I realized it was a return route issue on my way to work yesterday.
It's all working now.
Thanks again
------------ Quote ------------
One thing to check would be if the VPN client has a route for 44/8 pointing
through the VPN ("ip route" on the client). The VPN server should give the
client the route using a directive in the server config:
push "route 44.0.0.0 255.0.0.0"
Ciao Hessu,
just to share our experience in using OpenVPN solution to access CisarNet (http://wifi.cisar.it for the map, http://www.cisarnet.it for other services, ...),
Before to setup the solution (about three years ago), inside our working group we discussed about using named certificates, Certification Authority, user registration process, crypto and so on...
At the end, we decided just to share one only common signed key, and also permit free guest access without user identification (just as equivalence to radio Push-To-Talk button), no crypto (for regulatory compliance in several country for radio ham radio communication, Italy included). Storing logs permit us to be compliant to law about taking care of timestamp, ip source of the VPN client peer and destination ip public address. Also, in this way we are extending in Italy the usage of amprnet, by managing directly the CIDR 44.208/16 subnet as Internet IP public Address.
I hope this help you to know our point of view, a little different from yours, but also useful for share several experiences (thanks to your well done guide on ampr wikis). We'd like also to know your (and others) opinion about Italian Cisar association approach to OpenVPN access.
Ciao from Italy.
IW0SAB Renzo.
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: hessu(a)hes.iki.fi
>Data: 08/05/2013 0.42
>A: "AMPRNet working group"<44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>Ogg: [44net] VPN access to AMPRNet using amateur X.509 certificates
>
>(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>_______________________________________________
>
>Hi,
>
>The AMPRNet might be more useful if it had:
>
>(1) more services which would be interesting to hams
>(2) more access to the AMPRNet
>
>Tonight I tried to attack (2) a bit. Access to the AMPRNet over the
>Internet could maybe be made easier to hams by allowing them to connect
>over VPNs instead of setting up their own IPIP tunnels at home, or trying
>to find a working radio gateway. After getting a VPN running it might be
>easier for them to set up a radio gateway, or some services. As discussed
>on the other mailing list, VPNs are easier to get up on NATed residential
>networks than IPIP tunnels.
>
>Setting up VPN user accounts and maintaining them can be a pain. It
>doesn't take a lot of weekly or monthly maintenance work to run a VPN
>service, but it can be a major pain to manage an user account database for
>thousands of hams and check if your users around the Internet are, in
>fact, licensed.
>
>It turns out that ARRL's Logbook of the World has already given out
>cryptographic X.509 certificates to 57334 amateur users, after verifying
>their license status against the FCC database (they send a postcard with a
>random token code to the FCC-listed snail-mail address to make sure they
>give the certificate to the right guy) or after looking at a paper
>photocopy of a license + a photo ID. I had to physically mail in a photo
>of my ham license and my driver's license and wait a couple weeks to get
>the cert. If they can get 50k contesters and DXers to work with
>certificates, maybe certs can work for the AMPRnet, too.
>
>Technically, we can validate if a VPN user is in possession of one of
>those certificates and the respective private key. Politically, K4JH asked
>the ARRL guys, and they said that they don't mind if we use them for other
>ham authentication needs. We can start accepting other CAs too once they
>come around. I plan to help SRAL, the Finnish amateur radio union, to set
>up a CA within their web site (they already have user accounts for
>members). I know ARRL isn't for everyone, but smaller clubs could set up
>CAs too, or even commercial entities - as long as we trust them to do the
>license validation in a proper manner.
>
>Tonight I hacked up an OpenVPN setup which authenticates users with LoTW
>certs, and wrote a little documentation:
>
>http://wiki.ampr.org/index.php/AMPRNet_VPN
>
>What do you think? Technically, it seems to work - try it out if you like.
>It's not very straightforward to set up, but the license validation is
>pretty strong, and running the service shouldn't be a lot of work. There
>can be many VPN servers around the world, serving the whole customer base
>(VPN servers do not need access to any central user database, they just
>need the certificates of the trusted CAs). With a little Dynamic DNS
>magic, you could get a oh7lzb.vpn.ampr.org hostname on DNS within a few
>seconds after connecting (I've got code for that in another project).
>
>(Yes, eventually certificates need to be revoked after they accidentally
>get into wrong hands, or ham licenses are revoked. Technically that can be
>done using CRLs and/or OCSP, but ARRL apparently does not do those yet.
>Maybe they will, if the need arises. We can also set up a blocked
>certificates list of our own.)
>
> - Hessu, OH7LZB
>
>_________________________________________
>44Net mailing list
>44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>http://www.ampr.org/donate.html
>
Thanks for refreshing my memory. I am really rusty at this, since
they have made home networking plug and play.
I have IP forwarding enabled.
root@ampr-test:~# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Could you give an example of what I need for iptables forwarding rules.?
Steve
I have been playing with openvpn. Works great to establish a
connection to a remote firewalled host.
Problem:
I have a rip IPIP gateway. I have subnets 44.92.20.0/24 and
44.92.21.0/24 set in the portal
44.92.20.1 is my ampr gateway address. That is working, pingable.
tunl0 Link encap:IPIP Tunnel HWaddr
inet addr:44.92.21.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1480 Metric:1
RX packets:138952 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:89710 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:37916347 (36.1 MiB) TX bytes:15979452 (15.2 MiB)
I have a openvpn server also running on this box. It's address is
44.92.20.1. The client connecting is: 44.92.20.6
The server can ping the client, the client can ping the server.
tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
inet addr:44.92.20.1 P-t-P:44.92.20.2 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:12 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:1184 (1.1 KiB) TX bytes:756 (756.0 B)
I don't understand why 44.92.20.6 is not reachable from the outside world?
(If nothing else, you'd think some simple route add command would make is so)
And yes I have these routes for the IPIP gateway:
/sbin/ip route add default via 169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 proto static
onlink table 10
/sbin/ip rule add from 44.92.21.0/24 table 10
/sbin/ip rule add from 44.92.20.0/24 table 10
Can anyone see anything I am overlooking?
First, Hessu your VPN idea looks interesting. Hopefully I'll have
some time in the coming weeks to give it a try. Thanks for your
efforts.
Regarding cleaning up the DNS. Someone mentioned the idea of sorting
hosts that are theoretically reachable via a tunnel. Then possibly
purging ones that are not, or at least further review of these.
So we gave it a shot, seemed simple enough. Look at the encap.txt
file, look for hosts in each CIDR... (checking this file:
ftp://hamradio.ucsd.edu/pub/amprhosts.)
A quick google search yielded this nifty function that is the magic to
the whole thing
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/594112/matching-an-ip-to-a-cidr-mask-in-…http://pastebin.com/CCiX4Upd
It's not quite working, maybe someone who knows more can fix it?
I get some errors about Undefined offsets.
Steve, KB9MWR
from the wiki at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMPRNet:
*44.128.0.0/16*
*44.128.x.x is the testing subnet and consists of 65,536 (216) addresses.
Much akin to 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 169.254.0.0/16 or 192.168.0.0/16,
this is an unroutable private IP
block<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network>.
Connectivity to the rest of the network should be given through router
gateways <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gateway_(telecommunications)> much
as one would do with Network address
translation<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation>
in
any other private IP block.*
There is no attribution to that statement, and nothing I could find at
AMPR.org
Is this the best way to address devices when doing NAT into a private
network? Any issues?
Or are there advantages to requesting assigned numbers?
thanks & 73,
Jim Alles
I just made some requests via the AMPRNet portal to create some DNS records in the ampr.org domain, and the requests were rejected with the following remark:
"DNS is not active yet, please subscribe to the 44-Net mailing list to keep advised of progress."
I presume they are referring to this mail list.
So, how do I get DNS records created in the ampr.org domain? I understand that in the past, there was an email robot, but I have been unable to find any details on how to use it. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Many thanks,
Matt VK2RQ
What are your thoughts about where do we go with IPv6?
We (PSARC) are about to request a backbone connection with IPv6 addressing.
What if I wanted to map an assigned 44net address to a IPv6 address?
Or, is tunneling the answer?
It looks like the possibilities are endless
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_transition_mechanisms
Jim A.
Brian K.:
*"This is precisely the situation that our longstanding method of tunnel
gateways is designed to overcome.
You do this by setting up a Linux host that is assigned a single PSU
address, probably something that isn't too hard to do. You shouldn't need
to have them open any holes in the firewall or ask for special treatment
as long as the existing firewall allows IPIP (internet protocol #4)
through, which most do because the firewall managers never thought to
block it, and also because some VPN schemes used to use it.
The PSU folks don't have to do anything about network 44 routing or BGP
or whatever.
You then get a subnet allocation from your regional AMPRNet IP address
coordinator and register a gateway for that subnet (via the PSU address)
on the portal. Voila', you now have a subnet of AMPRNet routed to your
Linux host via IP-IP encapsulation, and through the technique of tunnel
gatewaying that Linux host is now connected to the AMPRNet, albeit at
a somewhat limited bandwidth."*
*
*
I am not opposed to this, especially since I have not tried it yet.
However, PSU has resources, that if they can be tapped, might enable PSARC
do something equivalant to what USC is doing, but for the state of
Pennsylvania. For one, to further experiment, and also to improve the
bandwidth limitations down the road.
The 'Backbone" connection I expect to get through PSU will be 1
gigabit/sec. If co-located w/ PennREN, we would be sitting on a statewide
10Gb/s middle mile network. And, that is IPv6 now.
It would be a heck of a way to learn!
73, Jim A.
Jim,
Your question sounds similar to one I just asked last week. In my
case, convincing the IT department to forward IPIP to our internal
address isn't likely.
So I have been playing with OpenVpn, and started documenting things.
It looks like it will do what I want. Requests will come to my IPIP
Rip gateway, which will also double as an OpenVPN server, and I'll
route the traffic though that statefull connection.
I have been trying to track down notes/papers/documents that might be of use:
http://www.qsl.net/k/kb9mwr//wapr/tcpip/index.html
Speaking of which, does anyone else have any recommendations on things
that have been written over the years?
I swear I am the only ham in my local club that has at least a basic
understanding of TCP/IP. So anything I can use to help explain things
to newbies would be helpful. I usually just reference the O'Reilly
Books, TCP/IP Administration comes to mind.
Has anything ever been written explaining DNS records with a ham slant?
A gateway had his internet address change yesterday and the new address was
changed to the new address at the gateway successfully..
We've noticed that the RIP process has the correct address but the
encap.txt file does not.
Is there a problem at the gateway with the way it is handling the encap.txt
file when data is changed? It appears that the old file is sent and not
the new one..
73, Don - ve3zda
Excellent explanation Marius.
So how does PPTP compare to openvpn?
I have tried to find a good explanation for the various VPN types,
hamachi, openvpn, pptp, etc.. haven't really found such yet.
C.J. thanks for the examples. I think I know the answer to what I am going
to ask, but..
Could an IPIP tunnel accomplish the same thing that OpenVPN can for the
situation I described (NAT and no modification to a remote firewall)?
Why not?
Hello,
I have tried on a number of occasions to register on the Portal. I
have not received a confirmation email once.
Anyone else having this issue?
Thanks,
Geoff
VA7CWD / VE7KA
I am running a gateway using rip, etc. I really only have wifi radio range
to a couple other hosts. And that is working well.
We have a couple other small wireless networks in town that I can't reach
by radio. They could be connected to the internet but unfortunately would
be behind firewalls that we cannot control.
So till we get things realigned and such, I am looking for examples on how
to create a private tunnel from my gateway to those locations.
It doesn't really make sense to put another gateway in the portal, as I
doubt the rip packets will pass though.
Yes the separate clusters each have separate NAT/firewalls protecting them.
Again, I am not going to be able to convince the people donating that
bandwidth to set our internal ip on their network as a DMZ host.
I plan to write about it, if I ever figure out how to punch a two way
tunnel from me (a place where I have control over such things) to these
places.
What I envision is from the rest of the amprnet, 44.92.21.0/24 comes here
via an IPIP tunnel; and various smaller chunks /29 or /28 go back out from
here via some other capable tunnel to these remote sites till we convince
folks we need to get something up on a decent tower.
It doesn't need to be encrypted or authenticated, whatever is easiest and
will do the job.
--Quote--
I'm unclear on the topology of your network; I'm going to assume that
the separate clusters each have a separate NAT/firewall protecting them.
In that case, I believe you may get the IPIP traffic to pass through the
NAT/firewall to the internal host by designating the internal host as a
DMZ host. You would then register the NAT/firewall's public IP address
as the gateway host.
I'd wager it depends on the software in the NAT/firewall so some may do it
and others may not. I heard that OpenWRT does handle IPIP encapsulation.
I've not tried that myself so others who have done so should comment on
whether this approach actually works.
I'd much appreciate you writing up what you wind up doing and publish
it on the wiki so others may share your experience.
- Brian
First off I don't claim to know much about VPNs and encapsulation.
Everyone I talk to tells me openvpn should do what I want.
I take it that is a state full type of connection?
Brian, the problem I see if if I setup another rip44 listener gateway, how do I
direct the encapped traffic to our natted, internal IP? An entry in the portal
will get it to their router (outside address), but having them place a
forwarding rule to get it from there to out 192 internet address probably won't
happen.
---- Quote------
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:38:01AM -0500, kb9mwr at gmail.com
<http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net> wrote:
>* It doesn't really make sense to put another gateway in the portal, as I*>* doubt the rip packets will pass though.*
The AMPRNet internal RIP packets from 'amprgw' are sent encapsulated,
so if you can do IP-IP tunnels at all, the RIP should get through too.
One way to see whether a firewall will pass IP-IP tunnels is to add
its address as a gateway and see if you get tunnel traffic on the other
side. Since the internal RIP is sent every 5 minutes, it can be a simple
test of your incoming connectivity.
- Brian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Good morning,
I saw some odd routing during my tests. So I analyzed the routes added
by RIP44d. I modified the code to log the command string to add
routes, my suspicions where confirmed: rip44d v1.2 adds every route
with a prefix length of /32:
(examples)
Mar 29 00:45:03 debian rip44d[19323]: LANG=C /sbin/ip route add
44.161.0.0/32 via 141.75.245.225 dev tunl0 window 840 onlink table 44
Mar 29 00:45:03 debian rip44d[19323]: LANG=C /sbin/ip route add
44.129.0.0/32 via 118.22.1.194 dev tunl0 window 840 onlink table 44
Mar 29 00:45:03 debian rip44d[19323]: LANG=C /sbin/ip route add
44.147.0.0/32 via 121.99.232.227 dev tunl0 window 840 onlink table 44
Mar 29 00:45:03 debian rip44d[19323]: LANG=C /sbin/ip route add
44.183.0.0/32 via 130.208.168.63 dev tunl0 window 840 onlink table 44
Mar 29 00:45:03 debian rip44d[19323]: LANG=C /sbin/ip route add
44.94.0.0/32 via 141.224.128.8 dev tunl0 window 840 onlink table 44
All these routes should be /16
I'm trying to figure where the issue comes from, but I'm not a perl
addict, so any help is welcome. I have already confirmed that the RIP
message contains the correct netmask:
IP Address: 44.161.0.0, Metric: 1
Address Family: IP (2)
Route Tag: 4
IP Address: 44.161.0.0 (44.161.0.0)
Netmask: 255.255.0.0 (255.255.0.0)
Next Hop: 141.75.245.225 (141.75.245.225)
Metric: 1
73 de Marc
- --
http://lx1duc.mcs.tel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRVNjWAAoJEHFIN1T8ZA8vteEP/2oD1ic40dvnuZSOOdvS+NNw
BZEaIlI9gmIZ6P2FqJO4ZOs/kXLdKnxDa9hNgAV5+4bZAZyiGQIHFd1+rwIAaZKN
quzJ1h7SzYKOJYDRiMIQO8nYdDzNMYKb4H5GhSpCiDWGHnt+OJA+uV8ZXHClj7QV
y2AvJDKgrcRaf3Lr4kwghVnIHlmqibxPI2fFv8DuG8sBvIkxjtUJ21MOUq6nJD8z
HaCpJRS8169Syl3jq/8DogEvKfjkehaNmczyxWfWcN1t93Lxh+pPGu88iDhh1pNS
3CpVw7nY1aV88fQUURMNRJqB5IEDLyL9z/A6oU8t4u095SS6wj3wbzs7HpY37Oc4
UsLbqLlH88wkc1AnW5PrrzNLNyjEX4/3y1zywhwJFaVWUGRTAVKC3fB8Q4hhg0/M
r6q5LfjbFJzvZYppvsoqDMCAYHsAcg5lTP92+I1/86avntSW1Kj8bIJnrr/wGfZz
zbURMk+9U2WJlX6mnmm/Z0a/Lo+l3/T74CzXDDmr8dvEaMB9r7AeTx3M7h6H/jBi
yNrFZtwCg/ZMDcCR8jtAN8dqNOYht5uL/+N9dPZy50cyMhLjxVItl6BXrUYdXGqD
2p8zXKjwc8iPLuirvXs3cFK4dioDyJviMDTPSXss01zMBpLqj80UVltIV+xmMRf9
x6fcW9WXhFYoLN56hrti
=0CVp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
It seems that you have found the very same issue I have already documented:
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/private/44net/2013-March/000848.htmlhttps://github.com/hessu/rip44d/issues/7
Unfortunately I haven't heard back from the author or someone else and
I'm not a perl developer, so I cannot fix it myself.
Best regards,
Marc
Quoting lleachii(a)aol.com:
The populated route reads:
44.182.21.0 via 89.122.215.236 dev tunl0 onlink window 840
44.182.21.0 is a valid IP address on the ICANN Internet and does not
imply a subnet in any form.
It should contain a /24 notation as in the AMPRPortal:
44.182.21.0/24 via 89.122.215.236 dev tunl0 onlink window 840
No AMPR networks on my routing table (populated by RIP44d) contain the
proper CIDR notations.
Dear Bob VE3TOK (and thanks to VE3ZDA and N2NOV),
Your entry is on my route table, I'm using rip44d (not encap), so my
updates are live. The IP of my gateway is correct in the Portal. I use
the -a switch to remove my own route (and have updated it to the correct
IP); and I still receive rip44d updates over AMPR (showing that I have
not lost connectivity to the Main AMPRGW).
From testing connectivity to your subnet, I have determined that my
44GW is operational; and that some gateways may not have yet updated
their encap.
Thanks for your help; I waited a few days to to be sure that was not the
case; as I know all stations do not have dynamic routing updates, I'll
wait longer next time.
73,
Lynwood
KB3VWG
http://44.60.44.10/tools
@kb3vwg-015:~$ ping 44.135.85.1 -c 10
PING 44.135.85.1 (44.135.85.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 44.135.85.30: icmp_seq=7 Source Quench
From 44.135.85.30: icmp_seq=8 Source Quench
From 44.135.85.30: icmp_seq=9 Source Quench
From 44.135.85.30: icmp_seq=10 Source Quench
--- 44.135.85.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9003ms
@kb3vwg-015:~$ traceroute 44.135.85.30
traceroute to 44.135.85.30 (44.135.85.30), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 kb3vwg-001.ampr.org (44.60.44.1) 0.724 ms 0.238 ms 0.218 ms
2 linux.ve3mch.ampr.org (44.135.85.151) 51.890 ms 55.835 ms 60.720 ms
3 port.ve3mch.ampr.org (44.135.85.30) 63.642 ms 62.613 ms 66.477 ms
@kb3vwg-015:~$ ping 44.135.85.30 -c 5
PING 44.135.85.30 (44.135.85.30) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 44.135.85.30: icmp_req=1 ttl=39 time=53.9 ms
64 bytes from 44.135.85.30: icmp_req=2 ttl=39 time=51.8 ms
64 bytes from 44.135.85.30: icmp_req=3 ttl=39 time=87.4 ms
64 bytes from 44.135.85.30: icmp_req=4 ttl=39 time=52.7 ms
64 bytes from 44.135.85.30: icmp_req=5 ttl=39 time=51.9 ms
--- 44.135.85.30 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 51.899/59.607/87.406/13.919 ms
I know this is fine in regular IP routing, but is it o.k. with the AMPRgw?
I have a gateway that serves a /28 address space.
I'd like to do some testing using a couple of the addresses in that space on
a different gateway.
So, I'd like to add another gateway entry for just those two addresses
without modifying the existing gateway entry for the /28.
Regular IP longest match should prefer the /32 matches for the new gateway
over the longer /28 match for the existing gateway.
But before I implement, I wanted to verify whether or not this would be o.k.
with the portal database, the amprgw RIP routing mechanism, etc.
BTW, this would be a nice, generalized solution for a backup gateway. That
is, if the more specific route goes away, the more general route could be
used.
So, is this o.k. to do or not? If not, why not?
Thanks much,
Michael
N6MEF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello and sorry to bother you with this.
I have added a gateway (46.29.183.253) via the portal and I have added
subnets to it. I can see the encap.txt has been updated and I do receive
RIPv2 Multicast Messages from 44.0.0.1.
I have setup rip44d and it is populating my routing table.
Example:
#ip route get 44.0.0.1
44.0.0.1 via 169.228.66.251 dev tunl0 src 44.161.229.126
cache window 840
However when trying to ping 44.0.0.1 from 44.161.229.126 I don't get any
replies.
I have followed the outgoing ICMP packets, they get encapsulated on my
gateway and the outer IP destination address is 169.228.66.251. The
packet travels without troubles thru AS51405 (the home network of
46.29.183.253) and I can actually see the packet going out to the
transit network (currently AS5577, in case you're interested).
So I'm really really sure that the IPIP packet containing the ICMP echo
request makes it out into the Internet.
I have also ran traces on all of the ingress connections towards AS51405
and I cannot see a single coming back from 169.228.66.251.
Is there anything I'm missing? I really appreciate your help.
BTW I'm allowing inbound packets carrying protocol 4 and ICMP on the
gateway, but as I don't see packets addresses towards my gateway in the
upstream network, I'm guessing it's not the firewall on my gateway H-i.
vy 73 de Marc, LX1DUC
- --
http://lx1duc.mcs.tel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=Yi7/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Good evening dear OMs,
I'm really new to this Mailing-List. I have been reading through the
information available online but I have a few remaining questions:
- - Can there be more than 1 coordinator for one single area (e.g. 2 OMs
handling a country conjointly)?
- - Do the former tunnels still exist for delegations which haven't been
moved/migrated to the new portal? (Or are they offline from the
Internet side of things?)
- - The new system/portal seems to favor a mesh network of tunnels, are
intra-country tunnels (no directly connected to the AMPR gateway but
connected via a local gateway (which in turn is connected to the AMPR
gateway)) depreciated or unrecommended?
- - When I checked a few years ago, very very few networks within
44.0.0.0/8 were announced in the DFZ (like 1 or 2), this seems to have
increased. Is it recommended today to announce a delegation or parts
of it directly?
I'm sorry if these questions have been answered before, I really tried
finding them, but I might have searched using the wrong terms/words.
vy 73 de Marc, LX1DUC
- --
http://lx1duc.mcs.tel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=AKXa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi guys,
there are some "suspicious" entries in encap.txt:
route addprivate 44.131.192/29 encap 44.131.192.1
route addprivate 44.24.115.17/32 encap 44.24.115.17
There are even some other gateways listed with IP-addresses out of 44/8.
73,
Jann
DG8NGN
--
Jann Traschewski, Lenbachstr. 6, D-90489 Nuernberg, Germany
Tel.: +49-911-696971, Mobile: +49-170-1045937, E-Mail: jann(a)gmx.de
Ham: DG8NGN / DB0VOX, http://www.qsl.net/dg8ngn
Bill, WA7NWP,
I'm not sure this is best suggestion for many reasons:
- There was a discussion a few weeks back where it was determined that
all stations do not necessarily run telnet (while having others test
connectivity to my station, some were attempting to telnet to me). For
example, my station is not a TNOS/JNOS based router, and therefore does
not provide Converse (the telnet-based service we're referring to) by
default. Under that guideline, my allocation would be purged.
- We also determined that, while all stations should make their IP
addresses ping-able, that was not necessarily the case (either by intent
or error).
- For various reasons, AMPRNet allocations may not necessarily be online
or available through AMPR
- A Station does not necessarily have to download the encap to have a
working allocation (one could manually add static routes from the portal
list or use RIP44, for example)
- It would be impossible to use the download guideline for those using
the RIP44 routing protocol, as it is multicast; and doesn't know what
stations are receiving it or using it
We have to be mindful that all stations may not be identically
configured, use the same Operating Systems, routing protocols nor system
configurations to accomplish connectivity to AMPRNet.
73,
Lynwood
KB3VWG
On 03/12/2013 03:00 PM, 44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> Automate it for now and the future... If a client doesn't
> ping/poke/telnet/download or whatever within 30days/3months/whatever -
> purge the entry. You know - just like DHCP but at a higher level..
> :)
>
> Bill, WA7NWP
Just have them login once a year and reup their registration.. Like they
make you do for repeater coordination.. Allow a 90 day grace period and then
lock it for 30 days if still no contact they obviously have abandon it.. or
will return when they realize it is down.. Time frames I suggest are just
that.
That way no notice, no email reminders, no bother to the system or anyone..
They must login or get booted... Not trying to be mean.. but lets say ham A
has died.. The portal may never know this... Lets say they changed email, no
email reminder will ever reach them.. Let's say they lost interest, even an
email or post card could simply get ignored..
If it's simple and the system can send an email to the Last Known Good email
at say 11 Months... Fine.. Or make it a rolling 12 months from last login to
the portal.. But no need to make it any more than simple..
Let's keep its K.I.S.S
73
Sorry working late and bored.. lol
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+n9lya=blueriver.net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+n9lya=blueriver.net@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of
lleachii(a)aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 4:37 PM
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [44net] Portal registrations
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Bill, WA7NWP,
I'm not sure this is best suggestion for many reasons:
- There was a discussion a few weeks back where it was determined that all
stations do not necessarily run telnet (while having others test
connectivity to my station, some were attempting to telnet to me). For
example, my station is not a TNOS/JNOS based router, and therefore does not
provide Converse (the telnet-based service we're referring to) by default.
Under that guideline, my allocation would be purged.
- We also determined that, while all stations should make their IP addresses
ping-able, that was not necessarily the case (either by intent or error).
- For various reasons, AMPRNet allocations may not necessarily be online or
available through AMPR
- A Station does not necessarily have to download the encap to have a
working allocation (one could manually add static routes from the portal
list or use RIP44, for example)
- It would be impossible to use the download guideline for those using the
RIP44 routing protocol, as it is multicast; and doesn't know what stations
are receiving it or using it
We have to be mindful that all stations may not be identically configured,
use the same Operating Systems, routing protocols nor system configurations
to accomplish connectivity to AMPRNet.
73,
Lynwood
KB3VWG
On 03/12/2013 03:00 PM, 44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> Automate it for now and the future... If a client doesn't
> ping/poke/telnet/download or whatever within 30days/3months/whatever -
> purge the entry. You know - just like DHCP but at a higher level..
> :)
>
> Bill, WA7NWP
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44nethttp://www.ampr.org/donate.html
I've lost track of the status of the portal functionality.
We have a block of addresses allocated to our county network (44.4.50.0/28).
I also have two addresses allocated for my personal machines (44.4.2.152,
44.4.2.153)
But when I log into the portal I see no active records.
At some point will the existing records appear in the portal when I log in?
Thanks
N6MEF
I don't understand how I can allocate anything out of 44.135.0.0/16
Since I still can allocate host out of Ampr host robot at UCSD. You need a guide for this website
----- Reply message -----
From: "Brian Kantor" <Brian(a)ucsd.edu>
To: "AMPRNet working group" <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Subject: [44net] Portal registrations
Date: Mon, Mar 11, 2013 13:20
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
It's especially important for the area coordinators to get themselves
registered as such with the portal. I think that in a few months we'll
just have to consider any regions with no registered coordinator as
abandoned by their former coordinators.
Similarly with gateways: at some time in the future gateways which aren't
registered with the portal will have to be dropped from the encap file.
People with existing allocations should make sure that their own allocation
is registered with the portal, if necessary by going through the portal
allocation process. If you do this, be sure to include a note that it's
a re-registration of an existing allocation.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44nethttp://www.ampr.org/donate.html
Hi All,
FYI - There was a bug in the code that emailed out the encap file to anyone that had the "only when changed" option set, resulting in the encap file not being emailed at all to them.
The bug has now been identified and fixed, so if anyone wants to receive an emailed copy of the encap file only when anything has changed, please login to the portal and click on: "Gateways" -> "Options" and alter the "Frequency" to "Only when changed".
If you do not wish to receive an email copy of the encap file, please ensure that the "Email" field on this same page is blank.
Thanks,
Chris
Following requests from co-ordinators, I have added some additional functionality to the portal.
If you are a country or regional co-ordinator you now have an extra menu link "IP Allocations" from where you can view / edit all the subnets you have allocated.
73
Chris - G1FEF
Here are "all" the IANA assigned numbers, if we're gonna get technical :)
"Private-Use" being really the important ones.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv4-special-registry/iana-ipv4-specia…
Tim Osburn
www.osburn.com
206.812.6214
W7RSZ
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Jann Traschewski wrote:
> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:41:34 +0100
> From: Jann Traschewski <jann(a)gmx.de>
> Reply-To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
> To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
> Subject: Re: [44net] encap.txt
>
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
>> For now I have block most of the bogons plus 44/8 thusly:
>>
>> /^(0.|10.|44.|127.|169.154.|192.168.|224.)/
>
> Isn't it 169.254. ?
>
>> When I have more time I will create a more elegant table based filter, so we
>> can allow/deny subnets.
>
> Maybe it is worth to put 172.16.|172.17.|...|172.31. into the list (if
> it will not "break" the line :D)
>
> 73,
> Jann
>
>
> --
> Jann Traschewski, Lenbachstr. 6, D-90489 Nuernberg, Germany
> Tel.: +49-911-696971, Mobile: +49-170-1045937, E-Mail: jann(a)gmx.de
> Ham: DG8NGN / DB0VOX, http://www.qsl.net/dg8ngn
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
> http://www.ampr.org/donate.html
>
The portal has all the visible text in a separate language file, so can very easily be translated into other languages, but I need some willing volunteers!
So, if anyone is willing to create and maintain alternative languages for the portal, please could they drop me an email. I know a couple of people did mention this in the past, but if you could get in touch again, I am now ready to deploy the language files.
Thanks,
Chris
KK6CND [Chris Foreman],
Please resubmit your allocation request to the AMPR portal. I forgot
to allocate a proper IP address to your previous request.
--
Geoff Joy - ke6qh -
AmprNet IP Address Coordinator for San Bernardino & Riverside Counties.
geoff(a)windomeister.com
Steve,
I am running EchoLink Proxies at 44.60.44.253:443 and 44:60.44.254:80
I am woking on a SIP based VoIP system, it is not up at this time.
~Lynwood
KB3VWG
Hey folks,
I'm going to stand up a quagga server over at 44net-tunnel-endpoint.org
in the next week or so. Would any of you be willing to give me a
private feed of the v4 table (and v6 if you've got it) using a reserved
AS number on my end? It's been a while since I've done this, so be
gentle with me ;-)
From http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1930:
10. Reserved AS Numbers
The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the
following block of AS numbers for private use (not to be advertised
on the global Internet):
64512 through 65535
Thanks much!
C.J.
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> Last time I tried doing
> whois on a name it failed. The spammers have made it impossible to put up a
> whois because they mined them all for valid emails so organizations had to
> abandon it.
Maybe it varies between TLDs. I never got much spam that I could trace to .nl domain
name registration (note that .nl now no longer reveals contact info via whois, but they
used to in the past).
On the other hand, what really buried me in spam is registering for some port
numbers and a organization unique ID at IANA. They published the requester's
mail in a text file on their site, and for port numbers it is in /etc/services. I have
had to abandon some mail addresses because of it.
Rob
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.eduwrote:
> Rob,
>
> I have a dutch licence and there is nothing in there about host names.
>
> Is this only a requirement for unattended gateways as these need a
> separate licence
> from the government there?
>
> Bob (Boudewijn) VE3TOK
I reply to this item only to avoid posting several messages, but I have read the other replies as well.
Back in the days when we were still doing a packet network, the situation was like this:
The license said "each packet should be identified by the callsigns of the station where the
traffic originates from, and the station that is actually transmitting the packet".
This made point-to-point packet legal, as well as digipeated packet. Both comply to that
requirement.
The method used by NET/ROM was illegal. It transmitted packets from the nodes using a modified
originator callsign. The packets had the callsign of the original source, but not the callsign of
the node that was transmitting them. When I adapted NET/ROM into NET, I created a system
where the exit node transmitted a "faked" digipeated packet that looked like if the node had
actually digipeated a packet (while it in fact was making a downlink connection). That made it
formally compliant to the license requirements, and was also more convenient for the users as
it showed where the traffic was actually coming from. The same thing was done in Germany,
in other software.
Then look at IP. An IP packet transmitted via the network and sent by a node/router has the
AX.25 callsign of the node transmitting it, but does not carry the callsign of the original source.
Someone consulted the authorities about it. He got the assertion that it would be accepted
as identification if there would be a publicly available mapping between IP address and callsign,
so they could consult that when wanting to determine the source of the traffic.
All the time after that, the hosts file for the Netherlands has been publicly available both on
the BBS system and on telephone BBS (in those days) and Internet (later). And there was the
Internet DNS with this information.
It may be that the current license no longer explicitly states the callsign requirements, there
have been changes. I just have continued to always use the callsign as part of all hostnames
assigned to allocated IP addresses within 44.137... (callsign.ampr.org or label.callsign.ampr.org)
Note that all this is only the situation in the Netherlands, I have no idea how regulations are
in the US or elsewhere. Also note that all this is mostly academic, as packet radio is now
formally illegal in the Netherlands except for stations with a "notice of variation" for unattended
operation.
Why that, you ask? Well, it went like this. There has always been a NOV requirement for
unattended stations. Nodes, repeaters, BBSes etc required such a notice from the authorities
to allow operation without the operator being present. User's packet stations did not require
this NOV as long as the operator was present during use of the station. And many operated
on the edges of what was really allowed, it wasn't really enforcible anyway.
(e.g. the station transmitting a file while you are watching TV or sleeping, is that "attended"?)
Of course an unattended phone repeater also requires a NOV. To get one, one needs to fulfill certain
criteria like a minimal distance to another repeater on the same band. And there is co-ordination
to distribute the limited number of channels. There are always some people do not want to play
within those rules and started operating "attended repeaters" on all kinds of imaginable
channels, and D-STAR hotspots, sometimes after a request for an NOV was denied to them.
It somehow irritated the authorities and they redefined the "attended" requirement: it must be
the operator himself, either directly or via some authenticated link guaranteeing it to be only him,
who keys the transmitter. A repeater or hotspot, where the transmitter is keyed by the reception
of a signal not from the operator, is now declared to be in requirement of an NOV no matter if
the operator is actually present or not.
And it is also stated that there will be increased effort to monitor and effectuate this regulation.
Unfortunately, a packet station, even with the operator sitting at the keyboard, is now outside
these bounds. The transmitter is keyed as a result of someone transmitting towards you, if only
to transmit an acknowledgement. And this is explicitly no longer allowed in the definition.
I have no idea if this has been the intention and what they now actually think about packet.
It is very likely that we are only the victim of the desire to regulate the phone repeater mess,
and it was not the intention to disallow point-to-point packet or user-to-node packet as well.
Rob
I am glad to see that IPv6 being available Looking forward on the
progress.
K6DLC
--
Daniel Curry
PGP: AD5A 96DC 7556 A020 B8E7 0E4D 5D5E 9BA5 C83E 8C92
IPv6 Sage Certified
San Francisco/Silicon Valley AmprNet Co-coordinator [44.4.0.0/16]
All,
Has anyone attempted to setup an AMPR gateway using Microsoft Windows (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc940485.aspx)?
I surmise that the tunnel setup is straightforward; and ActiveState ActivePerl (http://www.activestate.com/activeperl) can be used to run RIP44d, I have not reviewed the RIP44d file as of yet; but I assume editing the line that adds routes to the Routing Table would be all that is needed. The Perl Packages 'interface' and 'IO-Socket-Multicast' are available through ActivePerl for Windows, has anyone tried a Microsoft setup before; did you have success/failure?
I wanted to make sure no one has already tried the Windows OS before I explore; and if they have, can they provide some insight and instructions.
73,
Lynwood
KB3VWG
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> the DNS functionality is a separate module and is not tied to the name of the IP/subnet, not everyone uses their callsign as the DNS name
But that is a license requirement! We need a mapping between IP address and callsign for legal use of IP on amateur radio....
(ID requirement)
Rob
Tony, AH6BW, has set up an IPv6 proxy to enable IPv6ers to reach
www.ampr.org.
This should have no effect on ordinary IPv4 access to the site,
but if you have any trouble reaching it, please let me know.
FYI, the entry in the nameserver to implement this is
www IN AAAA 2605:b00:0:2:211:2fff:fef6:4287
which is how the address for an IPv6 host is entered in the
the 'bind' nameserver.
- Brian
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
>> >But it has the disadvantage that you spread the rarely occurring task over many
>> >people who do it only once and do not have the knowledge and skills to perform
>> >it well. I'm afraid this will lead to many wrong subnet specifications (already seen),
>> >strange names in the DNS, questions, etc.
> That's just a learning curve which is easily fixed.
I think it is better to have the learning curve once and not for every user.
It is already very unclear to me (as an expert in IP addressing and a long-time co-ordinator)
what the system will exactly do when I perform certain actions, and I think it will be nothing
short of a mystery to those that just want an address and have no idea how IP addresses
are structured, what subnets are, and how DNS fits in.
>
>> >I prefer to handle the task for the entire country and have the system only
>> >administer what has been assigned, not delegate the subassignments. It is
>> >a small country and I get only a couple of requests per year these days.
> The system is flexible, if that is how you want to administer the subnet you are responsible for, then go ahead, all your allocations will therefore be to end users instead of regional co-ordinators and it will be your responsibility to keep the portal up to date and if there are any problems, you will be the point of contact to respond and fix the problem. It's more work for you, but if that is how you prefer to manage your subnet I don't see a problem.
>
> I guess what we need is a facility for co-ordinators to enter allocations to end users manually, I can sort that out.
>
> Regards,
> Chris
>
I don't mind if users can submit requests for subnets via the system, as long as that does not automatically
mean that they become the co-ordinator for that subnet. They get the adressing space, submit the
requests for names within that space, and I validate them. That is how it has always worked, and
it has served well to prevent silly stuff like non-callsign entries directly under ampr.org from appearing
within the 44.137 subnet.
For single adresses, it would be preferable if there is a single request form that supplies both the name
and desired subnet, and leaves the assignment of the address to the co-ordinator, who approves
the entire request in a single action.
But if that is too much programming work and it is more convenient to leave the separation between
address assignment and DNS mapping, that is not a real problem because of the current rate of
requests.
Rob
I'm seeing a lot of good things in the works in the reforming of
amprNET/net44 including how ip address assignments and allocations are to
be handled and managed, routing info exchanged dynamically via rip and
other protocols, and the moving away from a single central point which all
traffic has to essentially tunnel to as address space can now once
allocated be tied to the appropriate AS and routed via BGP. all great
things being done. there are a few things though I have not heard
happening that I'll ask if they have been considered and what others
thoughts may be. This for the most part deals with a gateway operator
being able to manage the DNS zones pertaining to the operation of their
gateway and it's users.
for the sake of discussion lets say we have a gateway operator with a /24
block assigned to their gateway and let's say that block is
44.128.128.0/24and lets say their call was gw4opr:
I would propose that along with the allocation of that block that gateway
operator have the option to host and manage the 128.128.44.in-addr.arpa
zone on their DNS servers.
I would also propose that those who would choose to could host and manage
their own DNS zones, in this instance *.gw4opr.ampr.org.
It seems to just make sense that reverse dns would be managed by the ones
responsible for and closest to the address space assigned and that one
ought to be able to manage their own DNS zone without having to go through
their address coordinator for every last dns update as long as they are
willing to accept delegation of responsibility for their zone.
what are the thoughts on this from others on this list? Personally I think
delegation of zones is a great idea, but perhaps I missed something. it
would seem to further lighten the load on local coordinators. That said,
why should we or why should we not plan for, allow, and even encourage,
delegation and self management of DNS zones directly by those closest
connected to and most responsible for them?
AF6EP
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> An example: if I'm the San Diego county coordinator, and I assign a /24
> to AA6ZZ for a gateway in the Santee city area, he can become the
> coordinator for that /24, and assign addresses from his block of 256
> addresses to the clients of his gateway.
>
> Likewise:
> 44.0.0.0/9 is assigned to the USA, with me as the current USA coordinator,
> 44.124.0.0/16 is assigned to Arizona and handled by the AZ coordinator
> 44.124.128.0/24 might be assigned to a gateway in Phoenix who would then
> handle address assignments for the clients of that gateway.
>
> So by registering gateway operators as coordinators for their gateway's
> subnet, we localize the network management to the people who are the
> best situated to handle it.
But it has the disadvantage that you spread the rarely occurring task over many
people who do it only once and do not have the knowledge and skills to perform
it well. I'm afraid this will lead to many wrong subnet specifications (already seen),
strange names in the DNS, questions, etc.
I prefer to handle the task for the entire country and have the system only
administer what has been assigned, not delegate the subassignments. It is
a small country and I get only a couple of requests per year these days.
Rob
> User registration and network management are separate functions. I think
> that after a user registers, any network (address, LAN, etc.) requests go
> to the coordinator for that address space.
An example: if I'm the San Diego county coordinator, and I assign a /24
to AA6ZZ for a gateway in the Santee city area, he can become the
coordinator for that /24, and assign addresses from his block of 256
addresses to the clients of his gateway.
Likewise:
44.0.0.0/9 is assigned to the USA, with me as the current USA coordinator,
44.124.0.0/16 is assigned to Arizona and handled by the AZ coordinator
44.124.128.0/24 might be assigned to a gateway in Phoenix who would then
handle address assignments for the clients of that gateway.
So by registering gateway operators as coordinators for their gateway's
subnet, we localize the network management to the people who are the
best situated to handle it.
A new ham in Phoenix who wants to get on AMPRNet registers, goes to the
networks section, clicks on USA, clicks on Arizona, sees the gateway
registered in his area, and clicks on that to request an allocation.
The gateway operator picks an available address, say 44.124.128.17,
registers it and things are good to go. No need to wait for the state
or national coordinator.
You don't have to register nor log in just to view the network allocations
and who the coordinator is, so folks who just want to know if there's
a subnet or gateway in their area can see.
- Brian
I think that there is a problem with a new allocation inside France 44.151.0.0.
https://portal.ampr.org/networks.php?a=region&id=295
There is a declaration of one single user (not a network) with a /16 at the
end...
> Network Country Region Allocated to
> 44.151.67.22/16 FR Alsace F6EQN [Michel BELLEZIT]
Furtheremore, on his website, F5PBG invites all french users to register
individually their IP on the "ampr.org" website. This will induce a lot of
useless declarations.
http://inforadio.free.fr/articles.php?lng=fr&pg=85
> # Changement de fonctionnement du réseau AMPR :
> # INSCRIPTION OBLIGATOIRE POUR ETRE PRIS EN COMPTE
> # à cette adresse : https://portal.ampr.org/ (Onglet "Register")
> # puis après connexion réalisez votre demande (Onglet "Networks")
Translation of this extract :
> The AMPR network has changed
> Registration is compulsory
> at this adress : https://portal.ampr.org/
> click on "register",
> and then after connexion,
> put your request, click on "network".
I think that an admin could delete this declaration, and put a reminder about
what is an allocation, and what is a network, a subnet, etc...
Thanks.
Hi,
Any news about support for Dynamic IP Gateways yet without having to
pester other Gateways having static IPs via AXUDP links?
--
73 de SV1UY
Demetre Ch. Valaris
e-mail: demetre.sv1uy(a)gmail.com
Radio e-mail: sv1uy(a)winlink.org
http://www.qsl.net/sv1uy
Hello gang.
Could an ip coordinator send me via direct email the email robot's address
for adding and updating amprnet ip addresses?
Thanks
Harold
K7ilo (formerly KB7RSI)
Southern Nevada Ip Coordinator
What you have for a network over there makes me jealous.
I guess I'd like to know what in terms of content is on the amprnet.
I know there are some AXIP BBS style feeds and that sort of thing.
Is anyone running a mailman mailing list of anything interesting? For
higher speed radio connections are there any SIP/Asterisk conference
servers, or at least FTP repositories of ham stuff? Stuff that is
exclusive to the network.
I have some point to point 802.11 links over here that I have been
using 44 addresses on for a few years. But they haven't been
connected to the rest of the amprnet. Is there a compelling reason to
setup a gateway to the rest of the amprnet.
73'
Steve
----Original---
Btw: We are currently deploying our IP management system for the HAMNET
network: http://hamnetdb.net/?m=as&q=&as=-All-&tab=map
You should be able to do a traceroute to all "green" sites... Click on a
site and you get the description.
73,
Jann
DG8NGN
On 31.01.2013 21:09, kb9mwr at gmail.com wrote:
> I have one from Sept 2012 if anyone wants it.
>
> I second the importance of the data in that file. It's really the
> only thing we had to tell what is on the amprnet, in terms of
> services, and the speeds of the connected radio subnets, etc.
I have one from Sept 2012 if anyone wants it.
I second the importance of the data in that file. It's really the
only thing we had to tell what is on the amprnet, in terms of
services, and the speeds of the connected radio subnets, etc.
> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:05:14 -0800
> From: Jack Eifer <jeifer(a)cwo.com>
> To: AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
> Subject: Re: [44net] ip updating
>
> Chris,
>
> While we're on the subject of TODO's,
> Has any consideration or thought been given to resurrecting the 'GATEWAY' file that Fuller maintained ?
>
> I found the information in file useful and easy to access. Perhaps the new website has the same info embedded, but somewhere I've yet to discover.
>
> Jack, AA6HF
Just a reminder for everyone, especially address coordinators,
to please register with the portal. https://portal.ampr.org/
And a big thank you to those thoughtful folks who have donated
to keeping the organization running. If you haven't yet sent
in a donation, it's as easy as clicking on the donate link at
the bottom of this message or on our web page. Even $25 would
be a great help.
Thank you!
- Brian
As the next step in deployment of the AMPRNet Portal, we're going to begin
using it to refer people to their coordinators. How this works is this:
A ham wanting an address assignment will register with the portal and
click on the NETWORKS selection. He'll be presented with a list of
countries; for some countries, clicking on that entry will get him to a
list of regions within the country, etc. If there isn't a coordinator
registered with the portal for his particular area (or country), he'll
have to pick the enclosing region.
Eg, if there isn't an entry for say, Alabama, he'll pick the USA entry
and I'll get the request. I can then allocate a block for Alabama
(rather, I'll use the one that's already set aside for that state)
and assign him an address from that block. I'll probably ask him
if he'd like to become the coordinator too. (Always looking for
volunteers.)
Once his region is selected, he'll be presented with a simple form that
asks what netwidth he wants (/32 for a single host, /24 for the typical
256 host subnet, etc), how he's planning on connecting to the greater
internet, and a Notes area in which he can explain anything special about
his request. This will generate an email to the coordinator registered
for the subnet he clicked on above, who can request further particulars
if needed.
The above procedure is mentioned in the FAQ on the www.ampr.org website.
What's the advantage to doing it this way? Among other things, it means
that there is no longer the problem of finding the email address of a
coordinator from an always-outdated list. It's less work for me to handle
referrals, and the portal mechanism will ensure that there is consistent
data for everyone.
It's very important that every coordinator get registered with the
portal for this system to work. I urge everyone on this mailing list
to register, and those of you who are coordinators should contact Chris
to get your registration listed as the coordinator for your region.
Thank you!
- Brian
To replay Chris's instructions:
_______________________________________________
Now is probably a good time to ask everyone that is currently using an
IP or IPs from the 44/8 to register on the portal:
https://portal.ampr.org
Click on the "Register" link to the right of "Home" in the top menu. Fill
in the details requested and hit the "Register" button, you will be
sent an email with a link you need to click on to verify your email
address. When you click the link the web page will ask you to enter
the username you entered on the original request, click the "Confirm"
button and your login details will be emailed back to you.
Use the details to login to https://portal.ampr.org
Your first job should be to change your password to something secure
that you will remember: Click on the "Profile" menu link, to the right
of "Allocations". Here you can update your details, including your login
password.
If you already operate a gateway, please drop me an email and I can
assign it to your account.
If you already have subnets allocated to you within the 44/8 please drop
me an email and, as per the gateways, I can assign them to your account.
If you are a country co-ordinator or a regional co-ordinator, please
get in touch asap, so you can be setup on the portal to manage the
allocations of your subnets.
Thanks,
Chris - G1FEF
_________________________________________
A plea to all you graphic design artists out there...
It would be good if we could come up with a logo to use across the main ampr.org website, the portal, the wiki, etc.
I've attached one I did and one derived from one that Jim Fullers had on his site when it was active.
Food for thought, but if anyone can come up with a really cool logo that we all like...
Thanks,
Chris
Don and Marius,
I can reach you both, with no issues.
From those who have offered their Subnet information:
- I can reach all 3 of you (Don, Bob and Marius) [from 44.60.44.0/24 to you]
therefore, encapsulation must be working at all stations, and our routes
are up-to-date
- Don 44.135.90.0/24 is unable to reach me or Bob
- Marius 44.182.21.0/24 can reach Bob; he cannot reach me
Don and Marius, defnately keep us up-to-date about why you cannot ping
me. What Network OS are you using for AMPRnet (*nix/rip44, JNOS, TNOS)?
~Lynwood
I have noticed there is something with 44 addresses and Windows too.
I have never been able to ping a 44 address from Windows, while they
work proper from a Linux terminal.
All pings to 44 address from Windows result in "Destination host
unreachable" (even 44.0.0.1)
It's no big deal for me, but have never really figured out why this is.
> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 00:34:06 +0200
> From: "Marius Petrescu" <marius(a)yo2loj.ro>
> To: <n2nov(a)n2nov.net>, "'AMPRNet working group'"
> <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
> Subject: Re: [44net] Gateways Unreachable after Dynamic IP Update
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running debian 6, updates via RIP. Working from a windows PC behind the
> server acting as router.
>
> Check the route your response packets take on their way out.
> If you initiate the ping you get the response correctly back due to
> connection tracking mechanisms.
> This doesn't mean that responses to icmp requests necessarely do the same.
> E.g. responses may go via a default gateway which is not correct.
> Make sure your answers go out on the same interface they came in.
>
> sooo...
>
> Pinging 44.2.10.1 with 32 bytes of data:
> Reply from 44.2.10.1: bytes=32 time=226ms TTL=222
>
> Pinging 44.68.41.1 with 32 bytes of data:
> Reply from 44.68.41.1: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=28
>
> But then...
>
> C:\Users\Marius>ping 44.60.44.1
>
> Pinging 44.60.44.1 with 32 bytes of data:
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
> Request timed out.
>
> Ping statistics for 44.60.44.1:
> Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
>
> 73's
> Marius, yo2loj
All,
I'm experiencing a technical issue that began when my dynamic WAN
address obtained a new lease. I am no longer able to communicate with
other 44 subnets after my WAN obtained a new IP address. My gateway is
saved in the Portal with a dynamic domain name, and the IP is correctly
displayed on the portal.ampr.org website. In addition, I have also
updated my IP under the rip44d -a parameter.
I am still able to receive the RIP44 announcements from 44.0.0.1 and
communicate with the Internet via the tunnel thru AMPRGW; but I am no
longer able to reach other AMPR networks. My WAN IP changed on 11JAN2013.
Please feel free to perform any of the following, or let me know if I am
reachable via AMPR:
Ping/traceroute Router 44.60.44.1
Ping and DNS 44.60.44.3
Ping and HTTP at 44.60.44.10, 44.60.44.11 and 44.60.44.12
Regards,
Lynwood
KB3VWG
44.60.44.0/24
Hi Folks,
A new Wiki was setup a little while ago: http://wiki.ampr.org
Unfortunately it got vandalised and there were only a couple of minor contributions.
I've reset it, this time with restricted edit rights. If you wish to contribute ( and the hope is that many will ), please drop me an email and I will set you up a login. All I need is your preferred username and email address, I will assign a random password and email it back to you.
Thanks,
Chris - G1FEF
I was lost and now I am found!
73 Thanks everyone for the help.. And push to try again..
Jerry Kutche
Electrical Supervisor
Lehigh Cement Company LLC
180 N. Meridian Road
Mitchell, IN 47446
Phone: (812) 849-2191 ext. 251
Fax: (812) 849-5007
Cell: (812) 583-0445
jkutche(a)lehighcement.com<mailto:jkutche@lehighcement.com>
www.lehighcement.com<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\kmundy\Application%20Data\Microsoft\S…>
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
The sysops of the following WWconvers nodes need to contact SP1LOP, by
registering at http://www.wwconvers.ampr.org/wwcbook/addwwc.html, with station
details to be accurately placed on the map at http://www.wwconvers.ampr.org
(or else your station will be lost at sea in the South Pacific). :-)
BWATER_NS
LAXNET_US
N9LYA
WARDCOVE2
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Net Mon. @ 8:30PM 147.360/107.2 PL
http://www.nyc-arecs.org and http://www.nyc-skywarn.org
NYDXA SWL & Scanner Net Wed. @ 9PM 147.360/107.2 PL
http://www.n2nov.net
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
Ciao Don,
we are tuning CisarNet for managing directly delegated CIDR 44.208/16...So I
missconfigured our main gateway.. Now it should be OK. Please let us know.
Sorry ;-)
Ciao from Italy.
IW0SAB Renzo.
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: ve3zda(a)gmail.com
>Data: 31/12/2012 17.51
>A: <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>Ogg: [44net] (no subject)
>
>(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>_______________________________________________
>Whoever owns station iq0rf.cisarnet.ampr.org. please top transmitting
>to ve3zda.ampr.org.
>It's been repeatedly sending encapped lines since yesterday and getting
>nowhere of course....
>
>here's an example of the line I'm getting...ever second or two.....
>
>16:37:34.478957 IP 94.101.48.134 > 192.168.1.150: IP 44.208.0.1 >
>224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length: 56 (ipip-proto-4)
>
>73, Don - ve3zda
>_________________________________________
>44Net mailing list
>44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>
Whoever owns station iq0rf.cisarnet.ampr.org. please top transmitting
to ve3zda.ampr.org.
It's been repeatedly sending encapped lines since yesterday and getting
nowhere of course....
here's an example of the line I'm getting...ever second or two.....
16:37:34.478957 IP 94.101.48.134 > 192.168.1.150: IP 44.208.0.1 >
224.0.0.5: OSPFv2, Hello, length: 56 (ipip-proto-4)
73, Don - ve3zda
Just something I've noticed, I'm sure there are gurus on here that can
add to it, or totally take it apart - I'd like to hear your thoughts.
> First of all, I hope everyone had an okay christmas. As well, I
> would like to wish everyone the best for the upcoming new year.
>
> Has JNOS always been 'slow' ?
>
> This might be hard for me to explain, but when you are connected
> to a JNOS station and you hit enter to send a command, you may have
> noticed it might take a 'second' for it to be 'processed'. It's not
> a lightning fast response time is it now. I noticed this while trying
> to connect to my own JNOS via a 3 'wire' led/phototransistor dummy
> serial load (bounces data right back at the same interface). And to
> be frank, I've noticed it in many other occasions. Forwarding should
> never take so long, netrom is always painfully slow, and so on.
>
> Was it always like this (for the linux version) ?
>
> Or did this start happening back when I did the kernel change, back
> when I was somewhat forced to use the setcontext() functions instead
> of setjmp() calls and such. Version 2.0e and earlier use setjmp()
> methodology, 2.0f and older use the setcontext() functions.
>
> Was the DOS version the same too ?
>
> SOOOO - Want to see JNOS go like lightning ? It's easy enough :
>
> edit timer.h, change MSPTICK to 1 (normally it's 55)
>
> rm domain.o main.o rspf.o timer.o unix.o
>
> make
>
> CONSEQUENCES - your timers will expire much faster now, but the system
> clock will be fine. But as an experiment, give it a try, tell me what you
> think. Not sure if this was always the way it was, perhaps due to inadequate
> CPU for it's time, I don't know.
>
> I'm going to play with this a bit, a patch will be released in the near
> future so that the timers behave, but JNOS will suddenly come to life !
>
> I've known about this for some time, but my experimenting that I've been
> doing over the christmas holidays kinda brought it up again. Never thought
> how noticing the delay between laser diode flashes can refresh one's memory
> on the topic.
>
> Maiko Langelaar / VE4KLM
>
> howdy all, have been looking into inter-operability of INP3 with netrom
> quality-based routing, and see there has been work done for older
> kernels but cannot find anything recent:
>
> http://sharon.pi8zaa.ampr.org/users/pe1rxq/inp3.html
>
>
> Maiko has ported this code to jnos I believe, but I don't see any
> linux-native ports of the code more recent than kernel 2.6.4...I'm
> running linux mint 10 and
> mint 13 in my machines, and the kernel is much newer, haven't tried the
> patch yet on the newer 3.0+ kernels, anyone had any experience with this?
> Cheers,
> John
Hi John,
I ported the patch to kernel 2.6.35, which I believe is what Mint 10 is based on.
However, I found serious deadlock issues that arise when nodes are withdrawn. For details, and a link to the ported patch, see my post here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-hams/msg03116.html
73, Matt VK2RQ
There is a tunnel on the encap list that needs correction (recursive
routing):
route addprivate 44.131.192/29 encap 44.131.192.1
I have also noticed that routing from the public internet doesn't go any
further than the 132.239.255.131 host at UCSD, but I've only spot test a
few hosts other than myself.
If anyone is interested in using a Cisco router for GW connectivity, I
have a 7206 (non VXR) chassis(empty) up for grabs/trade.
73
Jason
??
----- Original Message -----
From: 44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu <44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
To: 'AMPRNet working group' <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Thu Nov 29 01:33:46 2012
Subject: Re: [44net] AMPRNet Gateways update
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hi Chris,
I have an existing entry I need transferred so that I can manage it as I
need to change my tcpip address.
Username on new system is eddie.
Entery to transfer is
route addprivate 44.147/16 encap 121.98.130.16
73 and thanks
Eddie Olson ZL2AQY
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+eddie=olson.net.nz(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+eddie=olson.net.nz@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of
Chris Smith
Sent: 09 October 2012 21:45
To: AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] AMPRNet Gateways update
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Another point I should mention concerning the new portal and Gateways robot:
All of the current Gateway data has been imported into the new system. This
means that if you already have a gateway registered on the current system,
it will be present on the new system, so there is no need to add it.
The downside to this, is that if you register on the portal to manage your
gateway, it will not simply "appear" on your account. This is because it is
already present on a default account.
The solution is to contact me with your gateway details (Username as
registered on the portal, Gateway IP and Subnets serviced) and I will
transfer it across to your account.
Thanks,
Chris
G1FEF
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
With the kind assistance of Jim Fuller, Maiko Langelaar and Chris Smith
have been working on an update of the AMPR gateways processing system.
That project is now ready for service.
Beginning October 15th 2012, updates to the gateways will be processed
on a new host, portal.ampr.org, and the encap file will be distributed
from there. Both email distribution and ftp retrieval are supported,
as they were with the previous ampr-gateways host.
The new gateways robot mailing address is
gateways(a)ampr.org
Your logins and passwords from the previous gateways system should continue
to work on the new portal. The syntax and content of the various commands
and parameters for the robot are quite similar to the previous version; you
can get the details from the manual page for the new robot.
https://portal.ampr.org/gateways_manpage.php
I would like to personally thank Jim Fuller for his many years of service
to the AMPRNet gateways community and wish him well. We couldn't have
done it without you! Thank you, Jim!
- Brian
PS: My apologies if you receive more than one copy of this note.
Could be useful to distinguish, as an Internet domain registration, the
Organization (Registrant), from Legal representative (admin contact), from Tech
representative (tech Contact), and NSP references (as a Registrar contact) ? In
this way should be:
Organization name:
Organization postal address:
Organization email:
[Modified] Admin Representative name:
[Modified] Admin Representative callsign:
[Modified] Admin Representative email:
[Modified] Admin Representative telephone:
[New] Tech Representative name:
[New] Tech Representative callsign:
[New] Tech Representative email:
[New] Tech Representative telephone:
Width of network requested (CIDR Notation):
Estimated number of subnets this will be divided into:
Estimated number of hosts on all subnets combined:
Network Service Provider name:
NSP postal address:
NSP telephone:
NSP email contact:
NSP ASN:
Ciao from Italy!
IW0SAB Renzo
>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: Brian(a)UCSD.Edu
>Data: 20/11/2012 19.21
>A: <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>Ogg: [44net] DRAFT directly routed subnets supplemental information form
>
>(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>_______________________________________________
>Here's a draft copy of the form that we're going to be asking people
>applying for directly routed subnets (BGP folks) to complete so that
>we can get the show on the road. I hope to start allocating those in
>early December.
>
>Anyone have suggestions or objections?
> - Brian
>
>===========================================================================
>Amateur Radio Digital Communications Inc
>
>Application for Directly Routed (CIDR delegated) Subnet
>
>Please provide the requested information regarding the organization/person
>to whom the addresses will be licensed.
>
>By submitting this form you affirm that you have read and agree to the
>Acceptable Use and Terms of Service attached herein.
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Organization name:
>
>Organization postal address:
>
>Organization email:
>
>Representative name:
>
>Representative callsign:
>
>Representative email:
>
>Representative telephone:
>
>Width of network requested (CIDR Notation):
>
>Estimated number of subnets this will be divided into:
>
>Estimated number of hosts on all subnets combined:
>
>Network Service Provider name:
>
>NSP postal address:
>
>NSP telephone:
>
>NSP email contact:
>
>NSP ASN:
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>(TOS would be attached here.)
>_________________________________________
>44Net mailing list
>44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>
In response to advice from some of you, we've added two new
clauses to the terms of service. These are
> ARDC's license of address(es) to You grants You a limited, non-exclusive,
> non-transferrable, non-assignable, and terminable right to use the
> address(es) in accordance with this Agreement and Terms solely for the
> purposes stated herein. The duration of this license is five (5) years,
> renewable upon Your request and consent to these Terms and Agreement
> and subject to the discretion of ARDC.
and
> You may cancel this license at any time and for any reason by contacting
> ARDC in writing and receiving acknowledgement of such request. Usage of
> the address(es) must cease effective with the license cancellation.
The full Terms of Service Agreement may be found on the AMPR web site
http://www.ampr.org/
And may I gently remind folks that there is a DONATE button on that web site;
we're still over $1,000 in debt at this point, all of it out of my pocket.
Any amounts would be greatly appreciated.
- Brian
Here's a draft copy of the form that we're going to be asking people
applying for directly routed subnets (BGP folks) to complete so that
we can get the show on the road. I hope to start allocating those in
early December.
Anyone have suggestions or objections?
- Brian
===========================================================================
Amateur Radio Digital Communications Inc
Application for Directly Routed (CIDR delegated) Subnet
Please provide the requested information regarding the organization/person
to whom the addresses will be licensed.
By submitting this form you affirm that you have read and agree to the
Acceptable Use and Terms of Service attached herein.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organization name:
Organization postal address:
Organization email:
Representative name:
Representative callsign:
Representative email:
Representative telephone:
Width of network requested (CIDR Notation):
Estimated number of subnets this will be divided into:
Estimated number of hosts on all subnets combined:
Network Service Provider name:
NSP postal address:
NSP telephone:
NSP email contact:
NSP ASN:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(TOS would be attached here.)
I am interested.. If no one else is...
----- Original Message -----
From: 44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu <44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Tue Nov 13 16:26:45 2012
Subject: [44net] Gateway entry / pub routing
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
There is a tunnel on the encap list that needs correction (recursive
routing):
route addprivate 44.131.192/29 encap 44.131.192.1
I have also noticed that routing from the public internet doesn't go any
further than the 132.239.255.131 host at UCSD, but I've only spot test a
few hosts other than myself.
If anyone is interested in using a Cisco router for GW connectivity, I
have a 7206 (non VXR) chassis(empty) up for grabs/trade.
73
Jason
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
> Actually, ampr encap uses proto 4 (IPIP), proto 94 being obsolete.
> 73s de Marius, YO2LOJ
Thanks for clarifying that for me Marius! KA9Q still gets a mention in
IOS 12.4 though.
73
Nick.
Jason,
This is my IOS config for a 1721 but should work on other routers with
an AUX port.
The aux port corresponds to line 5 (show line will identify it).
Encapsulation is set to slip but you can also set it to ppp. Connection
to a PC serial port is via a normal Cisco (blue) rollover cable.
!
interface Async5
ip address 192.168.44.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation slip
async mode dedicated
!
!
line aux 0
modem InOut
transport input all
flowcontrol hardware
rxspeed 19200
txspeed 19200
!
!
I would be most interested to see your perl script
Regards,
Nick.
Hello,
New to the list although I do have some JNOS experiences from 12+ years
ago. FIrstly, I seem to have volunteered myself as co-ordinator for
amprnets in my part of the UK - 44.131.[56-62] so I'd like to thank my
predecessor John G1HTL for his efforts over the past couple of decades.
I'm trying to discover what the best practice is for routing 44net
traffic based upon what I can see in the encap file. Presumably each one
of these is a tunnel, what would be defined in Cisco-speak as "tunnel
mode nos" (protocol 94)?
I'm experimenting here with the G8PZT Xrouter software which runs under
dos and provides ip connectivity to radio links. I have a spare Cisco
1721 that I've connected to Xrouter with a SLIP link to the aux port on
the router and once I figure out how to get encap routing up and running
I may be able to provide 44net access via a radio port (subject to UK
licensing of course ) .
I'm interested to know what other folks are using to route 44net over
the internet?
Regards,
Nick.
Guys
Wish to notify our site is down -
Due to an adsl fault - the cable was cut and awaiting it to be rejoined.
The temp fix they did a few months back has failed
Regards
Sam
Amateur Radio Callsign: VK4FQ / VK4TTT
Owner: VK4RCN P25 Repeater Cairns
Sysop: APRS Cairns
Mobile: VK4FQ-9 (vhf) VK4FQ-15 (Hf)
Hello.
Looking for links and forwarding partners via NET44
44.48.0.46 encap 69.27. 54.92
Node call n9lya-6
BBS call n9lya-5
If interested please add me and send me your info..
I can do AXUDP or IPIP
I am running Jnos 2.0j under debian 6.05
73 N9LYA
Jerry Kutche
Electrical Supervisor
Lehigh Cement Company LLC
180 N. Meridian Road
Mitchell, IN 47446
Phone: (812) 849-2191 ext. 251
Fax: (812) 849-5007
Cell: (812) 583-0445
jkutche(a)lehighcement.com<mailto:jkutche@lehighcement.com>
www.lehighcement.com<file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\kmundy\Application%20Data\Microsoft\S…>
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
A heads up or FYI:
For anyone exchanging messages with the W6RAY BBS (SJVBBS), I have
changed the IP address. As soon as you update your encap.txt or RIP, you
should have a correct address for w6ray.ampr.org. I have moved other
software to another computer due to both needing the same IP addresses.
The other software has its IP address in far more nodelists than the
encapsulated list. It is much simpler to change this one than the many
others.
On another note: I would like to publicly thank Bob Tenty for his
assistance in getting the W6RAY gateway accessible from the web. Bill
Lewis, KG6BAJ, has also helped me a great deal, including pointing me to
Bob. Thanks to both of you.
73 de Ray Quinn W6RAY
Visalia, CA USA DM06ih
Although the AMPR web portal is still under development, it would be
very helpful if all the AMPR IP Address Coordinators were to please
connect to <https://portal.ampr.org/> and register their login and password.
In this way we can get the coordinator contact information updated.
Thank you.
- Brian
I just unplugged my jnos see if it stopped..
----- Original Message -----
From: 44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu <44net-bounces+jkutche=lehighcement.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Sun Oct 14 07:08:45 2012
Subject: [44net] Fwd: nuisance proto 94 ipip OSPFv2
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Anyone else getting this from 99.119.146.20? It's not a huge amount of
bandwidth here, but it's a multicast of some type, and it comes from
that ip with a 44-net address encapped in it...resolved to a k9
something....been constantly hitting me at about 40-50 packets per
minute....
I've set my router to silently drop them for now....
Cheers,
John
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Hi Chris,
my name is Marco and I'm Ampr Coordinator for Italy: 44.134.0.0/16.
Please, can you allocate this range to me ?
And...
please can you also add these Gateways to my account ?
Account name: iw2ohx
Gateways:
Title 83.211.73.103
Gateway IP 83.211.73.103
Subnet 44.134.160.0 / 24
Subnet 44.134.166.0 / 24
Subnet 44.134.167.128 / 25
Subnet 44.134.168.0 / 24
-
Title 91.121.90.186
Gateway IP 91.121.90.186
Subnet 44.134.0.0 / 20
Subnet 44.134.128.0 / 20
Subnet 44.134.144.0 / 22
Subnet 44.134.173.0 / 24
Subnet 44.134.174.0 / 23
Many thanks,
Marco
iw2ohx
On 10/09/2012 10:45 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> Another point I should mention concerning the new portal and Gateways robot:
>
> All of the current Gateway data has been imported into the new system. This means that if you already have a gateway registered on the current system, it will be present on the new system, so there is no need to add it.
>
> The downside to this, is that if you register on the portal to manage your gateway, it will not simply "appear" on your account. This is because it is already present on a default account.
>
> The solution is to contact me with your gateway details (Username as registered on the portal, Gateway IP and Subnets serviced) and I will transfer it across to your account.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
> G1FEF
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>
--
---
Marco Di Martino
Via Attimo, 18 - Bollate (MI)
Mobile: +393285373364
e-mail:iw2ohx@iw2ohx.net
-
Amateur Radio: I W 2 O H X
Homepage Inet:www.iw2ohx.net
Homepage Ampr: iw2ohx.ampr.orgLinuxNode:telnet://iw2ohx.ampr.org/
(X)net:telnet://iw2ohx-2.ampr.org/
Packet Mail : IW2OHX @ IW2OHX.ILOM.ITA.EU
Ampr Mail:iw2ohx@iw2ohx.ampr.org
---
Please note that the DNS functionality on the new portal is not live yet, any DNS update requests will be silently discarded by the system.
It is planned that this functionality will be available quite soon, at which time an announcement will be made on this mailing list.
Thanks,
Chris
G1FEF
There have been a few enquiries regarding how to retrieve the encap.txt and gateways file from the new system:
You can use FTP by connecting to the host: portal.ampr.org
The username and password is the same as the old system (please drop me an email if you don't know it).
Once you have created an account on the portal, if you click on the top menu link "Gateways" then click on "Options" on the second menu line a page is displayed where you can enter an email address and select the frequency you wish to receive the encap.txt file. From that point on it will be emailed to the address you have entered. If the email address field is blank, you will NOT be emailed the encap.txt file.
If you click on "List" from the "Gateways" menu, you can also download the latest encap.txt file from the link at the top of this page.
The download link on the "List" page is "live" data, i.e. if someone updates their gateways entry, it will appear in the database immediately and so the moment you browse to that page, or refresh that page, you have the very latest data. The file on the FTP site is updated only when a change occurs, there is a cronjob that polls the database every 5 minutes and updates the file if anything changed, so the FTP file will at worst be 5 minutes out of date.
With regards to the "gateways" file that was available on the old system: we did not believe that this file was very useful as all the data it contained is now on the portal. However, there have been a few people ask about it. If this file is being used, then let me know and I can put work in to create the file on the FTP site. If it's not important then don't bother contacting me and I won;t spend the time on it ;-)
73,
Chris
G1FEF
Many thanks to everyone involved in the amprnet facelift/update.
I don't know if all of this will stay the same, but I just recently
documented the experimental gateway that I built.
http://www.qsl.net/kb9mwr/wapr/tcpip/rip44d.html
In poking around on www.ampr.org, I have to say I am in awe of what
the European hams are doing to build RF networks.
I know there are also some pretty talented microwave design amateurs
over there from reading Dubus and some of the RSGB books.
I am wondering if anyone has designed homebrew amplifiers for any of
the WLAN gear? Feel free to contact me off list.
73'
Steve, KB9MWR
It does not it act: ftp://ftp.ampr-gateways.org/
Did I overlook something ???
--
73 de Janusz / SP1LOP
===== Janusz J. Przybylski, SP1LOP ==================
Poland AmprNet Co-ordinator [44.165/16] from: 03.2003
=====================================================
i get the updates vy email and this is the last one i got on 10/02/2012
encap.txt,v 1.816 2012/10/02 05:02:01 gateways Exp $
#
On 10/06/12, Janusz Przybylski SP1LOP <44net(a)mail.sp1lop.ampr.org> wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> It does not it act: ftp://ftp.ampr-gateways.org/
> Did I overlook something ???
>
> --
>
> 73 de Janusz / SP1LOP
> ===== Janusz J. Przybylski, SP1LOP ==================
> Poland AmprNet Co-ordinator [44.165/16] from: 03.2003
> =====================================================
>
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>
>
Hi,
Thanks for writing this program and your support.
Turns out I had the wrong netmask on my tunnel interface.
Seems to be working now.
73'
Steve, KB9MWR
Not all that long ago I installed the new rip44d on a CentOS install.
It did receive the broadcasts as I saw them in debug mode. However it
didn't seem to install these routes to the local routing table.
I assume that has to with networking working slightly different on the
various flavor of Linux.
So now I am trying with Ubuntu 10.04 server, but I can't even seem to
receive the broadcasts. It just sits there in the main loop waiting
for broadcasts. Yet when I watch with tcpdump, there are things going
on. But I am mostly concerned by the udp port unreachable that I am
responding with:
(For now) I have the Linux firewall completely disabled (as far as I
know... more of a RedHat guy) and connected directly to the outside
world.
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
13:30:00.337401 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu.route >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com.38700: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
13:30:00.337442 IP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com >
amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu: ICMP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com udp
port 38700 unreachable, length 540
13:30:00.337454 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com: IP gw.ampr.org.route >
rip2-routers.mcast.net.route: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
(ipip-proto-4)
13:30:00.337606 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu.route >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com.38700: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
13:30:00.337624 IP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com >
amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu: ICMP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com udp
port 38700 unreachable, length 540
13:30:00.337632 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com: IP gw.ampr.org.route >
rip2-routers.mcast.net.route: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
(ipip-proto-4)
13:30:00.337976 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu.route >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com.38700: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
13:30:00.338000 IP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com >
amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu: ICMP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com udp
port 38700 unreachable, length 540
13:30:00.338008 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com: IP gw.ampr.org.route >
rip2-routers.mcast.net.route: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
(ipip-proto-4)
13:30:00.338015 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu.route >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com.38700: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
13:30:00.338026 IP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com >
amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu: ICMP cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com udp
port 38700 unreachable, length 540
13:30:00.339133 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu >
cpe-174-103-224-97.new.res.rr.com: IP gw.ampr.org.route >
rip2-routers.mcast.net.route: RIPv2, Response, length: 504
I am looking for tips on what I am doing wrong, or what distribution
and steps those who are doing this had success with.
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
I found this topic back in the archives, and can shed a little light on
it from my testing. If you are looking to fully convert the encap.txt
for use on a cisco device, you will need a 2600 or better to handle the
large number of tunnels needed. I used an old encap.txt file and
converted about 320 tunnels which brought a 2610 to a screeching halt. I
will be testing with a 2651XM to see how results differ, hopefully I
will not need to get out any of the big stuff. Below is the output of a
converted line from an old encap.txt:
!
interface tunnel 750190592 <--tunnel number created from converting ip
to decimal
description Link to 44.183.0.0
ip unnumbered loopback1 <-- using the loopback as the assigned 44
address space (could use a physical)
tunnel source 99.119.146.20
tunnel destination 130.208.168.63
tunnel mode nos <-- compatible with jnos
!
ip route 44.183.0.0 255.255.0.0 tunnel750190592
!
The next issue is RIP updated to jnos. I get updated sent to jnos, but
it does not add them to the routing table. The error states that the
routes are not from IPIP and they are domain 0. I will make the
conversion script available when I get it a little more polished.
Jason
http://www.ampr.org/tos.txt
Still a little technical work to be done but start your planning for new IP
focused amateur radio networks.
Need a HSMM network space?
Need a fixed IP for a repeater, remote control station, gateway, ROIP, etc.
Need a few routable IP addresses for multiple instances of an application
that uses a well known TCP or UDP port?
I have a few slides from my short presentation at DCC today that I will
make available in the next few days.
A small working group, to which I was honored to be included, worked out
guidelines for the creation of this AUP over the last few months and it was
published today.
------------------------------
John D. Hays
K7VE
PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
<http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
<http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
hi group
im looking to add a few more links/forwarding partners. need european.
latin america and aus and or nz
but will welcome anyone :)
i am also interested in hf forwarding if anyone is still doing it anymore
thanks
glenn - ka0mos/ve1
It looks like you missed one so I'll sum it up...
I can ping Jim but cannot telnet to him. A password issue of some sort.
Don - ve3zda
-----Original Message-----
From: Don [mailto:ve3zda@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 7:44 PM
To: '44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu'
Subject: [44net] forwarding partners
Hey Glenn,
I can ping him no problem.
Don - ve3zda
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+ve3zda=gmail.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+ve3zda=gmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Glenn
A. Bursell - KA0MOS/VE1
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:18 PM
To: AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] forwarding partners
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
hi jim
good to hear from you
i am not able to ping you
glenn
_______________________________________________ Glenn i am getting my
system back up Can you check connectivity to me? Jim af5ca ex wu3v
44.108.3.30 Jim Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:45 AM, "Glenn
A. Bursell - KA0MOS/VE1" <ka0mos(a)eastlink.ca> wrote:
>> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>> _______________________________________________
>> hi group
>>
>> im looking to add a few more links/forwarding partners. need european.
latin america and aus and or nz
>> but will welcome anyone :)
>> i am also interested in hf forwarding if anyone is still doing it anymore
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> glenn - ka0mos/ve1
>> _________________________________________
>> 44Net mailing list
>> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Hey Glenn,
I can ping him no problem.
Don - ve3zda
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+ve3zda=gmail.com(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+ve3zda=gmail.com@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of Glenn
A. Bursell - KA0MOS/VE1
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:18 PM
To: AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] forwarding partners
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
hi jim
good to hear from you
i am not able to ping you
glenn
_______________________________________________ Glenn i am getting my
system back up Can you check connectivity to me? Jim af5ca ex wu3v
44.108.3.30 Jim Sent from my iPhone On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:45 AM, "Glenn
A. Bursell - KA0MOS/VE1" <ka0mos(a)eastlink.ca> wrote:
>> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>> _______________________________________________
>> hi group
>>
>> im looking to add a few more links/forwarding partners. need european.
latin america and aus and or nz
>> but will welcome anyone :)
>> i am also interested in hf forwarding if anyone is still doing it anymore
>>
>>
>> thanks
>> glenn - ka0mos/ve1
>> _________________________________________
>> 44Net mailing list
>> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
KB9MWR,
I have had success using Ubuntu Linux 12.04 LTS and rip44d to make an AMPR router. It seems at the point you executed rip44d, your tunl0 interface was not yet properly configured and the interface placed into UP status.
There were only a few main things I had to do in setup:
1.) Enable IPv4 forwarding
2.) create a startup script that: starts the IPIP tunnel as tunl0 and specifies its IP address, specify routing to AMPRGW and setup a Kernel route 'table 44' that has all 44/8 traffic use this routing table (thanks to Brian and PE1CHL for this information)
3.) at the end of this script, have it execute rip44d which was modified on line 201 to places routes on 'table 44'
You should be able to use the commands in this script on the CLI to enable the tunnel and rip44d in verbose mode to see the paswword, then just place it and your AMPR IP assignments (your 44 IP address/CIDR, the password and your Gateway address) into the script in the proper places.
These instructions do not cover the setup of eth0 and eth1, which during my setup, eth0 was a dynamically assigned IP by my residential gateway router that forwards tunnel packets into the subnet, eth1 is now configured to provide an Ethernet interface for my 44.60.44.0/24 LAN.
########################################################
### Enables AMPR IPIP Tunnel Interface
modprobe ipip
ip addr add 44.60.44.2/24 dev tunl0
# gives tunnel its own TTL enabling traceroute over tunnel
ip tunnel change ttl 64 mode ipip tunl0
ip link set dev tunl0 up
### Creates AMPR Default Routes on main Route Table
#route to 44.60.44.0/24 on main route table
ip rule add to 44.60.44.0/24 table main priority 1
### Specifies Routes to and from 44/8 are entered on Route Table 44
ip rule add from 44.0.0.0/8 table 44 priority 44
ip rule add to 44.0.0.0/8 table 44 priority 45
### Creates Default Route to the AMPRGW and the
### Internet At-large, on the 44 Router
## Per PE1CHL: 'This is "required" to get routing of the net-44 traffic correct
## and have a default route for the tunneled traffic different from the default
## route of the system. It may be possible to get it working without this,
## but policy based routing is so much easier'
# AMPRGW connects via eth0
ip route add 169.228.66.251 dev eth0 table 44
# Connection to 0/0 by 44/8 Hosts on AMPRGW, commenting disables Internet access for your 44 subnet
ip route add default dev tunl0 via 169.228.66.251 onlink table 44
### Begins the rip44d Router Dameon ###
./rip44d_table44 -a <YOUR PUBLIC IP> -p <THE PASSWORD> < /dev/null &
########################################################
########################################################
### EDIT rip44d Line 201
### - $cmd = "LANG=C $routebin route add $rkey via $nexthop dev $tunnel_if window $tcp_window onlink";
### + $cmd = "LANG=C $routebin route add $rkey via $nexthop dev $tunnel_if window $tcp_window onlink table 44";
########################################################
73,
Lynwood Leach
KB3VWG
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-request <44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
To: 44net <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Sent: Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:58 pm
Subject: 44Net Digest, Vol 1, Issue 69
Send 44Net mailing list submissions to
44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
44net-owner(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of 44Net digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. rip44d and centos (kb9mwr(a)gmail.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 19:55:28 -0500
From: kb9mwr(a)gmail.com
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: [44net] rip44d and centos
Message-ID:
<CAK4XxyQiY5m+_f3fi2HD2Nd6Pie1qTwbMM_crsyfz14wS_Hz6g(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello,
I decided I am going to try and setup a gateway for the first time. I
like the rip44d idea, but I didn't get very far. Can anyone provide
some pointers?
I am trying to do it on CentOS 5 install directly connected to the
outside world.
http://wiki.ampr-gateways.org/index.php?title=Rip44d
[root@ham ~]# rpm -i perl-IO-Interface-1.04-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
[root@cpe-174-103-214-209 ~]# rpm -i
perl-IO-Socket-Multicast-1.12-1.rhel5.i386.rpm
[root@ham ~]# ./rip44d -v
Prototype mismatch: sub main::AF_INET: none vs () at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/constant.pm line 99.
found local address: 174.103.214.209
found local address: 127.0.0.1
opening UDP socket 520...
unknown or unconfigured interace tunl0 at ./rip44d line 469
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
End of 44Net Digest, Vol 1, Issue 69
************************************
Hello,
I decided I am going to try and setup a gateway for the first time. I
like the rip44d idea, but I didn't get very far. Can anyone provide
some pointers?
I am trying to do it on CentOS 5 install directly connected to the
outside world.
http://wiki.ampr-gateways.org/index.php?title=Rip44d
[root@ham ~]# rpm -i perl-IO-Interface-1.04-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm
[root@cpe-174-103-214-209 ~]# rpm -i
perl-IO-Socket-Multicast-1.12-1.rhel5.i386.rpm
[root@ham ~]# ./rip44d -v
Prototype mismatch: sub main::AF_INET: none vs () at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/constant.pm line 99.
found local address: 174.103.214.209
found local address: 127.0.0.1
opening UDP socket 520...
unknown or unconfigured interace tunl0 at ./rip44d line 469
Thanks,
Steve, KB9MWR