- 44net - mailman.ardc.net

by R P

I think I have asked it before but i see on the log a lot of incoming UDP port 5060 to all the hosts (even that are not active currently but defined in the AMPR dns and therefore have routing to my gateway ) from all over the world What is it ? who have interest to look for SIP on my system ? Is there a way to cut and paste part of the log of Mikrotik router ? i can not do it when i enter it from the web interface so could not copy the relevant log part Thanks Forward Ronen - … [View More]

8 years, 1 month

4
3
0 0

misconfigured encap routers?

by Brian Kantor

I've been analyzing some of the encap traffic and finding unexpected things. Several sources of ipencap'd packets being received by amprgw have non-44 inner source addresses. Would you all agree that a protocol-4 (ipencap) packet reaching the UCSD gateway should always have an inner (encap'd) source address on the 44-net? And that those that don't should be considered bogus and be discarded? - Brian

8 years, 1 month

15
34
0 0

Re: [44net] Enabling traffic from inet to 44-net and vice versa

by Rob Janssen

> anybody knows how to filter this traffic with IPTables ? > It would be very helpful. Where is that traffic originated? Is that the address of your own system? If so, it can help to set a preferred source address on your routes towards amprgw. (add src 44.134.x.y to the route command) Rob

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Enabling traffic from inet to 44-net and vice versa

by Marco Di Martino

Hi all, I'm checking my configuration at the gateway ampr-italy-gw.ampr.org due to an issue on routing. This gateway is the main one in the Country and manages several subnets interconnected via VPN (OpenVPN). The ampr-italy-gw.ampr.org is the point of contact with the AmprNet and it's handling the IPIP tunnel. I would like to permit traffic from inet to 44-net and vice versa and, of course, only for specific 44-net hosts that have the corresponding entry in the Ampr.org DNS. Well, it … [View More]doesn't work :) Here is how the ampr-italy-gw.ampr.org router manages the traffic between inet and 44-net: ip rule add from 44.0.0.0/8 table 44 prio 200 GW_ADDR="169.228.66.251" # /sbin/ip route add 128.0.0.0/1 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #128-255 /sbin/ip route add 64.0.0.0/2 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #64-127 /sbin/ip route add 0.0.0.0/3 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #0-31 /sbin/ip route add 48.0.0.0/4 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #48-63 /sbin/ip route add 32.0.0.0/5 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #32-39 /sbin/ip route add 40.0.0.0/6 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #40-43 /sbin/ip route add 46.0.0.0/7 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #46-47 /sbin/ip route add 45.0.0.0/8 via $GW_ADDR dev tunl0 onlink table 44 #45 -- [root@ks28006 ~]# ip rule list 0: from all lookup 255 200: from 44.0.0.0/8 lookup 44 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default The table 44 has a higher priority than the main table where the routes for each gateway are contained (basically what comes from the encap.txt). It should mean that when a 44-net hosts wants to reach an inet host, it happens through the amprnet router at UCSD.edu and not directly via the eth0 interface. Now, if I send ICMP packets from 2.238.198.249 to 44.134.160.1, the following is what I see with tcpdump at the ampr-italy-gw.ampr.org: eth0 (tcpdump -n -i eth0 proto 4) 21:36:36.915644 IP 169.228.66.251 > 91.121.90.186: IP 2.238.198.249 > 44.134.160.1: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 51, length 40 (ipip-proto-4) 21:36:36.937888 IP 91.121.90.186 > 169.228.66.251: IP 44.134.160.1 > 2.238.198.249: ICMP echo reply, id 1, seq 51, length 40 (ipip-proto-4) tunl0 (tcpdump -i tunl0 host 44.134.160.1) 21:36:36.915664 IP 2-238-198-249.ip245.fastwebnet.it > iw2ohx.ampr.org: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 51, length 40 21:36:36.937872 IP iw2ohx.ampr.org > 2-238-198-249.ip245.fastwebnet.it: ICMP echo reply, id 1, seq 51, length 40 My understanding is that it's working correctly, because the icmp reply is sent back to 2.238.198.249 inside the tunnel and towards the amprnet router (169.228.66.251). Unfortunately there's something wrong in the middle because no packets are actually reaching 2.238.198.249 C:\Users\marco>ping iw2ohx.ampr.org Pinging iw2ohx.ampr.org [44.134.160.1] with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 44.134.160.1: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), Any ideas ? Thanks for the help Marco iw2ohx [View Less]

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] misconfigured encap routers?

by Rob Janssen

> For me, most all of the bad stuff is coming in via the spoofed ampr gateway address of 169.228.66.251 When you see internet traffic as bad stuff, you will receive a lot of it from that address, but most of it will not be spoofed. It is traffic from internet to your AMPRnet address(es) that is being relayed, the intended purpose of amprgw. Maybe there should be a separate filter for incoming traffic via the gateway. We have that on our gateway: a local AMPRnet user can indicate if they … [View More]

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] OpenWRT 15.05 upgrade to LEDE 17.01.1

by Rob Janssen

> - HTTP: 44.60.44.10 Now I can access your service for the first time. Rob

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] misconfigured encap routers?

by Rob Janssen

> - make an IP tables rule AFTER (-A [APPEND]) your ALLOW IPENCAP from > AMPRGWS - to DROP IPENCAP > - let us know if you get any firewall hits by checking your running > ipencap list I have done that for a while and I do not see a lot of traffic, but there is some. Part of it is from gateways with dynamic address. When their address changes it takes a while for the update to bubble through DNS, the portal and AMPR-RIP, and during that time the traffic from their new address is … [View More]

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] OpenWRT 15.05 upgrade to LEDE 17.01.1

by Rob Janssen

> Tom and Ruben, > traceroute to 44.165.2.4 (44.165.2.4), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets > 1 kb3vwg-001.ampr.org (44.60.44.1) 1.385 ms 1.392 ms 1.593 ms > 2 mail.sp2l.ampr.org (44.165.2.2) 154.783 ms 171.077 ms 171.653 ms > 3 home.sp2l.ampr.org (44.165.2.4) 171.674 ms 171.668 ms 171.650 ms I cannot ping, connect or traceroute you either. When it works from your side and not from ours, are you sure you have a *working* incoming IPIP protocol forward or DMZ host? … [View More]

8 years, 1 month

4
15
0 0

Re: [44net] encapsulated ipencap packets

by Rob Janssen

> Regarding the other thread about which firewall rules to use, the > gateway is a little more complicated but for my home router I > (normally, not last night in case you saw differently) have the > equivalent to: > iptables -t filter -A FORWARD -i tunl0 ! -d 44.131.14.128/26 -j REJECT > iptables -t filter -A FORWARD -o tunl0 ! -s 44.131.14.128/26 -j REJECT > I think this pretty much covers the requirements for a basic end network? For the outgoing side, yes. It would … [View More]

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

encapsulated ipencap packets

by Brian Kantor

In our tunnels, all traffic from a gateway should be encapsulated and should NOT contain an encapsulated ipencap packet. The ipip router at UCSD logs and discards these; I'm seeing such packets from gateways 77.138.34.39 85.234.252.133 86.161.255.194 185.58.225.84 which suggests that they have a routing misconfiguration. The operators of those gateways should examine their routing and encapsulation rules to see why this is happening. - Brian

8 years, 1 month

2
1
0 0

DNS for Belgium (44.144.0.0/16)

by Ruben ON3RVH

Hey Guys, Does anyone have any contact info for ON4SAX? He should be the maintainer for the Belgium subnets. But I'm not able to mail him through the contact info on qrz.com (on4sax(a)on4sax.be<mailto:on4sax@on4sax.be>) to make DNS changes for my hosts. The domain seems parked and has no MX record as far as I can see. I also saw that the range for Belgium is routed through Wireless Belgium and as such not through ucsd so I am also wondering how I can get incoming traffic from the world (… [View More]

8 years, 1 month

2
3
0 0

Re: [44net] misconfigured encap routers?

by Rob Janssen

> iptables -I FORWARD ! -s 44.0.0.0/8 -i tunl0 -j DROP > iptables -I INPUT ! -s 44.0.0.0/8 -i tunl0 -j DROP > "If the source address of packets entering tunl0 doesn't equal AMPRNet, > DROP them." The problem with that is that it will also drop the legitimate internet traffic that is coming in via the gateway. So, when you want connectivity to/from internet, it has to be more complicated than that. You will need to put a rule in the mangle table for protocol 4 traffic arriving … [View More]

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] misconfigured encap routers?

by Rob Janssen

> What's peculiar about a lot of these non-44 is that they have > the encapsulated (inner) source and destination apparently interchanged: > Apr 19 21:28:27 <local0.debug> amprgw ipipd[66472]: NON44: len 40, > os 91.121.90.186, od 169.228.66.251, is 91.223.133.13, id 44.134.209.15, > ttl 237, proto 6 > Either that or they're encapping in the wrong direction. > I can't offhand think of what would cause THAT. When I see odd addresses on encap links they often are … [View More]

8 years, 1 month

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] Make Error

by lleachii＠aol.com

OK, it's my understanding the source and destination ports are undefined. I'll just leave the mesh DOWN at this time, as the cross compiler is configured exactly as before, and I am able to compile other software. Thanks, -Lynwood KB3VWG

8 years, 1 month

6
19
0 0

UCSD ipip gateway firewall updated

by Brian Kantor

I've made a few small changes to the ipip encap firewall in the UCSD encapsulating router. If something has stopped working today because of that, please let me know. - Brian

8 years, 2 months

3
7
0 0

Internet founder dies

by Brian Kantor

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39621198

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Router advice

by Marc Williams

Hi all, As part of my gateway setup I am looking to get rid of my BT Home hub (which I am having to use with DMZ turned on) and put in an inexpensive but more capable router. So I was looking for peoples thoughts on either Microtik or Ubiquiti Edge routers. Is either particularly better suited? Kind Regards Marc (2W0PNT)

8 years, 2 months

5
5
0 0

Re: [44net] Make Error

by Rob Janssen

> An update - I had success using compiling using 'cpp' instead of 'gcc' cpp is not a compiler. it will only resolve your #include #define etc but the output is still C. > I now receive less error output, but there's still an error: Your crosscompiler setup is seriously broken! It apparently misses critical include file contents, the first error about IPPORT_ROUTESERVER was also caused by that. Maybe you missed some step in setting it up, I remember from the past where I tried this … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Make Error

by lleachii＠aol.com

All, I've been able to successfully compile ampr-ripd for the native OS (Ubuntu Linux x64); but I receive errors when trying to compile for MIPS: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- user@ubuntu-comp:~/ampr-ripd-1.16.2$ make CC=mips-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc LD=mips-openwrt-linux-musl-ld mips-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -Wall -O2 -o ampr-ripd ampr-ripd.c ampr-ripd.c: In function 'create_fwsd': ampr-ripd.c:1536:23: error: 'IPPORT_ROUTESERVER' undeclared (first … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

2
4
0 0

Re: [44net] Make Error

by Rob Janssen

> I've been able to successfully compile ampr-ripd for the native OS (Ubuntu Linux x64); but I receive errors when trying to compile for MIPS: IPPORT_ROUTESERVER should be defined in <netinet/in.h> When it isn't, you can work around that by inserting this line near the top of the ampr-ripd.c file near the other #define lines: #define IPPORT_ROUTESERVER 520 Rob

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

fbi.gov at i0ojj.ampr.org

by Gustavo Ponza

Hi all, Just to inform all of you about the special visit at i0ojj.ampr.org/ir0rm-7.ampr.org by using the following references: fbi.gov. 0 IN TXT Dgoogle-site-verification=L8cauHJF4MANoTCkMbrLkAVfHBta28ctva9n1IDekToQ fbi.gov. 0 IN TXT Dgoogle-site-verification=6UEk-jfg1xPNjz_rQGcRFJOBGxMy1aARDZUTXgSNAqw fbi.gov. 0 IN TXT XublrZj1CzpSEiwtiRFKDAyiek8hRqkqaTTApxvhwai14i8JqVBOauW4cA06i39H5Lhl3HnALCM/xfTxIPEXEpA== fbi.gov. 0 IN TXT 625558384-8740534 -- … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

OpenWRT Upgrade - Linux Bug

by lleachii＠aol.com

All, I did an upgrade of my OpenWRT device to LEDE 17.01.0. At this time, everything is operation as before; except that I cannot execute the ampr-ripd from the CLI or the scripts that worked in the previous versions. I'm suspecting it may be missing dependencies; but while I troubleshoot, I am only accessible from the Global Internet. If anyone else is interested in upgrading and troubleshooting, I would ask that you make a copy of a list of all your installed packages prior to … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

3
3
0 0

Re: [44net] portal down

by Rob Janssen

> Just to keep everyone in the loop: there have been four DDOS attacks on the portal recently, two against just port 443 and late last night (UK time) two simultaneous attacks against 443 and 25. > I have no idea why anyone is targeting the portal, nor who is behind it - as per your standard DDOS the attacks they mainly came from compromised PCs on the end of home DSL lines. We had a DDoS attack that affected our gateway, but it targeted the "Brandmeister" servers for interlinking … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] portal down

by Rob Janssen

> Instead of this debate -- why not spec what the software does and start an > open source project to replicate its functionality. Because this is a one-instance project. It does not bring much to opensource it and have 5 different people working on it in 5 directions, because ultimately we need one instance that governs the AMPRnet. Even when we want to replicate it for redundancy, those copies need to run the same code or at least would have to have exactly the same functionality. … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Mikrotik ROS script update

by Marius Petrescu

Hello, I made some updates to the MT ROS script: - The script now maintains an interface list named 'ampr-interfaces' with all ampr tunnel interfaces. The list is persistent, and will be created on first script run. Afterwards it will be maintained by each interface add or remove. Useful for firewall rules. - Corrected an error when tunnel endpoint host routes where not deleted on interface removal. - Added step by step instructions using winbox GUI (inside the zip file). http://www.… [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] portal down

by Brian Kantor

Appears I was wrong about having to wait until tomorrow; the portal is back up. - Brian

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

UCSD gateway outage

by Brian Kantor

During the night, amprgw fetched a copy of the encap file from the portal which was truncated (it had 259 entries instead of over 600) and one of the entries that was in the copy fetched had no gateway address. Viz: route addprivate 44.131.168.128/29 encap This caused the ipip daemon to segfault and so there was no routing between Internet and tunnel subnets for an hour. The rip sender was similarly affected. Later fetches of the encap file obtained ones that appear to be intact and all … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

8
9
0 0

Linux/Android kernel security bug

by Brian Kantor

The Register reports a Linux/Android kernel flaw that could expose you to remote privileged execution of arbitrary code: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/14/new_critical_linux_kernel_flaw/ As a lot of the machines and routers on the Amprnet are based on Linux, this may be incentive for you to update to the latest kernel. - Brian

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] UCSD gateway outage

by Rob Janssen

> During the night, amprgw fetched a copy of the encap file from the portal > which was truncated (it had 259 entries instead of over 600) and one of > the entries that was in the copy fetched had no gateway address. Viz: > route addprivate 44.131.168.128/29 encap > This caused the ipip daemon to segfault and so there was no routing > between Internet and tunnel subnets for an hour. For this particular issue it would help when the encap file had a trailer that the script … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

DNS

by Marc Williams

So that time has come to get some DNS entries added.G1FEF seems to be my coordinator. Should I approach him about entries I cannot spot a contact address anywhere. Regards Marc (2W0PNT)

8 years, 2 months

3
3
0 0

Portal down

by Marc Williams

The ampr portal is down for me here in the UK. Anyone else seeing an issue? Regards Marc (2W0PNT)

8 years, 2 months

4
6
0 0

Small corrections and a bug fix: ampr-ripd 1.6.2 and amprd 1.6

by Marius Petrescu

Hello, I made some small fixes without major functional impact to ampr-ripd: - Routes where not cleaned up in debug mode, after hitting CTRL-C - If RIP forwarding was used and the forward interface became inactive/disappeared, the daemon would not be able to send any RIP updates. This use case can occur e.g. if ampr-ripd is providing RIP broadcasts for a jnos via a tunnel. On jnos crash the tunnel would fail and would not receive route updates after restart (tnx. Gus, I0OJJ for report … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> I've sorted the source address and am now originating with a source > address of 44.131.14.255. Now I can ping those two other mentioned addresses > I guess this also highlights another issue, does anyone have a pointer > to the correct way to set up filters for this? I have added some quick > rules to prevent my gateway being a public IP relay, but it looks like > many others have not. I am not sure the correct way to configure these > filters for the general use case. … [View More]I should now be discarding all > packets that don't have a source or destination within my network, but > I do not check for spoofing beyond that. This should be "good enough"? > Clearly, others have gone further. Well, what I have done up to now is a filter to allow IPIP traffic only from registered IPIP tunnel hosts, but no further. There is no strict "reverse path" checking yet, so anyone with a registered tunnel could in fact spoof traffic for any source IP. Maybe I'll fix that later, but for now I decide to allow traffic that may be routed somewhere else and then forwarded in a tunnel. The main purpose of the filter is to keep out the opportunists on Internet that could try to get around a firewall using tricky tunneled packets, not to regulate what the AMPRnet users can do. (I have seen examples of unwanted IPIP traffic, and lately GRE is a popular target as well, so similar filters are in place to allow GRE only from locally registered GRE endpoints) The filter is done as a -x script called by ampr-ripd when it updates the route table. The script is like this: #!/bin/sh # script called when ampr-ripd updates route table # load encap.txt into ipipfilter list AMPRGW="169.228.66.251" gwfile="/dev/shm/gw" cd /var/lib/ampr-ripd || exit 1 grep addprivate encap.txt | sed -e 's/.*encap //' | sort -u >$gwfile if iptables -N ipipfilter 2>/dev/null then iptables -F ipipfilter iptables -A ipipfilter -s $AMPRGW -j ACCEPT while read ip do iptables -A ipipfilter -s $ip -j ACCEPT done <$gwfile iptables -A ipipfilter -j LOGREJECT else iptables -L ipipfilter -n | grep ACCEPT | fgrep -v $AMPRGW | \ sed -e 's/.*-- //' -e 's/ .*//' | sort | diff - $gwfile | \ while read d ip do case "$d" in ">") iptables -I ipipfilter -s $ip -j ACCEPT ;; "<") iptables -D ipipfilter -s $ip -j ACCEPT ;; *) ;; esac done fi rm -f $gwfile This updates the "ipipfilter" chain that is used in the input firewall like this: iptables -A firewall -p 4 -j ipipfilter I use this method to have some statistics of traffic per endpoint as well, when you don't need that it would be better to use ipset to maintain an address set to be matched by a single iptables line. Rob [View Less]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> If you want to test it, 44.131.14.254 is a second loopback on the > gateway that is used for status monitoring. 44.131.14.192 is a unicast > node "inside" my network to check end to end connectivity. Your network is OK in our routing table. I can ping 44.131.14.255 but not those other addresses. Rob

8 years, 2 months

4
4
0 0

New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Marius Petrescu

Hello! Today I released an update to ampr-ripd (1.16) and amprd (1.5) to support ipip encapsulation on subnets which have their endpoints BGP announced in the 44net space. Just compile and replace your current daemon executable file (stop the old one first). No changes in configuration should be necessary. Get them as usual from my ham project page: Internet: http://www.yo2loj.ro/hamprojects/ampr-ripd-1.16.tgz http://www.yo2loj.ro/hamprojects/amprd-1.5.tgz 44net: http://yo2tm.ampr.… [View More]

8 years, 2 months

4
9
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> Can you ping .254? .255 should go direct and .254 should be > encapsulated to the same machine. No > Do you have an address I can test to? I have been doing a few tests > and it would appear that there are some issues here. 44.137.0.1 should be fine, and 44.137.41.97 as well > Previously I was able to access services that were public the same as > an external host, but now many of those are not working. As an example > 44.137.0.1 works fine from an external IP address,… [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] Gatway up

by Rob Janssen

> We do this for a large percentage of our customers without issue. We route public subnets to customer specific firewalls which then translate those addresses to internal hosts: You are doing NAT. I know this is customary in commercial internet practice but in HAMNET/AMPRnet we don't like NAT. (too much time is wasted by debugging the issues caused by inserting NAT into networks that also have direct routing) Rob

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> Now another question about directly connected 44net addresses - is there > a way for them to reach tunneled addresses? I would prefer to have my > services accessible from all 44net addresses when I start offering > something serious later this year. ATM, it appears my /24 would be > unreachable from these addresses, because even if there is a host route > to an endpoint, the 44net address is not exposed to directly connected > endpoints (they see the public IP of my … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> Now, ampr-ripd does identify this host as directly connected, which > appears to be the expected behaviour with the new version. All well and > good from the Pi, but there is one significant implication - the source > IP is no longer my 44 net IP, but it's the public IP of my router, and > the internal IP is the 10.x IP of the Pi (my regular IP range. I think > that's where things are breaking. Ah yes, it would be better when ampr-ripd added a "src" option with the IP of … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [44net] Gatway up

by Rob Janssen

> Good morning all, > I seem to have my gatway up (44.131.192.128) > It responds to some of the ampr ping tools in the service list but not others. Could I ask a few of you to ping it and see if you can see it. It works! Note it is a bit controversial to use the first (and last) address of your subnet. You may run into problems sometime. You have a /29 so you should use 6 addresses. Also, please register DNS names for your addresses. Rob

8 years, 2 months

3
2
0 0

Returning an assignment

by James Sharp

I have a small subnet I was assigned by the Florida administration. I have since moved to Nevada. Should I return the assigned block and get a new one from the Nevada coordinator, just to keep things square and straight?

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Brian Kantor

Mike, the problem is that the n8lrf gateway has an address on the subnet instead of a commercial IP address and is therefore not reachable. - Brian On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Michael Wolthuis wrote: > Rob, > I have managed that subnet since early 90's. What is your concern? You are welcome to be assigned ips on it in Kent County. I have several other subnets for our HamWan project and even an IPv6 assignment from ARIN. > > How can I help meet your goals? > … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

I have installed the 1.16 on our gateway (without the safeguard for now) and it appears to be doing its thing. I can ping hosts on those test networks. But there also is a network 44.102.128.0/24 and it does not work. Is that one okay or is it another config mistake? I suppose so, as its gateway 44.102.128.1 is routed to amprgw. I'm afraid we need better directions and/or safeguards in the portal. Rob

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> Wouldn't you achieve the same result by adding that network's IP/subnet > to the -a list? Yes, but then I would have to know the offender's IP beforehand :-) However, it would be possible to just delete the route in the -x script that we already have. I think ampr-ripd will not detect that and the route will not be added every 5 minutes, right? Rob

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> If the daemon encounters a 44 gateway in the RIP data, it creates a host > route to that specific host via the default gateway of the system. I was thinking about one specific issue: when we run this code on our gateway, which is BGP-routed for our 44.137.0.0/16 network and is on the IPIP network as well and runs ampr-ripd, and some portal user who does not understand the system well, they could add a gateway with an endpoint address inside the 44.137.0.0/16 network and we would add a … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

Gatway up

by Marc Williams

Good morning all, I seem to have my gatway up (44.131.192.128) It responds to some of the ampr ping tools in the service list but not others. Could I ask a few of you to ping it and see if you can see it. Many thanks Marc ("2W0PNT)

8 years, 2 months

4
5
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> No, but it is quite simple. > If the daemon encounters a 44 gateway in the RIP data, it creates a host > route to that specific host via the default gateway of the system. Aha ok that is a nice solution. It should fix the problem for those that have two routing tables. In our gateway we are using a single routing table (with some different metrics) so we don't have the problem for isolated gateways, but your solution would still fix the case where the endpoint has an address … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released

by Rob Janssen

> Today I released an update to ampr-ripd (1.16) and amprd (1.5) to > support ipip encapsulation on subnets which have their endpoints BGP > announced in the 44net space. Is it described somewhere how that works? Rob

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

pfsense

by Tom C

Is anyone using pfsense as your gateway/router? If so how do you handle rip44? Is anyone interested in testing a package if I compile ampr-ripd? Tom/N2XU/BSCS/CASP, Security+ ce -- 73 de N2XU/Tom Cardinal/MSgt USAF (Ret)/BSCS/Security+/IPv6 Certified

8 years, 2 months

2
1
0 0

Introduction

by Marc Williams

Hi folks on the list, The obligatory introduction email. I am Marc (2w0pnt) based in the Vale of Glamorgan in Wales.Currently messing around with ax25 on 2m and wifi meshing using Ubiquiti equipment. All this is currently around serving an Synchonet bbs system.I have been collecting packet tnc gear for a few years now buying it cheap whenever it appears on gumtree/ebay/etc and now finally have moved to a location with the space for me to properly play with it all. Cheers Marc

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

rackmount server(?)

by Brian Kantor

The perfect accessory for your server rack: http://www.canford.co.uk/Products/11-231_CANFORD-RACKWINE-Winerack-rack-mou… - Brian

8 years, 2 months

3
2
0 0

Re: [44net] rackmount server(?)

by Rob Janssen

> The perfect accessory for your server rack: > http://www.canford.co.uk/Products/11-231_CANFORD-RACKWINE-Winerack-rack-mou… <http://www.canford.co.uk/Products/11-231_CANFORD-RACKWINE-Winerack-rack-mou…> > - Brian A bit expensive for the amateur... Seriously, we a looking for a rackmount coffee machine for our repeater site. We are often working there all saturday and we need to leave the place tidy. Lugging a coffee machine there and taking it home again becomes a bit … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

node linux

by Eduardo Castillo

Hello ! I'm trying a node on linux I leave the data to see if you can connect Your nodes to mine route lu9dce-2 lu9dce.ampr.org udp 93 b Can also be used udp 10093 and tcp ============= 73

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

OpenVZ Ham Radio image

by Shawn Bush

I currently use Proxmox, a virtualizing operating system. It uses OpenVZ and I was wondering if there is a image for ham radio users. If not I was thinking of using my web server and maybe hosting a image that I could maintain. I currently have net44 [some what] running in a VM alone with linBPQ32. It has a web based login to the shell and webmin for maintaining the VM. I would probably like to setup something like that for the VM. I'm by far an expert with net44, but would be interested in … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

3
2
0 0

Re: [44net] Trouble creating a Gateway into 44net

by Rob Janssen

> I am sorry about my multitude of questions but sometimes I can read > things a million times and still not understand. > Would I have to use either ampr-ripd > <http://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Ampr-ripd>, or rip44d > <http://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Rip44d> on the server to forward the traffic > to my AMPRnet box? Would I have to use either ampr-ripd > <http://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Ampr-ripd>, or rip44d > <http://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Rip44d> to tell the server … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

5
5
0 0

Re: [44net] Trouble creating a Gateway into 44net

by Rob Janssen

> Subject: > Re: [44net] Trouble creating a Gateway into 44net > From: > "Augustine Tabeling, W8AWT" <w8awt(a)qsl.net> > Date: > 03/24/2017 12:36 PM > > To: > 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu > > > > "An alternative when you do not want to do as much on your brother's computer >> and do have a Linux system yourself, is to just forward all IPIP traffic received >> by your brother's computer to your computer over the local network, and run >… [View More]

8 years, 2 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] Trouble creating a Gateway into 44net

by Augustine Tabeling, W8AWT

Hi All, > > I am new to 44net and I am trying to create a gateway into it. but I > am running into problems. > My brother runs a Ubuntu server on our LAN and has the router DMZ'd to > it. I would like to create a gateway to 44net on the LAN but not on > his server. Would it be possible to set up 44net access on the LAN and > working with but not on his server. if possible I would like to start > by using a Ubuntu Server Virtual Machine and later move to a Linksys … [View More]

8 years, 2 months

3
7
0 0

Re: [44net] FW: JNOS2.0K and Netrom problem

by Rob Janssen

> While ago, just for fun, SUCCESSFULLY compiled JNOS-2.0k > on Debian-8.7/64 bit with CFLAGS -m64 > This binary is running right now on desktop PC instance of JNOS: > 2LPJNS:SP2L - simply flawlessly... Hi! Ok, that is good! I once tried this with NETCHL and it failed, and I did not want to spend the effort of going through all code to make it 64-bit secure, and this is a waste for such a program anyway (it does not require large integers or pointers that can access more than … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

5
6
0 0

Re: [44net] FW: JNOS2.0K and Netrom problem

by Rob Janssen

> A couple of weeks ago I downloaded and compiled jnos2.0K and found that > while the compile appeared to be successful, jnos would crash when a nodes > list was sent or I entered "netrom bc xxx" > So I have learn a lot about linux since then but not yet found the problem. > I compiled using Fedora 24 with the most latest updates on two different > PC's and today downloaded the gz file again. As you mention JNOS I presume you are not using the NET/ROM code built into the … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

2
2
0 0

FW: JNOS2.0K and Netrom problem

by vk1kw

Hi All, A couple of weeks ago I downloaded and compiled jnos2.0K and found that while the compile appeared to be successful, jnos would crash when a nodes list was sent or I entered "netrom bc xxx" So I have learn a lot about linux since then but not yet found the problem. I compiled using Fedora 24 with the most latest updates on two different PC's and today downloaded the gz file again. A kind user has helped enormously and sent me a file he compiled last December 11 (I think) and it runs … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] TimeFrame

by Rob Janssen

> What's the timeframe to get a block of IP's, I'd like to start testing > and messing around with AMPRnet. I've got BGP routing available, and I > can't wait to get connected. > I am my Wireless ISP, so that won't be an issue. I have a few different > routes, so I'm hoping for a /23, and put one on each end of my network. Well, it should be mentioned that going directly for BGP routing and mentioning that you are an ISP is probably not going to speed things up! It would be … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

3
2
0 0

TimeFrame

by Michael W Rhone II

What's the timeframe to get a block of IP's, I'd like to start testing and messing around with AMPRnet. I've got BGP routing available, and I can't wait to get connected. KB3PEV Michael W Rhone II

8 years, 3 months

4
5
0 0

Re: [44net] TimeFrame

by Michael Fox - N6MEF

> We do service a handful repeaters, and I'm hoping to do a some sort of > RF based TCP/IP solution, haven't found one I like yet. Any > recommendations? I could go Wifi based, 900/2.4,5ghz, but I'm hoping > to find something other then packet to use at 440 or 1.2. Check out NW Digital Radio's UDRX-440 (56kbps IPv6 on 440 MHz) MichaelN6MEF

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Axip and mail

by Shawn Bush

Hello, I have linbpq32 setup and would like to get more axip connections and chat links. I also would like to get some messages flowing my direction. Could anyone help? I can give you my MAP line... 73's Shawn Bush KD8NCV

8 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

JNOS2.0K and Netrom problem

by vk1kw

Hi All, Since compiling JNOS2.0 some years ago, I have always had problems with Netrom transmits killing it back to the directory prompt. I have been using JNOS1 version ? in its place for a long time because of the same problem. But today I downloaded and compiled the latest JNOS2.0k and have the very same problem. It all compiles ok on my Fedora (latest updates) it starts and runs perfectly until it does a node transmit and dies immediately. I can poke it with all the netrom commands until … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

3
5
0 0

[xfbb-bis] - (new/test) mailing list

by SP2L

Last night launched fully functional mailing list named xfbb-bis and currently widely available at: http://www.sp2l.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/xfbb-bis I warmly invite everyone wishing/willing to test performance and usability of this site. Best regards. -- Tom - SP2L ------------------------------------ It is nice to be important. But it is more important to be nice!

8 years, 3 months

3
3
0 0

bogus entry in encap file

by Brian Kantor

The encap file currently contains a bogus entry: route addprivate 44.8.1.16/28 encap 0.0.0.0 I've asked Chris to make it impossible to enter this into the portal as it's clearly wrong. The ripsender and amprgw encapsulating daemon discard this already. - Brian

8 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [44net] Hello

by Tom C

W4EWH de N2XU. The 172.x.x.x space I use sits within the reserved RFC-1918 172.16.0.0/12 space reserved for private networks. I use it for my home LAN just as I could use 10/8 or anywhere in 192.168/16 space. I use it because some folks are unaware of the allocation and are more likely to see it as you have which is intended to make them shy away from messing with it OR ask questions which I welcome because it's an opportunity to help folks learn something they might not know. Any time we … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] AXUDP spec

by Rob Janssen

> >/The list of UDP ports at Wikipedia(1) doesn't show port 93 or 10093, /> >/so I suggest we correct Wikipedia's list, since port 93 is shown as /> >/assigned to "Device Control Protocol" by the IANA(3). / > Yes, our usage of port 93/UDP for AXUDP is completely unrecognized by > IANA. There is no official document describing AXUDP so there is no > way for us to claim a port - although there's no prohibition on > using any port number we want, since port numbers … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [44net] Hello

by Rob Janssen

> I'm a bit confused by your post: since 172.29.x.x addresses are > reserved for "Detached" networks, please clarify the source of the > 172.29.60.0 IP range you mentioned. Is it provided by your ISP, or are > you going through a corporate network to get to the Internet? TIA. This range is from RFC1918 where the 192.168 addresses also come from. He probably has those addresses on his LAN and uses NAT to connect to internet. Of course it is possible to use NAT between such a range … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

AXUDP spec

by Michael Fox - N6MEF

I'm looking for the specific definition of AXUDP. Is there an official protocol specification for AXUDP somewhere? Thanks, Michael N6MEF

8 years, 3 months

6
12
0 0

Hello

by Tom C

I've bitten the bullet and started to make some progress getting on 44net. I'm certain my current issues are firewall and I'll get it sorted out. My non-ham network is in the 172.29.60.0/22 range. I don't think I'm leaking internal stuff to my partially built tunnel but If anyone sees packets from that block please let me know. Status: Attempted to ping 44.0.0.1 on a system on the ampr enclave on my network, With tcpdump listening on the gateway ampr0 interface I can see packets going out on … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

4
4
0 0

Re: [44net] AXUDP spec

by Rob Janssen

> Unfortunately, there are problems with AXIP and AXUDP ever since the > revisions of AX.25 were published - the AX.25 frames may get too big > to encapsulate in unfragmented IP and UDP frames. Any new document > would have to discuss the fragmentation issues, and I'll bet they're > not defined. (As far as I know, the same issue applies to ROSE, KISS, > and Net/Rom encapsulation too.) Is this an issue? The AXUDP protocol simply is "put AX.25 frames in UDP datagrams" and an … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

amsat.org mail

by Rob Janssen

Earlier I wrote: > Well I did not get a mail from you, probably it has been lost somewhere due to spamfiltering. I now found how that happened... I use my @amsat.org address on this list, and I found that the forward address has been reset about 2 weeks ago, back to a value that it was a few months ago. I had changed it since. I still receive most of my mail because that other path still sort of works, but it tends to block a lot of mail that from the amsat.org forwarder as spam. So I … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] Is AMPR still relatively active?

by Elias Basse

I have received repeated requests from a non licensed user. When I reject, he resubmits. It is obvious that this person may have an alterior motive as it is a hosting company. What to do in such cases? I have just let the request sit. None of the hams or it people in my area have ever heard of the hoster. Any way to ban a submission? Best, Elias Kd5jfe On Feb 20, 2017 3:00 AM, "Rob Janssen" <pe1chl(a)amsat.org> wrote: (Please trim inclusions from previous messages) … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

4
3
0 0

Re: [44net] Is AMPR still relatively active?

by Rob Janssen

> I was thinking what would be helpful is if there was specific information required, it would be good to prompt for it ahead of time. In reading through these threads, it appears there can be some variance in what may be required by each coordinator. Perhaps instead of free form text block there could be a means to prompt for some of the information that would be considered qualifying fields. That is a good point! There should be an optional text record for each network, to be entered … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] Is AMPR still relatively active?

by Rob Janssen

> Thanks Tom. The portal already automatically sends reminder notices > to coordinators with outstanding allocation requests, twice a month. > If all the coordinators agree, we could change that to weekly. I don't think that will help. In the cases where I did not get a response from others it usually turned out they were moving, busy at work, etc. Overwhelming them with more notices is not going to solve that. > I find that the coordinations which take more than a few minutes to … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] How to reach VE2HOM?

by Rob Janssen

> Hello Rob, > I have receive your email this morning and reply to it before your send > on the group, I also close my amprnet for the moment. I'm new with the > mikrotik router and don't know all, I get information on the internet to > get it work. Sorry for the bad packet this is not intentionnal. > 73 de Pascal > ve2hom Hi Pascal, Well I did not get a mail from you, probably it has been lost somewhere due to spamfiltering. Good to hear you use a MikroTik router! … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Is AMPR still relatively active?

by F6CNB

Jim, For the european activity, you should read the Jann DG8NGN paper presented at the DCC 2014 in Austin, TX. http://tapr.org/pdf/DCC2014-TheEuropeanHAMNET-DG8NGN.pdf 73 Remi F6CNB/AG5IR

8 years, 3 months

8
13
0 0

Re: [44net] Is AMPR still relatively active?

by William Lewis

> This also provides an opportunity for peer review in cases of misguided > allocation schemes >(such as breaking up a state block by county). > >Tom Tom. Can you validate why using a county scheme is misguided? ---------- Wm Lewis (KG6BAJ) AMPR Net IP Address Coordinator - Northern and Central California Regions (A 100% Volunteer Group) ______________________________________________ ---------- This message is for the designated recipient only and MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

3
2
0 0

How to reach VE2HOM?

by Rob Janssen

Does anyone know how to reach VE2HOM? He is keeping his contact information well-hidden, it appears. His gateway at 206.80.251.222 is sending a lot of traffic with RFC1918 source address: Feb 19 15:00:53 Packet DROP: IN=tunl0 OUT=eth1 TUNL=206.80.251.222 SRC=192.168.0.5 DST=44.137.42.18 LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=62 ID=13455 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=40510 DPT=443 WINDOW=29200 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 Feb 19 15:00:57 Packet DROP: IN=tunl0 OUT=eth1 TUNL=206.80.251.222 SRC=192.168.0.5 DST=44.137.42.18 … [View More]

8 years, 3 months

4
3
0 0

Configuration for Ubiquity UniFi Gateway

by F. John Rowan

Has any one successfully configured the Ubiquity UniFi Gateway to work with Amprnet ? If so would you be willing to share your configuration. Thanks

8 years, 3 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] Is AMPR still relatively active?

by Rob Janssen

> I am trying to get a feel for how active AMPR is today. This varies a lot by region. The old network (1200/9600 bps packet radio) is completely dead in most regions and what is left over in those speeds is usually only APRS, so unrelated to IP used in AMPRnet. However, in some places new networks are being built using WiFi technology. Much faster and much more usable. Plus there is tunneling and direct routing of the net-44 space over internet to interconnect those islands. Rob

8 years, 3 months

2
1
0 0

Is AMPR still relatively active?

by Jim Hankins

Greetings, I am trying to get a feel for how active AMPR is today. I am a software developer by trade these days and am relatively new to the hobby but not to IT / networking. Looking for a place to get involved and give back to the community. Regards, Jim KD8MTY Sent from my iPhone

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Re: [44net] Amprnet vpn

by Rob Janssen

> Subject: > [44net] Amprnet vpn > From: > Shawn Bush <daemon75joker(a)gmail.com> > Date: > 02/17/2017 01:18 PM > > To: > 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu > > > something > that I couldn't figure out how to get a ubuntu vm to run with. > > In the ubuntu host, the ipip works just fine and there is a module for it. > But the module isn't in the VM and I dont see why. You probably are not running a full VM (hardware virtualization with a standard OS … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Amprnet vpn

by lleachii＠aol.com

Shawn, I'm lost; but I guess my inquires sum up to: - Are you running a stock installation of Ubuntu, or is it a version offered by the Virtual Machine Provider? - How are you "receiving the route information" and what do you mean by "but that would be it"? Did you receive route information via rip44d and confirm it by typing: ip route show table 44 ? Have you been successful at getting rip44d to run as a service? If the routes are there, this indicates you may have already made great … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Amprnet vpn

by Shawn Bush

Thanks for the detailed reasponce. I have work with the 44ripd daemon and I was recieveing the route information but that would be it. In thr startampr script that is show, it tries to setup mode ipip and that is just something that I couldn't figure out how to get a ubuntu vm to run with. In the ubuntu host, the ipip works just fine and there is a module for it. But the module isn't in the VM and I dont see why. But I was told ipensec is what I'm supposed to be using? I have no idea how to route diffrent protocols....

8 years, 4 months

2
1
0 0

Re: [44net] AMPR VPN

by lleachii＠aol.com

Sean, If you are using the AMPR VPN listed on the services wiki site, it uses the allocation given to its operator. You MUST setup an IPENCAP tunnel, or have your subnet routed over the global Internet via BGP. You might be able to have your allocation directed to the VPN operator (callsign - OH7LZB) and then arrange for him to route your IPs to the tunnel connection you have established between him. Please be advised, out of all the options, this one is not regularly supported. In … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

AMPR VPN

by Shawn Bush

I recently setup a AMPR NET VPN with openvpn in a OpenVZ container due to the fact I couldn't figure out how to get IPIP over to the VM. My question is this, I have a weird ip a 44.x.x.x number and I want to be able to use my given IP of 44.102.204.32, can I route my IP over the given one from the VPN? I'm using Ubuntu in the container and the routing for the VPN is working just fine. I want to setup linBPQ32 with this IP and start routing this way if I can. I'm pretty good with Linux, but … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

What ports needed to open for IPIP ?

by R P

Hi there We got permission to use our local university network for ham radio We plan to connect our DMR repeater to this network (some ports needed to be opened to allow the repeater to connect to the server) In adddiotion i want to place a AmprNET IPIP gateway there The University protected by firewall no outgoing and no incomming packets free flow.. What should I tell the IT person to open in order to allow gateway to run ? Does Firewall have IPIP protocole definition ? if … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

3
3
0 0

Re: [44net] 192.168.0.2 gateway

by Rob Janssen

> Subject: > Re: [44net] 192.168.0.2 gateway > From: > Mark Phillips <g7ltt(a)g7ltt.com> > Date: > 02/06/2017 02:34 PM > > To: > AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu> > > > I would say "no". > > Y'see, we don't know what kind of network things are riding over. the > network in question could be (for example) a mesh install configured > similar to that of the local cable company. The users get real addresses > but the … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

2
1
0 0

192.168.0.2 gateway

by Brian Kantor

I just spotted this entry in the latest encap file: route addprivate 44.74.0.128/28 encap 192.168.0.2 Unless you're doing something highly unusual, setting your gateway address in the portal to 192.168.0.2 probably is a mistake since it's not reachable from the Internet. - Brian

8 years, 4 months

6
6
0 0

Re: [44net] was Verifying the identities of IP coordinators

by Steve L

First I wanted to mention I am glad to read Bjorn's message about adding some content to the network. Keeping in contact is key. Be that a coordinator or any host on the amprnet. Seems every few months on here we are discussing how someone is sending out random packets, and a straight forward way to get a hold of people would be helpful. Some time back it was brought up to have a whois server or something like that. I bet I can guess the status of that. As for everyone having an ampr.org … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

7
7
0 0

PACCOMM TNC-320 Smoke

by vk1kw

Hello All, I recently had a power supply problem and it has let the smoke out of my PacComm TNC-320 packet modem. While I have the manual, I do not have a circuit diagram and only have a partial id on one of the cooked ICs U17. The partial number is MC xxxxx06P (I think) and is on the main board across the RS-232 D9 connector circuit. Could you check your circuit diagram, parts list or slide off the cover and have a look and let me know what the U17 IC is please? Many Thanks Rob VK1KW

8 years, 4 months

4
5
0 0

BGP announced gateways and Mikrotik RIPv2 AMPR Gateway Setup Script 3.0

by Marius Petrescu

Hello all, If you may have noticed, there is a recent IPIP tunnel with a 44net gateway (which you may have seen flapping on your Mikrotik routers - 44.130.120.0/24 via 44.130.120.65). This is a experimental setup to allow tunneling via BGP announced 44net gateways, with no real hosts there yet. Ampr-ripd newer than 1.13 will ignore this RIP broadcast (an update will be available soon). Our first step to make it run on Mikrotik routers (this will stop the route flapping): Announcing the … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

4
8
0 0

Re: [44net] Forum for Packet, AX.25

by Steve L

In addition to what has already been posted: the TAPR nos-bbs list http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

Forum for Packet, AX.25

by Adi Linden

Is there a good forum to discuss packet, AX.25 and such things? After some 20 years of abstinence from packet I am really interested in getting something going. In my area APRS is alive and well, but packet on VHF or UHF is dead and has been dead for a long time. Lots of equipment is still out there, such as KPC-3 and the like, just not being used. Although I am very interested in getting packet going again, I have no idea where to start. Got hardware to spare, but … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

3
2
0 0

44net IP Block for D-STAR Hosting Use

by Storer, Darren

Hi Chris, Life at Ofcom has overtaken amateur radio activity almost totally for the last 3 1/2 years but I'm starting to "emerge" again, I'm sure that you understand life's nasty way of getting in the way of hobby time. A number of D-STAR services are still hosted on my servers, including the central dsync reporting tool ( http://dsync.dstar.info/ is the public reporting page but there is an extensive admin portal too) and also some reflectors including REF006 ( http://ref006.dstargateway.org/… [View More]

8 years, 4 months

2
2
0 0

Re: [44net] BGPed Gateway

by Rob Janssen

> With the BGP advertisement my subnet is reachable via internet and can reach anywhere via internet. Other 44 networks can reach my subnet as long as they are also advertised via BGP or have appropriate NAT rules to allow internet access. I can reach any BGP advertised 44 net addresses. However, I should not be able to reach any non-BGP advertised 44 net addresses unless there is a gateway (at USCD?) that allows for access to IPIP only 44 networks from 44 networks. > I guess I don’t … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

1
0
0 0

BGPed Gateway

by Adi Linden

Hi, I received a 44 net allocation and am successfully advertising it to the internet via my ISP. I have been reading on the AMPRNet Wiki about IPIP tunnelling and Startampr. Are there best practices or anything else I need to be aware of before venturing into building the gateway? On a related note, I have been using OpenVPN to provide publicly routable /32 IP addresses to individual Windows PC. I don’t see support for IPIP on Windows, are there any other tunnelling methods … [View More]

8 years, 4 months

4
7
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net