I never said frederic was an employee.
I emailed your superiors about this harassment, I will write a separate email about the
other thread you mentioned.
Thanks,
Lynwood
On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 01:17:39 PM EDT, Chris via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Lynwood,
Frederic is not an employee of ARDC.
The 44Net mailing list is not the appropriate place to request information regarding ARDC.
You may email contact(a)ardc.net to do that.
Please, no more emails in this thread or the DNS thread or I will be forced to start
moderating people which I would prefer not to do.
Thank you
Chris - G1FEF
—
ARDC Administrator
Web:
https://www.ardc.net
On 26 Apr 2024, at 18:05, lleachii(a)aol.com wrote:
Chris,
https://www.ardc.net/about/who-we-are/
You're a contractor from the UK, maybe you don't understand US law. I made a
request that cannot be silenced. I ASKED FOR PUBLIC FILE OR HOW TO GET IT of a 501(c)3.
Should I make travel arraignments to go tot he address on record for the 501(c)3?
Sorry Frederic and you chimed in again, but you are grown men - and since you're and
employee, please provide information on a 501(c)3 you keep being evasive on.
Thanks,
KB3VWG
On Friday, April 26, 2024 at 12:59:41 PM EDT, Chris via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Guys, this is all getting a bit out of hand. Please can I ask everyone to stop adding to
this thread and the DNS thread.
If you have something useful/constructive/technical to post by all means start a new
thread on a different topic, but this discussion is now closed.
Thank you
Chris - G1FEF
—
ARDC Administrator
Web:
https://www.ardc.net
On 26 Apr 2024, at 17:36, Rob PE1CHL via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
What still isn't clear to me is (not considering the way the discussion is going here)
what your reason is for "we will not be allowing transfers of zone files to any
server not under our control. You are welcome to make PTR queries like anybody else but
no special zone transfers will be allowed".
That sounds more like a corporate policy than some nice cooperation between radio
amateurs.
And not only is it just "security by obscurity" (i.e. not good), it also serves
no purpose at all to prohibit zone transfers on reverse zones as anyone can re-assemble
them from PTR queries anyway.
Rob
On 2024-04-26 18:05, Fredric Moses via 44net wrote:
We have controlled our reverse space for decades now inside of 44.103.0.0/16 that is
nothing new to us. We have never used *.ampr.org <http://ampr.org> for any DNS
related items for any of our allocations.. Allocations which are still listed in the
portal mind you as we are in the middle of migrating from the different 44.103/16
allocations into our new single 44.15/16, this migration mind you was done at the request
of ARDC. You know how many hosts and devices we have had to change over the past month
now. I know we are not the only BGP speaking allocation holder that was asked to re-ip
and move down the “band” so to speak.
So while 44.15/16 is “new” how we use it is no different then our 44.103/16 allocations.
But it was Brian(SK) who did our reverse delegations to our servers. Last email I have
on some changes from Brian was on July,29th - 2014. So this isn’t “New” process.. Maybe
it’s not something that was done for IPIP only allocations but we have always been BGP
based as was listed in the portal.
And you keep referring to 44.15/16 so yes you are targeting our network.
--
Fredric Moses - W8FSM - WRPA678
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org