After experimenting, I've found that if I have one GRE tunnel using IPv6 endpoints (ip -6 tunnel add gre0 mod ip6gre) and one using IPv4 endpoints (ip tunnel add gre2 mode gre), only the gre0 tunnel will work and the gre2 tunnel seems to believe it's missing an IPv6 address. If I delete the gre0 tunnel, the gre2 tunnel immediately beings working with both IPv4 and IPv6 traversing the GRE. I cannot find any documentation that describes this behavior or why it would be the case. I can't switch to IPIP tunnels because I haven't found a way to do a dual-stack tunnel between the endpoints - seems like you can only do one IPIP tunnel between two endpoint IPs regardless of type (ipip, ipip6, ip6ip6, sit) Anyone have any deep wisdom on GRE tunnels? Jason

2 3

AMPR BGP coordination next steps without WB6CYT
by David Ranch 03 Dec '19

03 Dec '19

Hello Everyone, It was very sad news hear to about Brian Kantor passing as he was my AMPR Coordinator mentor and I imagine *the* mentor for many of us. As we need to push on with out him, it's unclear on what is the chain of succession for everything that Brian did. I ask this as I have a new interested member looking for a BGP allocation and this process was always processed through Brian to deal with the vetting process, processing the AMPR Letter of Authority, etc. Can someone from the ARDC, etc. tell me who to contact if I have questions, next steps once I get all the required details, etc? --David KI6ZHD Silicon Valley 44.4.x.x/16 AMPR Coordinator

4 3

Telus and ampr
by Stephen Atkins 02 Dec '19

02 Dec '19

Hello everyone. I've had a two address allocation for a while and I'm just now getting things setup. Just wondering if anyone has some info on (our point me to a wiki page) on getting one of my IP's setup on my home network using TELUS internet (Canada)? I would like to say I'm not new to networking but for some reason I'm not at my best. My plan is to try and setup some rudimentary networking using a simplex frequency between my remote location and my home base. For now I'm going to use 9600 baud UHF just to get things working. I know this will be incredibly slow but I want to try anyway. I may move up to the GHz range later. Biggest thing is I would like to get internet access using the 44 net for field day. This will be in hopes of setting up for emergency situations. Currently I'm just working on this by myself and would like to get a proof of concept going before I demonstrate this to anyone else. Thanks for your help Stephen Atkins VE6CIC

1 0

Re: [44net] 44Net Digest, Vol 8, Issue 178
by kd6oat 27 Nov '19

27 Nov '19

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:26 AM kd6oat <kd6oat(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I was saddened by the news of Brian's passing. > While I did not have the pleasure of ever meeting him in person, I was - > as with so many on this list - periodically in contact with him by email. > My first exchanges were during my days in Los Angeles in the early 1990's > with a 44.16 ip assignment and where he and other provided valuable > mentoring and helped make the learning curve exciting and enjoyable. > Over the years - and until very recently - the one-to-one contact has > remained primarily because of his easy access and willingness to provide > helpful information at a moments notice. > He was an anchor for me in this particular area of the amateur radio hobby > and he will be missed. > Ken Adlam - KD6OAT > Utah ampr.org coordinator > >> >>

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net