All,
I am receiving emails for a "Hamgate DE" for a few months now. I am not in Germany and I do not recall signing up for these emails. I have inquired a few times before, but I keep getting them.
I'm noticing it's common in the Ham world to harvest emails without users' permission. Is "Hamegate DE" somehow affiliated with AMPRNet?
Thanks and 73,
- LynwoodKB3VWG
Hello 44Net Community,
I'd like to share an opportunity to get more involved with ARDC. We are
looking to hire a Communications Manager. *Please review the job
description below, or on our website* at:
https://www.ardc.net/ardc-is-hiring-communications-manager/. Please feel
free to pass this any personal contacts who might be interested.
Application instructions are at the bottom. For any questions, please
reach out to hr(a)ardc.net.
73,
Merideth, KK7BKI
*Overview*
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) is a California-based
private foundation with roots in amateur radio and the technology of
internet communication. Our mission is to support, promote, and enhance
digital communication and broader communication science and technology,
to promote Amateur Radio, scientific research, experimentation,
education, development, open access, and innovation in information and
communication technology. We do this through grantmaking and
administering a block of IP address space that is freely available to
the amateur radio community.
ARDC seeks an experienced Communications Manager to join our team. Under
the direction of the Executive Director, the Communications Manager will
serve a key role in delivering a comprehensive communications strategy.
This role requires a dynamic individual who is well-versed in writing
press releases and blog posts, as well as engaging with people on social
media, chat forums, and in-person networking opportunities at
conferences. An ideal candidate will be active in technology communities
– particularly those related to amateur radio, digital communications
science, free/libre open source software, and DIY culture. This is an
excellent opportunity for someone interested in doing communications
work in a philanthropic environment related to technology and education.
*Responsibilities:*
* *Communications Strategy:*Creating, implementing, and monitoring
communications and social media strategies, serving as
communications strategist and thought partner on a multidisciplinary
team.
* *Content Development:*Writing and editing primarily digital content
such as newsletters, blog posts, brochures, and public-facing formal
reports, as well as developing and implementing social media content.
* *Media Relations:*Serving as a media liaison; curating targeted
press lists of relevant media outlets, trade publications, and
publications reaching underrepresented groups in amateur radio,
digital communications, and technology more generally.
* *External Engagement and Events:*Participating in opportunities to
raise visibility of ARDC and seek new projects and communities worth
funding; managing and engagement on community forums.
* *Community Liaison:*Keeping an eye out for relevant events and info
that we need to be paying attention to, and educating the ARDC team
about what’s going on out in the world.
* *Presentation:*Working with the ARDC team to develop opportunities
and to deliver high-quality presentations, pitches, and interviews
in both virtual and in-person settings.
* *Brand Management:*Ensuring that all ARDC public-facing materials
are reflective of ourvalues <https://www.ardc.net/about/values/>and
standards. This includes copyediting, website updates and
maintenance (WordPress), and creating professional-looking, polished
works.
*
*Required Knowledge and Skills:*
* 3+ years’ experience in communications or public relations for a
scientific, educational organization such as a nonprofit, school, or
university.
* Demonstrated ability to develop an engagement strategy and complete
complex communications campaigns.
* Functional skills in Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, or other graphic
design software.
* Functional skills in video editing.
* Functional skills in working with WordPress (content management,
page / post design).
* Ability to follow a style guide / utilize a brand kit.
* Ability to quickly produce clear, concise, and compelling written
copy for audiences with varying degrees of technical knowledge.
* Ability to adapt to a continually evolving environment and thrive in
a collaborative workplace.
* Ability to manage, maintain and keep deadlines.
* Proficiency in using a range of technology, including LibreOffice
and Google Docs, and willingness to learn new technologies.
* Enthusiasm for or the desire to learn about the science and art of
amateur radio.
* A collaborative and relationship-building mindset.
*
*Preferred Knowledge & Skills:*
* Bachelor’s degree or equivalent, particularly in an area related to
technology, management, or communications.
* Experience working in startups or other new, growing organizations.
* Experience working with international colleagues and communities,
including working with translators where needed.
* Experience working with distributed teams and working remotely.
* Familiarity with and involvement in amateur radio, ideally including
the possession of an amateur radio license (which, if not already
possessed, should be obtained post-hire).
* Familiarity with (and love for) open source software and culture, as
well as technological innovation in general.
* Experience writing how-to documentation for technical subject matters.
* Experience with podcast guest appearances and / or conference
presentations.
* Experience working with nonprofits, foundations, or other
grantmaking organizations.
*Location:*
Remote, US.
Must be able to work with a team primarily based in the Pacific Standard
time zone.
/At this time, we are only able to extend employment to individuals
operating within US states and territories./
*Language:*
English proficiency required.
*Salary & Benefits:*
$65,000 – $85,000 / year, depending on experience and selection of a
32-hour workweek.
Benefits:
* Paid Time Off (PTO)
* Medical insurance premium stipend reimbursement
* Matched contribution retirement plan
* Option for 32-hour work week; some flexibility in work hours
*How to Apply:*
Please send a resume and cover letter to hr(a)ardc.net, as well as three
(3) work samples, such as press releases, social media accounts you’ve
curated, blog posts, newsletters, etc. Please send all files (including
cover letter) as a PDF attachment without spaces in the file name. For
example: jane-doe-cover-letter.pdf.
--
*Merideth Stroh* - KK7BKI
Operations Manager
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
www.ardc.net <https://www.ardc.net>
Hello 44Net Community,
I'd like to share an opportunity to get more involved with ARDC. We are
looking to hire a UX/UI Designer for a contract to work on an upgrade to
the Portal. *Please review the job description below, or on our website*
at: https://www.ardc.net/ardc-is-hiring-ux-ui-designer-contractor/.
Application instructions are at the bottom. For any questions, please
reach out to hr(a)ardc.net.
73,
Merideth, KK7BKI
*
Overview
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) is a California-based
private foundation that supports amateur radio and digital
communications. It does this in two primary ways: making grants, and
administering a block of IPv4 addresses known as 44Net, or the AMPRNet,
available at https://www.ardc.net/44net/. To get IP addresses from
44Net, users must submit a request, which they do so using the Portal.
Built many years ago, the Portal is in need of an upgrade.
ARDC is seeking a skilled UX/UI Designer/Developer (Contractor) in order
to make the new version the most user friendly that it can be. This will
include:
*
Documentation of our existing process and workflows for different
types of users (admins, coordinators, general users, etc.)
*
Front-end coding of the user interface.
Technical documentation is also included in this project.
Please note that branding is not included in this project. We have an
existing style guide that we will be working from at this time.
Required Skills
The ideal candidate will have demonstrated experience in the following
skills:
*
User research
*
A deep understanding and recent experience in creating Web Interfaces
*
An eye for detail and page layout / design to perfect the UX
*
Excellent knowledge and experience with HTML5 and CSS3
*
Excellent knowledge of the Bootstrap framework, in particular
version 5.2
*
A working knowledge of JS, in particular JQuery
*
At least a basic understanding of PHP
*
An eye for clean and well-formatted code
*
Technical and user-facing documentation
Additionally, candidates must be able to supply a portfolio of work.
Nice-to-Have Skills
The following skills will also be helpful for this project:
*
User flow development
*
Knowledge of Laravel, ideally version 9/10
*
Familiarity with Blade templates
*
Recent experience of team working / collaboration
*
Experience with the PHPStorm IDE or an IDE that is compatible with
PHPStorm
*
Experience with github / gitlab / git
*
High-level understanding of computer networking
*
Knowledge of and experience with amateur radio
Location & Language
*
This work is remote, and the contractor may be located anywhere in
the world.
*
Contractor must be able to participate primarily in meetings with
our UK-based IT lead (GMT) but also the occasional meeting with our
US staff, who are based on the west coast (PDT).
*
Advanced written and spoken proficiency in the English language is
essential
Applying
If you are interested in this project, please submit your portfolio and
a brief statement of interest to hr(a)ardc.net. If we agree it looks to be
a good fit, we’ll reach out to you to share more about the project and
request a bid.
*
--
*Merideth Stroh* - KK7BKI
Operations Manager
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
www.ardc.net <https://www.ardc.net>
Hey All!
I have a feeling I know the answer to my question already, but I figured I'd ask anyways:
Is going through Chris the only way to get updates to RADB records?
Rather than emailing him directly to make a change is there a better avenue? (Submit a ticket through the portal perhaps?)
I've been trying to get the origin AS updated on my allocation for a few months now with no luck.
Hi Everyone,
I am trying to get in touch with the following members, if you are on this list please can you email me?
If anyone knows how to get in touch with anyone on the list, please drop me an email:
AH6BW
HF1L
N5QM
LZ4NY
N0OTZ
CT7ABP
PJ2BR
TA7W
Thank you.
73,
Chris - G1FEF
I am looking for some directions on setting this up with a cellular Hotspot modem.
I am trying to get this to work with a DStar gateway. I have looked at the wiki for the setting up the MikroTik route
Sincerely
David Harris
KE6GAE
Sent from my Galaxy
I got a Fail2Ban alert at work this morning from one of my data center
servers .....
Hi,
The IP 44.210.18.217 has just been banned by Fail2Ban after
5 attempts against apache-noscript.
Here is more information about 44.210.18.217 :
[Querying whois.arin.net]
[whois.arin.net]
#
# ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use # available
at: https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/whois/tou/
#
# If you see inaccuracies in the results, please report at #
https://www.arin.net/resources/registry/whois/inaccuracy_reporting/
#
# Copyright 1997-2023, American Registry for Internet Numbers, Ltd.
#
#
# Query terms are ambiguous. The query is assumed to be:
# "n 44.210.18.217"
#
# Use "?" to get help.
#
Amazon.com, Inc. AMAZO-4 (NET-44-192-0-0-1) 44.192.0.0 - 44.255.255.255
Amazon Data Services NoVa AMAZON-IAD (NET-44-192-0-0-2) 44.192.0.0 -
44.223.255.255
I notice that ampr.org is being redirected to ardc.net, which makes
sense. However, the portal doesn't appear to be working. Neither
portal.ampr.org or portal.ardc.net resolve, and the links haven't been
updated.
Any news on what's happening there?
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
Hi All,
Please be aware that we are making some changes to our primary nameserver, both for ampr.org and 44.in-addr.arpa, the reverse zones. We are of course doing our best to make changes that will not affect anything, but inevitably gremlins can creep in if something unexpected occurs.
So if you do spot any issues, please drop me an email with as much detail as possible so we can investigate. Hopefully everything will go smoothly though (famous last words!).
Thanks & 73,
Chris - G1FEF
Hello all.
Could I get someone to confirm if they can reach 44.63.63.193 please.
I just transitioned over to a new gateway device.
Thanks all
Harold
K7ILO
I have been using a VPN server through my VULTR account to serve up my 44.x.x.x range. I would like to find a way to use DNS server on my VULTR VM to announce and support a static IP configuration on client machines vs the VPN solution. Has anyone accomplished this?
Thank you,
Keith AI6BX
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
I've inquired here a few times. I went to check the wiki as I beleive someone made the requisite files to build and submit (I think I added the info); but the Wiki seems down, and there a grant submission page in its place.- Lynwood
-------- Original message --------From: Matt Peterson via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: 1/27/23 19:45 (GMT-05:00) To: lleachii(a)aol.com Cc: Harold via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Subject: [44net] Re: ampr-ripd 2.4.1 / openwrt Lynwood,Has there ever been an effort to get a pre-compiled package(s) into OpenWRT?--MattOn Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 3:17 AM lleachii--- via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:Harold,At https://downloads.openwrt.com - on the same page that you find the image for your router.At the bottom of the page, there's a download for your relevant Software Development Kit (SDK). Everything is included in the SDK.The SDKs are made to work on Linux x86_64. The only method is to cross compile. The OpenWrt Wiki has a cross-compile page. All linked on the AMPR Wiki page.73, Lynwood KB3VWG -------- Original message --------From: Harold via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: 1/27/23 02:37 (GMT-05:00) To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org Subject: [44net] ampr-ripd 2.4.1 / openwrt Ok I know there are A LOT of post from the PAST about compiling ampr-ripd for OpenWRT but for the last few days, I have been racking my brain tryingto get this thing to compile for the router that I would like to use for my gateway but I think I broke my brain....I know Lynwood has done some extensive posting on this but things are just not working out for me. Many different errors when trying different processes.So, I would like to ask...1st, for those that are cross-compiling, what development environment are you using such as, linux version, the dependencies needed for that environment to work, and what versionof ampr-ripd are we cross-compiling for use in OpenWRT? I would like to build the setup as someone who is successful with these processes.Once that is done, Ill move on to the next step and try my hand at compiling ampr-ripd again for my target device.Baby steps.Thanks for any direction with this...HaroldK7ILO_______________________________________________44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
Harold,At https://downloads.openwrt.com - on the same page that you find the image for your router.At the bottom of the page, there's a download for your relevant Software Development Kit (SDK). Everything is included in the SDK.The SDKs are made to work on Linux x86_64. The only method is to cross compile. The OpenWrt Wiki has a cross-compile page. All linked on the AMPR Wiki page.73, Lynwood KB3VWG
-------- Original message --------From: Harold via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: 1/27/23 02:37 (GMT-05:00) To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org Subject: [44net] ampr-ripd 2.4.1 / openwrt Ok I know there are A LOT of post from the PAST about compiling ampr-ripd for OpenWRT but for the last few days, I have been racking my brain tryingto get this thing to compile for the router that I would like to use for my gateway but I think I broke my brain....I know Lynwood has done some extensive posting on this but things are just not working out for me. Many different errors when trying different processes.So, I would like to ask...1st, for those that are cross-compiling, what development environment are you using such as, linux version, the dependencies needed for that environment to work, and what versionof ampr-ripd are we cross-compiling for use in OpenWRT? I would like to build the setup as someone who is successful with these processes.Once that is done, Ill move on to the next step and try my hand at compiling ampr-ripd again for my target device.Baby steps.Thanks for any direction with this...HaroldK7ILO_______________________________________________44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
Ok I know there are A LOT of post from the PAST about compiling ampr-ripd for OpenWRT but for the last few days, I have been racking my brain trying
to get this thing to compile for the router that I would like to use for my gateway but I think I broke my brain....
I know Lynwood has done some extensive posting on this but things are just not working out for me. Many different errors when trying different processes.
So, I would like to ask...
1st, for those that are cross-compiling, what development environment are you using such as, linux version, the dependencies needed for that environment to work, and what version
of ampr-ripd are we cross-compiling for use in OpenWRT?
I would like to build the setup as someone who is successful with these processes.
Once that is done, Ill move on to the next step and try my hand at compiling ampr-ripd again for my target device.
Baby steps.
Thanks for any direction with this...
Harold
K7ILO
I was recently seeing a *lot* of scanning traffic from some of these
censys-scanner.com IPs on my AMPR subnet. Personally, I consider crap
like this as an attack yet people and companies think what they are
doing is completely OK. Grrrr.. I imagine a lot of other AMPR subnets
are also getting scanned which I don't think is OK. Maybe we can get
their subnets BLOCKED at the UCSD Internet gateway?
https://support.censys.io/hc/en-us/articles/360043177092-from-faq
--David
KI6ZHD
* I don't wish to opt out. I want the scanning. What I don't want are DDoS attacks, totally unrelated to the research.* Those are firewall instructions, the discussion was about AMPRGW blocking them.I must have been unclear, apologies.- Lynwood
Should I be able to ping my 44net address (44.135.148.128/27) from anywhere on the internet? I'm running a dxspider on 44.135.148.130 but I can't seem to connect to it from the outside world (i.e. my work). I can ping the external IP my EdgeRouter-X but not the 44net one.
Thanks
Stephen Atkins
VE6CPU/VE6STA/VE6SU
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
Does anyone preferably around the west half of the US have a wireguard
gateway they would be willing to let me point at for my allocation?
Thanks,
Scott
Hi folks,
Our community meeting starts in just under an hour!
Please find all info, including Zoom information, below.
cc'ing our Communications Manager, Dan, and our Operations Manager,
Merideth, in case you have any issues joining.
Many thanks,
Rosy
// MEETING INFO
Saturday, Jan. 21, 2023
1800 UTC (10am PT / 1pm ET / 6pm GMT / 7pm CET)
Topics:
* ARDC’s 2022 grants
* Introducing our new advisory committee members
* Report on the recent assessment of 44Net usage and technology <-- !!!
// REPORTS!
2022 Annual Report - bit.ly/ARDC-2022
44Net Assessment - bit.ly/44Net-Assessment
slides will be made available after the meeting
// ZOOM INFO
URL:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87963536922?pwd=ZXNUT0JZaWhhQVRpNWt3SVdSeDhKZz09
Meeting ID: 879 6353 6922
Passcode: 88001
One tap mobile
+12532050468,,87963536922#,,,,*88001#
US +12532158782,,87963536922#,,,,*88001# US (Tacoma)
To dial in, use one of the following numbers:
+1 253 205 0468 US
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 719 359 4580 US
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 360 209 5623 US
+1 386 347 5053 US
+1 507 473 4847 US
+1 564 217 2000 US
+1 646 931 3860 US
+1 689 278 1000 US
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 305 224 1968 US
+1 309 205 3325 US
Meeting ID: 879 6353 6922
Passcode: 88001
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kd4Rq0ZbDx
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
Hi all,
When I sent out notice of the community meeting start time yesterday, I
realize that it had the wrong start time in UTC. It will start at 1800,
not 1700 as listed in the previous email. Apologies for any
inconvenience, and thanks to everyone who let me know about the mistake.
73,
Rosy
// MEETING INFO
Saturday, Jan. 21, 2023
1800 UTC (10am PT / 1pm ET / 6pm GMT / 7pm CET)
Topics:
* ARDC’s 2022 grants
* Introducing our new advisory committee members
* Report on the recent assessment of 44Net usage and technology <-- !!!
Please register here: https://www.ampr.org/community-meeting-registration/
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
Hello to those on the list.
Spectrum (formerly Charter) laid new fiber in my neighborhood and is
offering a pretty enticing deal, especially considering I'm on a vdsl based
service now. My current ISP has a router with a "pass-through" DMZ mode,
which I use to get protocol 4 to a Ubiquiti router that runs ampr-ripd.
Is there anyone on the list that is using a relatively new service from
Spectrum and is able to pass protocol 4 for amprnet?
Thanks and 73,
Lee K5DAT
Hello 44Net!
I am so delighted to share that the results from the 44Net assessment
are going to be released very soon, just in time for our Jan. 2023
Community Meeting. Please come if you can!
Saturday, Jan. 21, 2023
1700 UTC (10am PT / 1pm ET / 6pm GMT / 7pm CET)
Topics:
* ARDC’s 2022 grants
* Introducing our new advisory committee members
* Report on the recent assessment of 44Net usage and technology <-- !!!
Please register here: https://www.ampr.org/community-meeting-registration/
We'll send out the Zoom information a couple of days before the meeting,
and all reports as soon as we are able.
As always, we'll record the meeting for anyone who can't be there, but I
certainly hope you can!
Looking forward,
Rosy
PS As I started to write this message, Let the Sunshine In by 5th
Dimension came on, which pretty accurately reflects the happiness I feel
about the 44Net Assessment report getting done. Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxNvFVI2G38
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
Hello all,
Very glad to find out this community existed and this was all possible.
Back in October of last year, I had requested a small network block, like a /30 or the like. It was allocated, but after talking with other members of the list I wanted to look into direct BGP announcement, which would require a /24. I released the /30 allocation and have updated my request to be a direct /24 request now, request ID 7127. Is there anything I should do to help this process along? Please let me know if there is any other info I can provide, and thanks for this service.
Cheers,
Wil - VA6WTR
Hey y'all! I wanna set up a DHCP server on my gateway to hand my 44.x.x.x IPs to my various ham radio devices and provide them with internet access, as well as direct access to the outside world, allowing them to be accessed remotely via the 44.x.x.x IPs, is this possible?
Hey y'all. I'm having difficulty setting up my gateway using IPIP. I followed all instructions to set up a gateway, but the Linux hardware I'm using as a gateway is stuck on "Waiting for RIPv2 broadcasts" for a very long time and is not progressing. I'm not sure if it's something I did wrong or if I'm forgetting something or if it's some other issue that's beyond my control. Can someone please shed some light on what might cause it to hang and not progress any further?
Hi,
We are working with https://ispace-inc.com to develop a plan.
JN1LFD
--
Kazuhiko OHO --- jn1lfd(a)gmail.com
於保 和彦
Content provided within this e-mail including any attachments, is for the use of the intended recipients and may contain me and/or Packet Radio Users Group (PRUG) restricted information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, or distribution of this communication in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply email or by telephone and delete the communication in its entirety.
2022年12月22日 4:07 +0900、Terence Theijn <terence(a)theijn.nl>のメール:
> Hi,
>
> did you try to contact ISISPACE?
> https://www.isispace.nl/
>
> They are very familiar with space related missions and are also very familiar with amateur radio.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Terence (PD3T)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kazuhiko OHO via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
> Reply-To: Kazuhiko OHO <jn1lfd(a)gmail.com>
> To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
> Subject: [44net] Lunar Repeater Installation Project
> Date: 12/21/2022 04:22:54 PM
>
> This may not be very appropriate for the topic here.
> In that case, please turn it off.
>
> The Packet Radio Users' Group in Japan is now planning to install a
> repeater or transponder on the moon.
>
> Anyone familiar with space engineering?
>
> Please contact us. We are looking forward to hearing from you.
>
> Best Regaurds,
> Kaz - JN1LFD
> --
> Kazuhiko OHO --- jn1lfd(a)gmail.com
> 於保 和彦
> tel:+81 466 23 4200
> cell:+81 80 5515 4200
> Content provided within this e-mail including any attachments, is for
> the use of the intended recipients and may contain me and/or Packet
> Radio Users Group (PRUG) restricted information. Any unauthorized use,
> disclosure, or distribution of this communication in whole or in part
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> notify the sender by reply email or by telephone and delete the
> communication in its entirety.
> _______________________________________________
> 44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
This may not be very appropriate for the topic here.
In that case, please turn it off.
The Packet Radio Users' Group in Japan is now planning to install a
repeater or transponder on the moon.
Anyone familiar with space engineering?
Please contact us. We are looking forward to hearing from you.
Best Regaurds,
Kaz - JN1LFD
--
Kazuhiko OHO --- jn1lfd(a)gmail.com
於保 和彦
tel:+81 466 23 4200
cell:+81 80 5515 4200
Content provided within this e-mail including any attachments, is for
the use of the intended recipients and may contain me and/or Packet
Radio Users Group (PRUG) restricted information. Any unauthorized use,
disclosure, or distribution of this communication in whole or in part
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by reply email or by telephone and delete the
communication in its entirety.
--
Kazuhiko OHO --- jn1lfd(a)gmail.com
於保 和彦
tel:+81 466 23 4200
cell:+81 80 5515 4200
Content provided within this e-mail including any attachments, is for
the use of the intended recipients and may contain me and/or Packet
Radio Users Group (PRUG) restricted information. Any unauthorized use,
disclosure, or distribution of this communication in whole or in part
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by reply email or by telephone and delete the
communication in its entirety.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Kazuhiko OHO <jn1lfd(a)gmail.com>
Date: 2022年12月22日(木) 1:13
Subject: Re: Lunar Repeater
To: Lou Scalpati <lscalpati(a)gmail.com>
Roger,
VY thanks to UR words.
We have not even had a fare meeting with https://ispace.com/ yet,
and are currently in the process of identifying equipment to be
installed on the Moon,
weight, volume, power consumption, etc.
This is not a secret project at all, so please feel free to spread the word.
And please laugh at us when we fail. lol
We want adrenaline rush jobs!
Best Regards,
Kaz - JN1LFD
https://www.prug.com/
--
Kazuhiko OHO --- jn1lfd(a)gmail.com
於保 和彦
tel:+81 466 23 4200
cell:+81 80 5515 4200
Content provided within this e-mail including any attachments, is for
the use of the intended recipients and may contain me and/or Packet
Radio Users Group (PRUG) restricted information. Any unauthorized use,
disclosure, or distribution of this communication in whole or in part
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by reply email or by telephone and delete the
communication in its entirety.
2022年12月22日(木) 1:03 Lou Scalpati <lscalpati(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Kazuhiko San,
> I saw a forwarded copy of your post about the lunar repeater. Although I do not have any experience in space engineering, I am willing to help in any way I can that would benefit the mission. Testing, research or any other tasks that would allow more experienced people to do more impactful work.
>
> 73
> Lou KI5FTY
>
All,
Regarding todays discussion on DNS entries: I would urge everyone to please take a deep breath and really consider your reply before actually posting to this mailing list. Some of the replies i’ve seen today were unprofessional, unkind and frankly made me feel embarrassed.
This is a forum for the technical discussion of 44Net related topics, if you are not posting constructive and useful technical advice, please refrain from posting. Ludovic made a mistake, an honest mistake due to the language barrier. Sure, he jumped the gun and should not have deleted the DNS entries as he did, but he did not deserve some of the comments that subsequently appeared.
For future reference please restrict sending DNS updates to the addresses directly allocated to you. If anyone has a requirement for updating DNS entries outside of their own allocated address space, or is unable to contact their local coordinator, please reach out to me.
Thank you.
73,
Chris - G1FEF
For those that use section abbreviations in hierarchical addressing or
message routing filters, these new designators for the Canadian sections
might be needed.
The RAC Field Organization will be reorganized into the following
sections effective January 1, 2023:
Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
Nova Scotia (NS)
Prince Edward Island (PE)
New Brunswick (NB) – the Maritime Section (MAR) will be abolished.
Quebec (QC)
Ontario East (ONE)
Golden Horseshoe (GH) – currently called Greater Toronto Area (GTA).
Ontario South (ONS)
Ontario North (ONN)
Manitoba (MB)
Saskatchewan (SK)
Alberta (AB)
British Columbia (BC)
Territories (TER) – Northwest Territories, Yukon and Nunavut will be
combined into one section.
--
73 de N2NOV
n2nov(a)n2nov.ampr.org
n2nov(a)n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam
Does anyone know who the Arizona coordinator is and how to get a hold of
them? Do we need a new coordinator? I might be able to help out.
Thanks,
Scott
Hello Frédéric
This may be a bit off topic...
Installed successfully HamPi_v3.0.1_64bit.img.xz on RPi4B.
I was driven by curiosity rather than necessity.
WSJT-X and JTDX compiles/installs O.K.
Installation of HamPi is exactly the same
like for other RPi images. No tricks needed.
From my point of view HamPi is full of various stuff.
Myself I prefer to install only programs that I need.
Therefore 2022-04-04-raspios-bullseye-arm64.img.xz is perfectly O.K.
or 2022-04-04-raspios-bullseye-armhf-full.img.xz
In case of uncertainty which version to install see here:
https://symless.com/synergy-help/do-i-install-armhf-or-arm64-on-my-raspberr…
Short answer: 64bit processor, install arm64 OS.
I do have SDR radio which is not supported by RPi
and therefore I can't check RPi4B in action, Hi!
However YMMV...
Best regards.
--
Tom - SP2L
------------------------------------
It is nice to be important.
But it is more important to be nice!
Nobody is mistaken - so do I.
On 25.11.2022 22:01, Frederic Zulian via 44net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> - Did anyone successfully install HamPi_v3.1_32bit.img.xz with an PI?
> No boot with me.
>
> - Is there an hamradio that actually and really uses an PI on the
> Hamnet network or is it a "Fake" ?
>
> What is your best solution to use HAMNET ?
> An repackaged old PC with a Debian ?
> Any ideas ?
> I’d like to use something other than a Mikrotik :-)
>
> F1SXO
> Frédéric ZULIAN
>
--
Ta wiadomość e-mail została sprawdzona pod kątem wirusów przez oprogramowanie antywirusowe Avast.
www.avast.com
Hi,
If W1DTX is reading this, or if anyone knows how to contact them, please can you get in touch.
I have attempted to reply to your message you left on the portal, but your Winlink email address is bouncing any attempt at contacting you. I think you need to add my email address to your “accept list” at Winlink.
73,
Chris - G1FEF
Hello,
- Did anyone successfully install HamPi_v3.1_32bit.img.xz with an PI?
No boot with me.
- Is there an hamradio that actually and really uses an PI on the Hamnet
network or is it a "Fake" ?
What is your best solution to use HAMNET ?
An repackaged old PC with a Debian ?
Any ideas ?
I’d like to use something other than a Mikrotik :-)
F1SXO
Frédéric ZULIAN
Hello,
I'm setting up my 44NET gateway at home.
According to the different wiki documents, i need have some of my assigned
IPs registered as A record under ampr.org, so that AMPRGW(169.228.34.84)
could allow the traffic from the Internet.
I tried to reach out to my local co-ordinator, which is "AMPRNET", on the
Portal. Tried a few times, but didn't get any response. I'm wondering if I
reached out from the wrong channel.
So just want to ask, what's the correct way to request a DNS record under
ampr.org?
Many Thanks,
Billy Yao
I was wondering if you had considered looking at a 4 in 6 tunnel support. I
know that it may seem backwards with a lot of things moving to native v6
but the 44 net is a great resource for hams. One example of why I can see
needing this is a lot of providers, specifically wireless, are doing a
double or triple NAT of their own ipv4 address space. While this is OK for
most internet activities it is not good to support inbound connections. You
do however get a native IPV6 address that is not nated and fully routable.
Having a headend location to support a 4 in 6 tunnel would help a lot of
folks. I do support large networks as part of my day job and would be
willing to help set up and support if you wanted to take this on.
Thanks,
Scott
Last week I submitted the below list to the database and technical
managers to
point out a major discrepancy between the portal's gateways entries and
what is
actually being sent out in the encap.txt file or broadcast. This would
explain
why certain subnets are having trouble being routed. If a system does
not get
the route data then the connection goes nowhere. After some thought and some
input from a few, I suspect that the subnets that are dropped are actually
using a dynamic address FQDN in their portal entry as opposed to a truly
numeric dotted quad address. Maybe the stations listed below can verify my
guess.
Gateway Subnets
104.168.68.132 44.63.0.2/32 K8SEL
44.63.7.72/29 K8SEL
109.28.24.17 44.168.51.64/27 F4GKN
44.168.53.0/27 F4GKN
44.168.253.224/29 F4GKN
44.168.254.48/29 F4GKN
124.122.92.46 44.63.16.0/28 E20FWF
136.37.17.18 44.46.23.0/24 N0UUU
138.197.132.28 44.135.68.32/28 VA2XOR
156.245.12.86 44.185.105.0/24 LZ5AE
156.245.12.86 44.185.106.0/24 LZ5AE
166.70.154.77 44.40.129.0/28 KR1P
173.73.200.59 44.60.72.0/26 K6CRS
179.223.0.212 44.63.16.112/28 OK2PEN
181.31.245.39 44.153.81.0/24 LU7ABF
184.175.49.98 44.135.96.32/29 VE3IGN
184.65.186.101 44.135.179.16/29 VA7VH
185.214.140.37 44.131.189.0/29 M0NFE
188.29.132.86 44.131.213.48/29 G7OAH
189.27.214.32 44.174.43.0/24 PY3NZ
190.97.49.15 44.153.55.0/24 LU7ABF
44.153.54.0/28 LU7ABF
44.153.54.16/30 LU7ABF
44.153.54.21/32 LU7ABF
44.153.54.22/32 LU7ABF
44.153.54.23/32 LU7ABF
44.153.54.24/30 LU7ABF
44.153.54.28/30 LU7ABF
44.153.54.32/27 LU7ABF
44.153.54.64/26 LU7ABF
44.153.54.128/25 LU7ABF
2.52.74.125 44.138.5.0/24 4Z4ZQ
200.170.160.30 44.174.3.0/24 PY3NZ
200.9.149.130 44.174.75.0/24 PU1JDI
207.6.173.135 44.135.179.24/29 VE7MOV
207.6.202.87 44.135.173.0/25 VE7KI
23.152.224.241 44.56.26.0/29 KC9UHI
23.17.148.200 44.135.151.0/25 VE6RBN
23.202.231.167 44.70.40.192/27 KD8SEP
35.81.180.32 44.63.32.0/27 BG2LFQ
45.142.157.116 44.16.10.0/24 W1LMS
47.152.64.117 44.18.50.0/28 AI6BX
67.253.138.181 44.118.2.64/29 N1XP
68.77.136.223 44.98.12.8/29 K4BFH
68.99.7.29 44.90.128.0/24 KD7GSW
69.204.159.14 44.68.220.0/28 N2KGC
44.68.222.0/28 N2KGC
71.69.152.108 44.74.13.0/28 KO4VEB
75.74.169.23 44.98.7.16/28 KI4CTI
76.177.163.117 44.48.210.0/29 N9LYA
77.251.33.247 44.137.33.48/28 PA3DFN
79.113.110.222 44.182.24.0/24 YO2DRC
79.184.102.217 44.165.84.0/30 SP5E
80.99.198.180 44.156.64.0/24 HG5APZ
81.187.62.66 44.131.253.0/29 M6LNS
82.69.152.109 44.131.252.0/28 M0NZO
85.201.220.87 44.144.5.0/24 ON8CB
86.213.122.209 44.151.24.5/32 F1OYP
91.195.240.117 44.135.81.64/28 W2MAT
92.83.190.168 44.182.36.0/24 YO3VDD
99.83.154.118 44.24.172.40/29 KG7PNQ
--
73 de N2NOV
n2nov(a)n2nov.ampr.org
n2nov(a)n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam
I'm curious as to the validity and source of your list/data...
I am associated neither with the 44.56.26.0/29 subnet nor the gateway at
23.152.224.241.
--
matt
kc9uhi
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, 15:17 Charles Hargrove via 44net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
> Last week I submitted the below list to the database and technical
> managers to
> point out a major discrepancy between the portal's gateways entries and
> what is
> actually being sent out in the encap.txt file or broadcast. This would
> explain
> why certain subnets are having trouble being routed. If a system does
> not get
> the route data then the connection goes nowhere. After some thought and some
>
>
> input from a few, I suspect that the subnets that are dropped are actually
> using a dynamic address FQDN in their portal entry as opposed to a truly
> numeric dotted quad address. Maybe the stations listed below can verify my
> guess.
>
>
> Gateway Subnets
> 104.168.68.132 44.63.0.2/32 K8SEL
> 44.63.7.72/29 K8SEL
> 109.28.24.17 44.168.51.64/27 F4GKN
> 44.168.53.0/27 F4GKN
> 44.168.253.224/29 F4GKN
> 44.168.254.48/29 F4GKN
> 124.122.92.46 44.63.16.0/28 E20FWF
> 136.37.17.18 44.46.23.0/24 N0UUU
> 138.197.132.28 44.135.68.32/28 VA2XOR
> 156.245.12.86 44.185.105.0/24 LZ5AE
> 156.245.12.86 44.185.106.0/24 LZ5AE
> 166.70.154.77 44.40.129.0/28 KR1P
> 173.73.200.59 44.60.72.0/26 K6CRS
> 179.223.0.212 44.63.16.112/28 OK2PEN
> 181.31.245.39 44.153.81.0/24 LU7ABF
> 184.175.49.98 44.135.96.32/29 VE3IGN
> 184.65.186.101 44.135.179.16/29 VA7VH
> 185.214.140.37 44.131.189.0/29 M0NFE
> 188.29.132.86 44.131.213.48/29 G7OAH
> 189.27.214.32 44.174.43.0/24 PY3NZ
> 190.97.49.15 44.153.55.0/24 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.0/28 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.16/30 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.21/32 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.22/32 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.23/32 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.24/30 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.28/30 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.32/27 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.64/26 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.128/25 LU7ABF
> 2.52.74.125 44.138.5.0/24 4Z4ZQ
> 200.170.160.30 44.174.3.0/24 PY3NZ
> 200.9.149.130 44.174.75.0/24 PU1JDI
> 207.6.173.135 44.135.179.24/29 VE7MOV
> 207.6.202.87 44.135.173.0/25 VE7KI
> 23.152.224.241 44.56.26.0/29 KC9UHI
> 23.17.148.200 44.135.151.0/25 VE6RBN
> 23.202.231.167 44.70.40.192/27 KD8SEP
> 35.81.180.32 44.63.32.0/27 BG2LFQ
> 45.142.157.116 44.16.10.0/24 W1LMS
> 47.152.64.117 44.18.50.0/28 AI6BX
> 67.253.138.181 44.118.2.64/29 N1XP
> 68.77.136.223 44.98.12.8/29 K4BFH
> 68.99.7.29 44.90.128.0/24 KD7GSW
> 69.204.159.14 44.68.220.0/28 N2KGC
> 44.68.222.0/28 N2KGC
> 71.69.152.108 44.74.13.0/28 KO4VEB
> 75.74.169.23 44.98.7.16/28 KI4CTI
> 76.177.163.117 44.48.210.0/29 N9LYA
> 77.251.33.247 44.137.33.48/28 PA3DFN
> 79.113.110.222 44.182.24.0/24 YO2DRC
> 79.184.102.217 44.165.84.0/30 SP5E
> 80.99.198.180 44.156.64.0/24 HG5APZ
> 81.187.62.66 44.131.253.0/29 M6LNS
> 82.69.152.109 44.131.252.0/28 M0NZO
> 85.201.220.87 44.144.5.0/24 ON8CB
> 86.213.122.209 44.151.24.5/32 F1OYP
> 91.195.240.117 44.135.81.64/28 W2MAT
> 92.83.190.168 44.182.36.0/24 YO3VDD
> 99.83.154.118 44.24.172.40/29 KG7PNQ
>
> --
> 73 de N2NOV
> n2nov(a)n2nov.ampr.org
> n2nov(a)n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam
> _______________________________________________
> 44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
>
To all...
This won't happen again...
Somehow the very first address in my contact list was appended to the email
address list, and that address was for 44NET.
I have changed the contact name to put it elsewhere in the list, and added a
new ( dummy ) contact to the top of the list, with my own email address in
it.
If it happens again, it will be sent to me... apologies again... all thumbs
here tonight.
Bob S.
To all... apologies AGAIN...
I'm starting to think I've got a virus or something... this message was NOT
intended for 44NET, but for a ham in a YouTube video.
Some how... and honestly I have no idea how... the 44NET address was
appended to the intended addressee.
There must be some keystroke sequence I accidentally hit that appended the
address, and I just didn't notice it before I sent it.
Again... apologies to all... I'll figure out a way to prevent this from
happening again...
Bob S
.
Bob Simmons / WB6EYV here...
Comment on the YT video, agree there is too much venom and vitriolic out
there.
Those people are just part of the noise. QSY or notch them out.
Too many people ( in the U.S. ) use freedom of speech the same way a
constipated person uses a laxative. and the results are equally unsavory in
both cases.
I could have replied in YT comment but figure this email would be better to
get attention.
Sorry for the gabby length, but you hit a nerve in that video.
+++++++++
I almost never get on the air, there are very few hams I would really want
to meet or talk to these days.
The idea that increasing the population of hams will somehow "improve" ham
radio is ( IMHO ) "rubbish". we need quality. and / or substance. not just
quantity
In my own defense, my own website ( I make and sell DF stuff ) is here : (
if you are curious )
www.picodopp.net
+++++++++
People who say "ham radio is for this" or "ham radio is for that" are (
usually ) full of shit. pardon my French.
Everybody has an opinion, but the ONLY opinion that really matters is the
opinion OF THE GOVERNMENT, as expressed IN THE LAWS..because THEY are the
ONLY ones who can issue the licenses.
In the U.S that means the FCC.
Take a look at the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47, Part 97, SubPart
A, Section 97.1, titled "Basis and purpose" for the ONLY description of ham
radio's REAL "purpose" that matters a tinker's damn.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-97/subpart
-A/section-97.1
A.K.A. "47CFR97.1"
This section is the very first part of the regulations governing ham radio
in the United States. Part 97. and the very first topic is a statement of
the 5 reasons why amateur radio is "allowed" to exist.
++++++
It's not a "right". it's a privilege. ( in the eyes of the law, anyway )
There are only 3 hobbies ( well, maybe 4 if you include drone flights ) that
require a federal license in the United States.
One is flying a light aircraft. ( Cessna, Piper, etc. ) You need an FAA
license for that.
One is collecting machine guns. ( yes, you can do that.) You need an ATF
license for that.
One is operating a ham radio. You need an FCC license for that.
+++++++
I should point out also that an amateur license authorizes the license
holder to BUILD AND OPERATE their own radio equipment. including
transmitters. without any other explicit authority from the government.
That is something that even multi - billion dollar corporations can't
legally do.
They can't even advertise a cell phone in the U.S. or take orders for them.
unless it has ALREADY been authorized for commercial service. by the FCC.
. and the FCC WILL put a stop to it, if they catch someone doing that.
+++++++
47CFR97.1 identifies the five REASONS why the government "allows" its
citizens to own and operate ham radios.
NONE of those reasons revolve around the "rights' of the citizens. they ONLY
mention the benefits that the amateur community can provide. to the
government.
Specifically. those benefits that are clearly "in the public interest, or
serve the public convenience, or public necessity"
++++++
Four of those five reason are now ( largely ) obsolete, and the fifth is
"tenuous" at best. ( as I see it )
Those reasons were all defined in the Communications Act of 1927. so think
Titanic disaster and WW1 military radio operators
++++++
I should also point out that amateur radio operation has been "suspended" in
the past by the federal government. and it didn't take much to do it, just a
simple majority "act of congress".
During World War 1 and again in WW2, all operations were TOTALLY suspended
"for the duration"..
They can take it all away whenever they want. and they already have.. Twice.
so don't think for a nanosecond that we hams "own" these airwaves.
Look at what happened after the terrroist attacks on 9/11/2001. the airspace
in the ENTIRE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES was EMPTIED 100%... IMMEDIATELY.
EVERYWHERE.
They can do it. and they WILL. INSTANTLY. if they have a good reason for it.
As far as the government is concerned, our amateur equipment is only
slightly more important than garage door openers, or R/C radios to operate
cheap Taiwan toy cars.
++++++++
So. the next time some smart ass starts to read the riot act to you. point
out 47CFR97.1 to them and ask them to comment on it.
If they balk at that suggestion, point out to them that signing their FCC
license means that they are LEGALLY OBLIGATED to KNOW and OBEY ALL the
regulations pertaining to their license.
And that ( strictly ) means everything in 47CFR97. ALL of it.
++++++++
For the record, I do think amateur radio is worthwhile, it provides a venue
for people to educate themselves about electronics. and modern civilizations
needs people with at kind of knowledge.
We just can't rely on a handful of geniuses to support all the technology
we use in our modern world. we need foot soldiers who aren't afraid to get
their fingers dirty.
The only other "official" venue for this kind of education is colleges. and
they ( in my opinion ) are years behind the curve, as a general rule.
++++++
By the time a subject is sufficiently "mature" to be offered as a course of
instruction in a college, it generally is at least 10 years behind the
current state of the industry.
Wilbur and Orville Wright didn't get an aeronautics degree before they
invented sustained, controlled flight.
The true leaders in every new field didn't have degrees in those fields.
because the degrees only become available many years later.
I've met lots of hams. including a lot that I don't really like very much..
but I can honestly say I've never met a ham that was "boring" or "average"
Amateur radio doesn't really appeal to "average" people. and that's just
fine with me. special people need a "special" place to congregate also.
Any place where you find exciting, "high technology", you will also find
hams. and usually they are the ones pulling the levers... or building the
levers that others can pull.
+++++++
I don't have a very good opinion of the ARRL. they seem far too political to
me, and they cling to this outdated illusion that they define the "leading
edge" of radio technology.
That hasn't been true for decades. the average ham now thinks they are smart
if they know what all the buttons on their radios do.
Hams no longer "lead" the technology. the technology leads them. more and
more, we're all just a bunch of customers.. In the worst sense of that term.
++++++
I have recently found an organization that gives me great reason to be
hopeful. a non profit group with an internet foundation. and history.
https://www.ampr.org/
A few years ago they sold off some ( internet ) property and set up a trust
fund with the profits.
The fund was created to award grants to anyone promoting amateur radio. in
almost any way.
https://www.ampr.org/apply/grantmaking-categories-goals-2022/https://www.ampr.org/apply/grants/
The grants are very handsome, and listed on their website. about $2 million
a year.
A lot of the people getting grants seem to be doing things that really do
actively promote amateur radio. in the best spirit of that institution.
These guys are doing what I believe the ARRL should be doing.
( I should mention I've been published 5 times in QEX magazine.. an ARRL
publication. so I do try to help them also )
+++++
Enough for now, thanks for the YT video. I did watch it all, check out the
grants I mentioned, it will give you a reason to cheer up and be hopeful..
Thanks also the time and attention it took to read this rant.
Regards / Bob S.
Tom
Here's the stuff I use... not cheap but this is a 90 day supply... longer,
if you stretch it out
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B087775RX7/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o02
_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1>
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B087775RX7/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o02_
s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Sorry about the launch, I heard it was rescheduled for Friday but I guess it
changed again.
They happen pretty regularly now, everybody is jumping in the game...
+++++
Got a message from my African customer, he's gonna make a second payment...
I think this time he will send it direct from Nigeria, he needed extra bank
info from me.
I didn't ask how much he will send, but maybe another $ 1000... a nice
surprise for the holidays.
+++++
Ask Bruce what he uses for yogurt starter cultures... I still want to know.
( plus any other tips he might have )
Bob S.
Hello 44Net,
For those of you who are interested in our 2021 audited financials, they
are now posted and available for your perusal:
https://www.ampr.org/about/legal.
More information and context for the financials can be found in this
blog post:
https://www.ampr.org/2021-audited-990-pf-tax-return-financial-statements/
Happy perusing, and please don't hesitate to reach out with any questions.
Many thanks,
Rosy
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
All,
This is the updated dynamic firewall script for OpenWrt 22.03 >= 22.03. This script will not reload firewall counters upon processing new endpoints into the set.
Please be advised - a firewall bug on the release version will not recognize empty or missing files - and hence keeps this from working without an upgrade of the firewall. The script posted in the original email (attached below), contains the script that will work without the patch.
You may run the following to patch OpenWrt and use this:
opkg update; opkg upgrade firewall4reboot
Reference: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/re-22-03-translate-extra-raw-firewall-rules/140…
--
73,
-LynwoodKB3VWG--
#########################!/bin/sh# load encap.txt into ipipfilter list
PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin"
cd /tmp || exit 1
###########################
rm /tmp/ipip_filter.txt echo 169.228.34.84 >> /tmp/ipip_filter.txt
grep addprivate /var/lib/ampr-ripd/encap.txt | sed -e 's/.*encap //' | sort -u | while read ipdo echo $ip >> /tmp/ipip_filter.txtdone
fw4 reload-sets
exit 0
######################3
-------- Original message --------From: lleachii(a)aol.com Date: 10/4/22 19:15 (GMT-05:00) To: AMPRNet Working Group <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Subject: Re: [44net] Re: [FYI] OpenWrt Nodes - 22.03.0 with dynamic firewall
Old comments removed:
#!/bin/sh# load encap.txt into ipipfilter list
PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin"
cd /var/lib/ampr-ripd || exit 1
nft flush set inet fw4 ipipfilter
nft add element inet fw4 ipipfilter { 169.228.34.84 }
grep addprivate encap.txt | sed -e 's/.*encap //' | sort -u | while read ipdo nft add element inet fw4 ipipfilter { $ip }done
All,
I'm not sure to whom to direct this question. I'm trying to research who informed me (likely the late Brian Kantor WB6CYT, SK) - that an NTP server exists at 44.0.0.1 (gw.ampr.org).
Just doing some usual testing and updating of my node, I observed that there's no longer a NTP response from that IP. Is this by design, another issue, etc?
I just wanted to ask, especially since AMPRGW is listed on the Wiki as an available NTP server. I wanted to update that information if the service no longer operates on that IP.
--
73,
- LynwoodKB3VWG
Hi, all:
We are now accepting applications from those wishing to serve on our Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) in 2023. These are volunteer positions, with a term of one year (January to December). Please submit applications by Nov. 12, 2022!
About the TAC
The primary role of the TAC is to advise on 44Net technology, architecture, and policy. In 2022, the committee worked on providing feedback on a survey released to 44Net users, which garnered over 1700 responses from all over the world. Additionally, they developed a feature requirements document <https://www.ampr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022-09-Portal-Features-Requirement…> for an updated portal, which we use for 44Net address space allocations.
2023 Goals & Time Commitment
In 2023, the TAC will continue its work on refining 44Net use-cases and standards. Goals include further development of the portal mentioned above, researching and developing a proposal for Points for Presence (PoPs) based on existing use cases and best practices, and conversations with the 44Net community about IPv6. Note that though there may be some prototyping and development, the majority of the work may be document-focused.
The TAC usually meets once or twice a month for at least an hour. Additional time may be spent working on or taking meetings related to the projects mentioned above.
How to Apply
If you are interested in joining the TAC, please send a resume and brief cover letter to contact(a)ardc.net <mailto:contact@ardc.net> by November 12, 2022. In your cover letter, which can be brief, please outline:
Your experience with 44Net, networking, development, and/or amateur radio,
Your experience working with networking and similar technologies, and
What you could see yourself contributing in 2023.
Please submit applications by Nov. 12, 2022!
We’ll review all applications and seek to make a determination by December 7, 2022. Meetings will begin mid-January.
For more information about the roles and duties of these committees, you can read the Advisory Committee Policy in full here. <https://www.ampr.org/advisory-committee-policy/>
Please direct any questions to contact(a)ardc.net <mailto:contact@ardc.net>.
We’re looking forward to reading your application!
73,
Dan KB6NU
I'm trying to use the instructions at https://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Setting_up_a_gateway_on_Ubiquiti_EdgeRouter and I thought everything was working but I'm having and issues.
eth0 is my internet at 50.93.51.24
eth1 is my 192.168.1.x network
eth2 is my 44.135.148.129
switch0 is 192.168.1.1/24
tun44 was setup using the instructions (used 44 instead of 0)
I added the protocols (changed next-hop to tun44)
Added all the firewall modifications (keeping table 1)
I have setup in the portal my gateway at 50.93.51.24 (Did this yesterday).
My linux box has two network cards. One on 192.168.1.110 and the other is set to 44.135.148.130/27.
My problem is I can't ping from the outside world to my linux box on the 44 network. On my linux box when I try and ping any 44 network (like 44.60.44.10) none of the packets make it through. I tried pinging 44.60.44.10 from the Edgerouter command line and it won't make it either. I'm sure I missed something but I don't know what it might be. Any help would be appreciated.
Stephen Atkins
VE6CPU/VE6STA/VE6SU
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
Hi 44Net,
At long last, I'm pleased to share with you that ARDC has hired a new
Director of Technology, Jon Kemper.
In his role, Jon will be working with the foundation, volunteers and
community members to lead the assessment, development, and
implementation of new technology initiatives, manage open source
projects, and improve the operational efficiency of both 44Net and the
grantmaking side of the house.
Jon brings a wealth of experience managing global engineering teams
using software development methodologies. Notable projects include:
remotely-operated vehicles (including underwater vehicles), Internet of
things (IoT) sensors, and embedded control systems. His amateur radio
activities include the building of 70 cm repeaters that link together
via RF and VoIP and design of a flat audio board used to equalize and
route discriminator audio.
Jon holds an Amateur Extra Class amateur radio license and a commercial
General Radiotelephone Operator License (GROL). He studied computer
science and physics at California State University San Marcos and has an
AA Degree from Palomar College. Jon is a lifelong learner in the field
of technology and has been awarded 4 U.S. patents, including one for an
automotive security device and one for a device that measures
temperature and converts that measurement into a color.
Jon was introduced to radio and electronics by his grandfather, Guy A.
Kemper, who founded Kemper Radio Laboratories in Los Angeles. At ARDC,
Jon will be carrying on the family tradition of helping future
generations become interested in science and technology.
We are thrilled to have Jon on board and look forward to evolving and
improving our technology under his direction.
If you want to share the news with your friends off 44Net, the above is
also available in blog post form here:
https://www.ampr.org/ardc-welcomes-technical-director-jon-kemper-ka6nvy/
Also, Jon is cc'd here. Feel free to say hi to him on or off list.
Onwards and 73,
Rosy
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
I'm trying to follow the instructions on https://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Installing_ampr-ripd_on_a_Ubiquiti_EdgeRouter_or… but I'm not getting it and I've reset back to the default settings. I've got the router setup and working as a gateway with external IP of 75.158.135.117 which was given by DHCP from my ISP and is on eth0. On eth1 is set as my internal network as 192.168.1.1/24. I have two ethernet adapters on my computer. One is going to eth1 on the router. The other is on eth2 on the router which is currently not configured. I was thinking eth2 would be my 44 net. I have setup a DMZ so everything that comes in to eth0 goes to my computer (I have a lot of servers running on that machine so if you scan it you will get lots of hits. Have fun until I lock it down).
I'm hitting a snag on the very first part of router prep. Where it says to edit the WAN_LOCAL rule set. Under which do I add these? Under source NAT rule or destination NAT rule?
BTW I'm running ER3 Lite 1.10.11 on my router. Once I figure out a few of these things I can take some snap shots of my setup to add to the wiki page to help future setups.
Stephen Atkins
VE6CPU/VE6STA/VE6SU
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
David,
- I opted for the WAX202 after seeing this discussion: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/wax202-30-at-us-staples/138622/31 - regarding the other models, I don't see any other WAX models supported in the OpenWrt Table of hardware - https://openwrt.org/toh/start
- To my understanding, the Netgear firmware only produces an Access Point, as I need a router, C++ libraries to run ampr-ripd, snmp, NetFlow, firewall, etc., I've switched to OpenWrt already. I rarely run OEM firmware.
- While MAC filtering is not suggested as a security feature, yes - OpenWrt does support it. I'm not aware of any limits. See the macfilter WiFi config here: https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/wifi/basic#common_options1
I am considering WiFi 6E; but I currently have no devices possessing a 6 GHz chip. This will definitely be a consideration for my next device purchase
Also, I found another sale at Office Depot: https://www.officedepot.com/a/products/3002477/Netgear-Desktop-Wireless-Acc…
--
- KB3VWG
I'm finally getting my 44net router going. I've got an ipip tunnel going. I havent done any ping tests through it yet as I need to run another network cable. But I'm trying to figure out how to get the routing table loaded. I must be blind or to tired to find the instructions. Can someone point me in the right direction? After that I just need to get an ampr domain set.
Thanks
Stephen Atkins
VE6CPU/VE6STA/VE6SU
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
Alrighty everyone.
So I know my gateway is happy being part of the AmprNet, ( My tunl0 interface is working) because I get the correct IP address of my 1 and only host (for now) on my local AmprNet network when using Rob’s http://44.60.44.10/whatismyip/
Woo Hoo. The biggest part of this is done.
But my only problem now is…
I can resolve, ping, and get ping responses using hostnames such as Bob’s linux.ve3mch.ampr.org and every other hostname’s he has, on my Gateway machines terminal but NOT from the 1 and only host(for now). BUT!! I can
ping their IP addresses.
I know this is a DNS issue but what DNS entry should I be using on my AmprNet host to resolve domain names to their IP addresses on the AmprNet? Should I be running my own? Not really sure where to attack this issue.
After this, I believe I’ll be ready to pitch my services to the MESH network guys here in the Valley to see what interest I can spun up in joining at least a couple of nodes for now onto the AmprNet itself. Also ill work on returning my
packet node to service after a few years and have it available on the AmprNet.
Thanks all. I have faith in this. LOL
Harold
K7ILO
From: Lee D Bengston <kilo5dat(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, October 13, 2022 at 11:15 AM
To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [44net] Testing 1 2 3 4
Update - it turned out the problem with my access to the portal was just a web browser issue. I changed web browsers and was able to log in.
Here is what is in the portal for my gateway. Both subnets are listed, but indeed only the first one is in the encap.txt file.
[cid:ii_l97dnxsc0]
Evidently the subnet that is not in encap.txt is being advertised via RIP44 because various people are able to communicate with my IP's in 44.92.0.64/28<http://44.92.0.64/28>.
73,
Lee K5DAT
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 9:18 PM Lee D Bengston <kilo5dat(a)gmail.com<mailto:kilo5dat@gmail.com>> wrote:
Harold,
Nothing has been down on my end. I think most people use ampr-ripd these days to get the routes, so not being in the encap.txt file would not affect them. I have 8 or 9 AXIP links between my packet node and others over amprnet, and all of them are up and have been for weeks. It does look like my password expired on the portal, so I need to address that. I would think if I didn't log in to the portal often enough, and they wanted to suspend my allocation, then the routes for my allocation would disappear from the ampr-ripd broadcast AND the encap.txt file. I seem to recall when I first started playing with amprnet that there were routes missing in encap.txt.
Thanks,
Lee K5DAT
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 8:45 PM Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>> wrote:
Hey Lee
I was going to try to ping you again and see that your route (subnet) is not in the encap.txt file.
Im assuming when this happens, your system is down?
Thanks
Harold
K7IO
From: Lee D Bengston <kilo5dat(a)gmail.com<mailto:kilo5dat@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 6:40 AM
To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>>
Subject: Re: [44net] Testing 1 2 3 4
Hello Harold,
Sorry I was insanely busy yesterday at work. Today I am not able to ping any of the 3, but maybe you have made some changes. I did try pinging some other amprnet addresses and still could.
73,
Lee
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 2:54 PM Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>> wrote:
Ok Lee
Try now.
I added a route to my startup script to see what happnens.
Let me know.
Thanks.
Harold
From: Lee D Bengston <kilo5dat(a)gmail.com<mailto:kilo5dat@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 9:39 AM
To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>>
Subject: Re: [44net] Testing 1 2 3 4
Fyi I can ping .193 and .194 but not .195
Lee K5DAT
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:39 AM Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>> wrote:
I figured that’s what you meant. LOL
Do me a favor and see if you get a ping response from 44.63.63.193, 194 and 195
Thanks
Harold
From: Lee D Bengston <kilo5dat(a)gmail.com<mailto:kilo5dat@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 3:18 PM
To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>>
Subject: Re: [44net] Testing 1 2 3 4
OK, meant to say trace to .66 should go thru .65, but I think you got the gist. Glad to hear things are working.
73,
Lee K5DAT
On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 3:28 PM Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>> wrote:
Lee
Ping and traceroute as expected.
Thanks
Harold
K7ILO
From: Lee D Bengston <kilo5dat(a)gmail.com<mailto:kilo5dat@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 6:52 AM
To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com<mailto:k7ilo@outlook.com>>
Subject: Re: [44net] Testing 1 2 3 4
Hello Harold,
Feel free to try 44.92.0.65 & 44.92.9.66. Also if you traceroute to .65 it should go through .65.
73,
Lee K5DAT
On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 9:24 PM Harold Kinchelow via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org<mailto:44net@mailman.ampr.org>> wrote:
Hey gang.
Are there a couple of ip’s I can use the do a ping test from my network?
Trying to test to make sure Im heading in the right direction.
Thanks
Harold
K7ILo
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org<mailto:44net@mailman.ampr.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org<mailto:44net-leave@mailman.ampr.org>
Apologies to 44NET, the previous message from me was a mistake... don't know
how the 44NET address got added to it, but it was never intended for
44NET... sorry...
Jay...
This is from Bob Simmons, ( WB6EYV ) I used to live in SB. ( now in Santa
Maria, retired )
You might recall me, I've been an Impulse customer for decades.
I have a problem, maybe you can help. or know who can help... or maybe not.
I know you are a busy fellow, you may want to hand this off to someone
else... I will understand.
Not sure if I am asking for something difficult, or even impossible... but
here goes.
+++++++++++++
I was told recently my ( personal ) IMPULSE website service will be
discontinued end of October, and I must relocate my website elsewhere.
My email was already relocated ( by your people ) to HIIWAY in Alabama, so
I decided they would also be the new host for my website.
++++++++++++
The problem is this : I want to preserve all the old legacy bookmarks ( if
possible ) that pointed to my website at the original SILICON BEACH address
:
www.silcom.com/~pelican2
There must be thousands of those bookmarks out there, my website hasn't
moved in over 20 years.
I created it in a personal website space ( not a business space ) because
originally I just wanted to learn how to make websites, and that space was
"free" with my internet service.
I used it to learn how to make ( simple ) websites, and also to show off my
technical skills by describing a Doppler DF I had created.
It morphed eventually into a business site, ( with modest success ) but that
was not my original intention, and I never bothered to move it.
I don't make much $ from it these days but lots of people still find me with
it, and I sometimes get work opportunities from it.
++++++++++++++
If I move my website to the HIIWAY servers, all those bookmarks will "go
dead", and 20 years of internet "profile" will be lost.
I spoke with HIIWAY people, they don't own the SILCOM.COM domain so there
isn't much they can do.
I was hoping you folks might be able to create a REDIRECT from the original
website address in your domain to the new HIIWAY address.
I don't know the HIIWAY address yet. I haven't moved the website yet. I
wanted first to discover if this request is even possible.
I suspect it is highly unorthodox, you might decline to even attempt it.
If that is true, I'll try to figure something else out, or just "bite the
bullet" and kiss the legacy bookmarks "good bye".
Either way, the sooner I can discover if it is possible / practical, the
sooner I can get back to the work of moving the website.
++++++++++++++
I hope you get this and respond in a timely manner, I only have maybe 2
weeks left.
That should be plenty of time to move it, but I've never moved a website
before, I expect unknown problems in the transition. so I might need the
spare time for troubleshooting.
Anyway, thanks again for all your help over the years. it was priceless.
Hope things are well there.
( Email is probably best way to respond, I usually ignore cell calls from
unknown numbers )
Regards
Bob Simmons / WB6EYV
1600 East Clark Ave Space 68
Orcutt CA 93455
( 805 ) 598 3542 cell
I ran the speed test from work via our 10G ESNet connection, below is the results link. The latency is pretty high because of the distance, also our proxy most likely had an impact too.
73
http://speedtest.pi9noz.ampr.org/results/?id=1bqh3e3
Run the speedtest
From work
198.102.151.247 - Sandia National Laboratories, US (8260 km)
All,
I have migrated my node from an x86_64 machine to a Netgear WAX202. It now runs on solar/battery for indefinite power. The device is OpenWrt-compatible and available for US$29.99 from Staples. On a 1 Gbps connection, I am receiving about 910 Mbps; so for the electricity savings, I'm happy with its performance.
If you have a 1 Gbps connection or less to your ISP, this may work for you as a good home/AMPR router.
https://www.staples.com/netgear-essentials-wax202b-ax1800-access-point/prod…https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/netgear/netgear_wax202
--
73,
- LynwoodKB3VWG
Thanks.I understood tests were from AMPR. My apologies if you were seeking publicly-reachable IPs.Only 44.60.44.10 is avaliable from the Public Internet. Yes, you will see the landing folder as the home page (this by design and is to keep bandwidth low). Simply browse to the /homepage folder if you wish.Recall if you test from your AMPR gateway's public IP - I allow you to reach some AMPRNet hosts as well - you should not use this as an indicator of general Public Internet access.- KB3VWG
-------- Original message --------From: Steve L via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: 10/10/22 12:21 (GMT-05:00) To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com> Cc: lleachii(a)aol.com, Harold Kinchelow via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Subject: [44net] Re: Testing 1 2 3 4 Actually his 44.60.44.1 is reachable from the internet. So if youcannot reach the others you likely have a routing rule problem.I usually test against hambook.de.ampr.orgOn Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 3:29 PM Harold Kinchelow via 44net<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:>> Lynwood>>>> I got a response from .1 only at this time>> but that means im connected.>>>> Thanks>>>> Harold>> K7ILO>>>> From: lleachii--- via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>> Date: Sunday, October 9, 2022 at 7:52 AM> To: Harold Kinchelow via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>> Subject: [44net] Re: Testing 1 2 3 4>> Harold:>>>>>> You can ping/test:>>>>>> 44.60.44.1 - NTP>>>> 44.60.44.3 - DNS>>>> 44.60.44.10 - HTTP>>>>>> -->>>> 73,>>>>>> - Lynwood>> KB3VWG>>>> _______________________________________________> 44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org_______________________________________________44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
Hey gang.
Are there a couple of ip’s I can use the do a ping test from my network?
Trying to test to make sure Im heading in the right direction.
Thanks
Harold
K7ILo
All
So today, I decided to ping k7ilo.ampr.org which it seems to point to an OLD public IP I had at that time.
I remember some time ago I had set up k7ilo.ampr.org for some reason but have forgotten how this is done.
If I use that, I would like it to point to the right ip address.
Where is this done now? I believe when I did create this, it was via the email ROBOT that existed then.
Thanks all
Harold
K7ILO
Hey gang. Kinda new here for Ive been dabbling with this for a few years though. I have been trying to use the ampr-ripd daemon without any luck and have come to the conclusion that my ISP blocks port 520 which I believe is the port used.
With that said, i have also come to the conclusion that at this time, the encap.txt file is still accessible via ftp from the portal.ampr.org.
Is "wget ftp://USER:PASSWORD@portal.ampr.org/encap.txt" a valid ftp solution and if so where is the USER:PASSWORD derived from?
Is it our user:password into the portal?
Thanks all
Harold K7ILO
Bill,Your VoIP system should be configured to register with the server. This would maintain the link.I'm not sure what client/server you're using, but there may be a time, timeout or keepalive (etc.) setting in the configuration options for the Callcentric service.If you are configured to receive blind SIP calls/packets into your Public IP at udp/5060 or something, Carrier Grade NAT would hinder that method.--- KB3VWG
- I believe the secure firewall the ALG would need to traverse and be installed on is the ISP's device. That seems to be the source of the current issue.- The SIP ALG is known to be vulnerable - see https://samy.pl/slipstream/
Bill,Carrier grade NAT means you aren't issued a Public IP on the WAN interface facing your ISP. There's a block of IP space (100.64.0.0/10) used for this purpose. CG NAT exists because of exhaustion of the Global IPv4 space.Yes, this would mean you cannot control receipt of protocols like: TCP, UDP and importantly for AMPR - IP Protocol No. 4.It sounds like they may have recently implemented this on their customer network. The ISP can offer their own services because they use their Public IP space on those needed servers. Another example where they use Global IPs - is on the CG NAT router that connects you to the Internet.It's possible they now offer a Public IP as an added service. You could inquire about that.73,LynwoodKB3VWG
-------- Original message --------From: Harold Kinchelow via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Date: 10/4/22 22:32 (GMT-05:00) To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org Subject: [44net] New ISP blocking VoIP
I am reposting this for William Horne because he post using a prevous message of mine but it came directly to me. Please take a look
@ his issue below.
Thanks
Harold
K7ILO
From: E. William Horne <malassimilation(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 2, 2022 2:57 PM
To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com>
Subject: New ISP blocking VoIP
OM,
I humbly request that you help me in any way you can to get around my new ISP blocking VoIP phone calls. On 9/4/2022, they stopped without warning or justification: both Callcentric and Hamshack Hotline went dead at the same time.
On Monday, 9/5, I complained to the "Tech Support" number, and I listened to their employee being told to "Blame it on his router," and then to her doing so. I told her that wouldn't cut it, and she said she would "reset my modem" and then
Callcentric came back online. I made a call with my Cisco SIP phone, and talked to my brother-in-law in Massachusetts for a few minutes, but right after we hanged up, the Callcentric line was dead again. I complained again, with nothing but gobbledygook and
shaming and finger-pointing to show for it.
The ISP had some flack call me, and he told me that they were doing "Cee-Gee-NAT," and couldn't map the ports required for Voip. I asked him how the ISP could offer it's own VoIP service, right on their public-facing website, if that were
so. He said he'd have to do some more research, and I've never heard back.
Here's a fervent "TIA" for any help you can offer.
73,
Bill Horne, W4EWH
828-380-1440 (Cell)
I am reposting this for William Horne because he post using a prevous message of mine but it came directly to me. Please take a look
@ his issue below.
Thanks
Harold
K7ILO
________________________________
From: E. William Horne <malassimilation(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 2, 2022 2:57 PM
To: Harold Kinchelow <k7ilo(a)outlook.com>
Subject: New ISP blocking VoIP
OM,
I humbly request that you help me in any way you can to get around my new ISP blocking VoIP phone calls. On 9/4/2022, they stopped without warning or justification: both Callcentric and Hamshack Hotline went dead at the same time.
On Monday, 9/5, I complained to the "Tech Support" number, and I listened to their employee being told to "Blame it on his router," and then to her doing so. I told her that wouldn't cut it, and she said she would "reset my modem" and then Callcentric came back online. I made a call with my Cisco SIP phone, and talked to my brother-in-law in Massachusetts for a few minutes, but right after we hanged up, the Callcentric line was dead again. I complained again, with nothing but gobbledygook and shaming and finger-pointing to show for it.
The ISP had some flack call me, and he told me that they were doing "Cee-Gee-NAT," and couldn't map the ports required for Voip. I asked him how the ISP could offer it's own VoIP service, right on their public-facing website, if that were so. He said he'd have to do some more research, and I've never heard back.
Here's a fervent "TIA" for any help you can offer.
73,
Bill Horne, W4EWH
828-380-1440 (Cell)
Hey Amateur Radio team
I know what VPN is. I know what OpenVPN does. What are the actual uses of having a VPN into the AmprNet space.
Ive seen on so many diagrams of setups where there is a VPN into the network.
Thanks all
Harold - K7ILO
All,
FYI if you upgrade an OpenWrt node to 22.03.0 with a dynamic firewall script. The script will need to be updates to nftables.
In addition, I am running on x86_64, but those who use consumer hardware may experience loads when iptables rules were in the Wiki versus "ipset" (which is an iptables feature). See the archives about that issue.
On larger sets of IPs, the load times are slower. I'm not sure if that's due to our routing table already being in a "least-specific" notation. Nonetheless, if anyone wishes to try, feel free to have me as a resource during your upgrade. If anyone want to test installing the additional needed packages to continue using, let me know too for documenting to the Wiki. I can test on consumer software too - and you can forward the routes to it using the setting in ampr-ripd.
--
73,
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
Stations are issued an 44-net IP on their first connection, which remains permanently for all subsequent connections. It also automatically reconnects should the underlying IP change, or drop out (think cellular based links).
IRLP can handle IPs changing on the fly automatically, but our VPN users are essentially static using the same 44-net address each time they connect.
—
Dave K9DC, K9IP
> On Oct 4, 2022, at 17:56, Stephen Atkins <ve6cpu(a)proton.me> wrote:
>
> Are you using 44net so you have a "static" ip for those repeaters instead of always having to update dns for there dynamic is ones?
>
>
> Stephen Atkins
> VE6CPU/VE6STA/VE6SU
All,
Overnight, I upgraded my AMPR Gateway to OpenWrt 22.03.0. There is a major firewall change from iptables to nftables.
Feel free to test access (NOTE: only the protocols listed work).
You should be able to Trace/Ping from your Public or AMPR ranges:
- 44.60.44.1 NTP (NTP should only be configured on AMPR clients, but it is open to your public IPs by firewall as a courtesy)
- 44.60.44.3 DNS (dns-mdc.ampr.org - only from AMPR)
- 44.60.44.10 HTTP (http://44.60.44.10 and http://kb3vwg-010.ampr.org/homepage/ on AMPR and Public - AMPR access has more options/links available)
--
73,
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
Hello 44Net!
For quite some time, y'all have heard rumblings of a new portal, which
Chris has been working on bit by bit. Realizing that it's likely a
larger project than we initially thought, earlier this year the TAC took
on the task of writing a feature requirements document. This has been
the bulk of their work this year so far, and I'm really proud of the
results, which were completed just a couple weeks ago.
I'm writing on behalf of the TAC to share this document with you and to
request comments and comments:
https://www.ampr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022-09-Portal-Features-Requirement…
Ideally, please share your thoughts in this channel rather than emailing
directly, though of course we will read any feedback you send. Pierre,
the TAC Chair, will be watching the list and answering any questions
that may come up.
Note that this document is a feature requirements document - which
outlines the features that the portal needs to have before it's
considered "done." By definition, it's *not* an engineering document;
we've purposefully not specified the exact technology we'll use to build
this out. We have, however, specified that it will be released as an
open source project as soon as we have a functional version, likely
without all features present. Ultimately this will be a project managed
by our new Director of Technology (who starts on Monday; will introduce
after he starts) and the team he assembles to carry out the build. Thus,
information like timelines, project plans, and database specifications,
etc., will follow his review of this document and any comments from this
group.
And with that, I say - happy reading! And thank you so much for your
thoughts and questions.
Looking forward,
Rosy
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
Hello
I started to have that problem to receive no response from 169.228.34.84
using
ampr-ripd program. I had en old net modem changed by my provider
for HGB10R-021 modem to have more internet speed and really
there is not possible to configure protocol-4, only TCP USB or BOTH.
So I am already more weeks without axip links.
I have no idea how to resolve this problem.
73 Libor, sysop of OK2PEN-5 amprnet gate IP 44.63.16.113.
Hi all,
I recently found some time to translate our report from the HAM RADIO
2022 hamfest in Friedrichshafen. I thought it might be of interest what
we are doing with the 44Net resources.
Please jump to the "HAMNET" chapter and read on to get an idea of our usage:
https://www.darc.de/fileadmin/filemounts/referate/vus/tagungen/2022/HAMNET_…
73,
Jann
DG8NGN
Member of the IP-Coordination Germany
--
Jann Traschewski, Faber-Castell-Str. 9, D-90522 Oberasbach, Germany
Tel.: +49-911-99946898, Mobile: +49-170-1045937, E-Mail: jann(a)gmx.de
Ham: DG8NGN / DB0VOX / DB0FOX / DB0ZM / DB0DBA / DB0HZS / DB0RUS
Is anybody else having a hard time getting updated LOA documents?
Chris kindly asked me to fill a text form and email back to chris [at]
ardc.net.
For a couple weeks, I had trouble with delivering mail to ardc.net after my
MTA (Gmail) apparently got marked as a spammer. This seems to have since
been resolved, and it seems like my emails are getting delivered.
However, I haven't heard back from Chris for a couple months, and I'm
wondering if everything is working ok for others, or if somehow I've done
something wrong.
Hoping all is well with the ARDC crew and Chris, but I'm left a bit stuck
and temporarily offline until I can get an updated LOA. Help?
Cheers,
jof
All,
I sent this warning - it never made it to the mailing list.
--
KB3VWG
-----Original Message-----
From: lleachii(a)aol.com
To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Sent: Mon, Jun 27, 2022 10:00 am
Subject: SK N1URO's mail server/domain
All,
I received SPAM email from the domain GMX DOT net. As some of you may know, this was one of the email domains the late N1URO used. Perhaps it is coincidence; but it seems that maybe (at minimum) his contact list may have been compromised.
Be aware.
73,
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
All,
Can someone send me a web URL link to the 44-net mailing list off-list please?
The current body no longer includes a link. I have not received emails for months, so I'd like to read up - also, I need to get a password/activate digest.
73,
- Lynwood
KB3VWG
All,
After re-subscribing was complete (which doesn't inform you've been approved), things are well and I'm receiving emails again. I just need to re-activate digest. I'm not sure why I was unsubscribed. I appreciate those who gave me a signal report.
--
KB3VWG
Hello 44Net,
As part of our 44Net assessment project, we're putting together a couple
of focus groups. These discussions are really helpful for going deeper
into some of the ideas presented in the survey. After all, no
questionnaire can ever replace real dialogue.
A few weeks ago, we had a focus group dedicated to regional
coordinators. Thank you Marius Petrescu YO2LOG, David Ranch KI6ZHD, and
Gabriel Medinas YV5KXE for showing up! Despite the small turnout, we had
some important discussion – about the need for greater transparency
around decisions related to the address space, the need for making 44Net
easier to use, and the ways that regional coordinators want to help and
be a part of the discussion. The idea of PoPs came up as well, as well
as thoughts about the portal and much more.
In service of transparency and open dialogue, I encourage you,
particularly if you are a Regional Coordinator, to review the notes from
the meeting:
https://www.ampr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022-08-regional-coordinators-focus…
Questions for all, but regional coordinators in particular: what do you
think about the challenges / solutions presented? Is there something
you'd like to see addressed or added that's not listed? Please share
your thoughts on the list.
If you'd like to be a part of the next focus group, happening on Sept.
23 and for more general 44net users, please get in touch with Merideth,
cc'd. She can add you to the participant list.
Some of you may also be wondering what's going on with the data and
information from the survey. We're in the process of cleaning up the
data (e.g. removing personally identifiable information, codifying text
based responses). We'll let you know when we plan to have a report
ready; we're solidifying those details now. Thanks for your patience.
I will be out of the office for a few days, but John Hays K7VE – ARDC
staff and a regional coordinator for Western Washington – is on hand to
answer questions that may come up. I look forward to jumping back in
when I return next week.
Many thanks and all the best,
Rosy
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
Hi Chris, contacting you via the list. Can you please do something
about your system's hard reliance on SORBS data to block mail. I am
unable to contact you privately, because this is blocking Gmail's servers.
--
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
Dear 44Net mailing list members,
Weaving through many of the messages from the past few weeks, I’m aware
that folks have some questions around why G1FEF has been organizing BGP
requests in 44.31/16. Behind these questions, in some cases, is a sense
of uncertainty around whether or not ARDC is going to sell any more
address space. Some members of the TAC have requested that I speak to
you all about these issues, and to create space where you can ask
questions. So here we go
G1FEF has been putting BGP allocations into 44.31/16 for a few reasons:
* Currently there are BGP “holes” randomly scattered throughout our
address space. This makes it harder to manage, especially when trying to
spot unauthorized announcements, which we get a lot of.
* We inherited the “give a /16 to every region or country” practice from
the 1990’s which has resulted in extremely sparse use of the space. We'd
be better “netizens” if we used the space more effectively.
* The HAMNET issue (needing a static set of addresses for BGP routing)
is also a consideration, as they are the largest consumers of our
address space by far.
All told, Chris is doing his best to engage in best practices absent a
more robust policy around BGP. Creating that policy is definitely on the
list, and ideally fits into a greater vision around next steps for the
address space (PoPs? Better organizing assignments for one reason or
another? etc.). Data from our recent assessment is helping us to put
together that vision. Thank you to all of you who shared your thoughts.
In terms of whether ARDC is planning to sell more addresses: while it
may happen at some point in the future, there are no current plans,
short or medium term, to do so. The non-inconsequential effort involved
in overcoming the tax and operational implications of such a move would
only make sense after taking into account the views of the 44Net
community on a vision for overall address space usage and associated
future plans.
In the meantime, many thanks for your patience amid the uncertainty.
Feel free to ask any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Rosy
--
Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV
Executive Director
Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC)
ampr.org
Hello,
Which distribution do you recommend for a PI
and only use for hamnet ?
I'm trying with a Debian and lxqt.
What do you think about this choice ?
73
F1sxo
Frédéric ZULIAN
Hello
I'm wondering who else I should contact (I contacted the local coordinator for 44.170.0.0/16 but he doesn't seem to want to resolve my request) to get an IP address or range.
Berry - 9a3bex
Hello ARDC Grant Applicant or Awardee,
As we all know, the only constant in life is change. Here at ARDC, we are
making a big one: switching to a new grant application software called
Hypha. It’s open source and has a ton of great features that will make the
application process easier for applicants, reviewers, and staff. You can
see the new system here:
https://grants.ardc.net
And read more about it here:
<https://www.ampr.org/new-grants-management-system-to-make-applying-for-and-…>
https://www.ampr.org/new-grants-management-system-to-make-applying-for-and-…
Here’s what this change means for you:
- *All applications submitted July 15, 2022, and earlier will remain on
the old system:* https://mailman.ampr.org/hotcrp. We won’t be getting
rid of this database anytime soon, so don’t worry about your information
getting lost.
- *All applications submitted July 16, 2022, and after will need to be
entered in the new system:* https://grants.ardc.net. This includes
in-progress applications. The questions are exactly the same, so it should
be easy enough to copy over.
If you plan on submitting any new applications, you’ll need to create a new
account on https://grants.ardc.net by clicking the Apply button.
If you have any questions about the new system, or are having trouble
applying for a grant, contact us by emailing help(a)ardc.net.
Thanks for everything that you do.
Sincerely,
The ARDC Grants Team
Hi all,
Here's what I received that morning from Vultr (my BGP provider), just
after a bunch of monitoring alarms :
> The prefix owner has requested we remove the following prefix from your account:
>
> 44.190.11.0/24
>
> If you have any questions regarding this request, please reach out to the prefix owner for more information, thanks!
Then, our whole island of Corsica is completely disconnected from the
rest of the world ! Without any advice. That becomes really annoying.
No more comments for today, because I do not have the right words in
English to tell my exact feeling. Maybe it's just time to say goodbye.
73 de TK1BI
Hello to the Group,
I have just upgraded my FIOS service in New Jersey and with it came a
new router - something called a CR1000A. It has a Verizon brand on it
but I suspect it is made under contract by someone else.
Has anyone on the group used this router and have been successful in
getting it to forward Protocol 4 packets? It does have a DMZ, but I'd
rather not use it if possible.
I think I have been able to define Protocol 4 into it but I am unable to
have it forward those packets to my ipip tunnel machine.
73, Mark, N2MH
n2mh.ampr.orghttp://n2mh-web.n2mh.ampr.org
Hi Rob,
I agree 100%. Having two networks that really don't talk to each other
but with a common address space is ridiculous.
Along the lines you mention, perhaps ARDC should consider a "grant", or
perhaps a better word, RFQ from various ISP's who could set up such a
thing and run it. This would eliminate all the bickering/discussion of
what is the best way/protocol to do something like this as well as
determining where to locate POP's around the world.
Vultr comes to mind simply because they are doing it for a number of
AMPR users already. Of course, other ISP's could do it, but Vultr is the
most often mentioned company.
I would think that the chosen ISP would set up one AMPR network with
connectivity to all 44 network addresses and give an option to any
subscriber to have his segment BGP announced or not.
73, Mark, N2MH
On 7/19/22 14:16, Rob PE1CHL via 44net wrote:
> I hope that, rather sooner than later, we can offer a new connectivity
> option for AMPRnet that does not require tricks in your router, does
> not depend on a static address, works with CGNAT, etc.
> The objective is to use a modern standard VPN instead of IPIP
> (wireguard, openvpn, l2tp/ipsec or whatever) to connect to a
> relatively local point of presence that will handle the further
> routing towards other users and the internet for you, with good
> latency and reliability.
> That will end the continuous battling with the IPIP mesh that
> unfortunately is the reality of today.
> Software would run on a standard router (not the router from your ISP,
> more like a MikroTik or UBNT or openwrt device), or e.g. a Raspberry Pi.
>
> We need to lower the bar for making connections. Like you, most
> people want to put applications online rather than fighting with
> protocols that are not easy to deploy anymore.
>
> Rob
>
> On 7/19/22 19:48, Mark Herson, N2MH via 44net wrote:
>> Thanks to everyone who replied.
>>
>> Nobody actually directly answered the question that I posed of having
>> actually used this router and/or having some experience with it.
>> Thus, I'll take that as a collective "no".